@"Aiesha G."
I used Cambridge packets for several months, which helped me see the pattern of mistakes I was making. Currently I just take PTs and timed sections from PT1-35 and A, B and C.
I recommend what i did after fool proofing PT1-35 which was taking them in section format under time and watched J.Y videos again this time primarily for learning time saving strategies he mentions. I improved from -16 to -0.
@Kateryna said:
Do you think if i print the games from pt1-35 and just drill them until I get them right under time conditions it will improve my score?
I think this would drastically improve your score, yes.
... i print the games from pt1-35 and just drill them until ... . I drilled all the games PT1-35 using the fool proof method ... />
@Kateryna said:
Will 35 tests be enough?
... by foolproofing every game from PT1-35. Once you've foolproofed a ... encounter new games as you PT, run them through the same ... doing. Until you've foolproofed 1-35, I think it's too ...
@abmustephan games in PT1-35 are not harder but a ... LSAC got predictable during PT 40s and PT 50s but believe it ... a game in one of PT 70s that is the carbon ... . If you can get PT1-35 LG sections and games down ...
Speed will come as you improve in understanding Logic games and see repeated inferences. I blind review after I have taken a PT. But I do it by each game, individually. That way the inferences are fresh.
@Sami said:
Speed will come as you improve in understanding Logic games and see repeated inferences. I blind review after I have taken a PT. But I do it by each game, individually. That way the inferences are fresh.