HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| lr | 21.4K | 37.5K |
| rc | 18K | 31.1K |
| lg | 16.7K | 27.6K |
-
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... easy (I had LR LG LR LR RC). I think the LR section talking about Shakespeare ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... taker, my test order is LG RC LR RC LR, have 2 RCs. Remember that ... the first RC have the last passage of ... international law. For the 2nd RC, have the AB passage of ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... taker, my test order is LG RC LR RC LR, have 2 RCs. Remember that ... the first RC have the last passage of ... international law. For the 2nd RC, have the AB passage of ... you.
The 2nd RC is the real one according ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; @jcylin93 said:
> Had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC. Any idea what the question ... distribution for LR was? Remember it being 25 ... the same question distribution for LR. Thought I might have made ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... easy (I had LR LG LR LR RC). I think the LR section talking about Shakespeare ... well. Do you remember which LR section it was in? I ... collection/correction real? And which LR section was it in for ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... said:
> > Had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC. Any idea what the question ... the same question distribution for LR. Thought I might have ... /> >
Mine was a RC, LR, LG, RC, LR.
I'm pretty sure ... real sections are LR 25, LR, 26, LG 23, and RC 27 for a ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... easy (I had LR LG LR LR RC). I think the LR section talking about Shakespeare ... did not have an experimental LR.
RC, LR, LG, RC, LR -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... easy (I had LR LG LR LR RC). I think the LR section talking about Shakespeare ... well. Do you remember which LR section it was in? I ... collection/correction real? And which LR section was it in for ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the experimental section. The other LG I struggled with hard. Enough ... extra time after finishing an LG section but for the experimental ... /> My LSAT section order was LG- LR- LG- RC- LG
This is my logic ... people with only one LG think the LG is easy. It is ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the experimental section. The other LG I struggled with hard. Enough ... extra time after finishing an LG section but for the experimental ... ; My LSAT section order was LG- LR- LG- RC- LG
> This is my ... people with only one LG think the LG is easy. It is ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... />
LG (exp) - LR - LG - RC - LR
RC (exp) - LR - LG - RC - LR
LR - LG - LR - LG - RC (unsure of exp ... )
LG: XX ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
haha when you had 3 LR and you remember all of the above mentioned LR ?s... ugh..
I had LR(25) LG LR(26) (Break) LR(26) RC. -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; My LSAT section order was LG- LR- LG- RC- LG
> This is my ... people with only one LG think the LG is easy. It is ... ; My LSAT section order was LG- LR- LG- RC- LG
> This is my ... />
I had two LR and one LG question. The real section ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the experimental section. The other LG I struggled with hard. Enough ... extra time after finishing an LG section but for the experimental ... ; My LSAT section order was LG- LR- LG- RC- LG
> This is my ... people with only one LG think the LG is easy. It is ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... water?
I had LR--LG--LR--LR--RC. The first question came from ... my first LR, the second one from my ... second LR.
I'm obsessing ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
>
> ... /> > Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in ... the 2nd LR (3rd section overall). I think ... this question, my experimental was RC. -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> & ... ; Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in ... the 2nd LR (3rd section overall). ... this question, my experimental was RC.
+1
< ... RC and I did not remember a Madagascar LR ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> >
> I had LR--LG--LR--LR--RC. The first question came from ... my first LR, the second one from my ... second LR.
>
> I ... somewhat confident that my second LR section was experimental too -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... people who had:
LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC
... LR was the experimental.
I had:
LR(25)-LG-LR(26)-LR ... (26)-RC
Is ... whether the second or third LR (each with 26 questions) ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Bombed RC. Had it 4th and literally ... blacked out on the first LR but bounced back with I ... believe near perfect 26 question LR and LG.
Beads and ... -
Overheard at September lsat, and other score/ cancellation related issuesOverheard: How many questions guessed: #real lsats taken prior: Expected score: Cancel - y/n: Timing issues y/n Sorry for the randomness;)
... gets 27/27 on each LR section *upside down face emoji ... guessed on RC, no Q's guessed on other LR and LG.
LG for sure -0 or -1, LR: -1 to -3 on each, RC ... : nope
Timing issues: RC -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Has anyone come to any conclusions on if the 1st or 3rd section was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format? Would appreciate any input even if you are not certain -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format? Would ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format? Would ... have been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd over ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format? Would ... have been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd over ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format? Would ... have been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd over ... to conclude that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This stinks because I ... 1 question in the first LR because it was hard as ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format? Would ... have been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd over ... to conclude that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This sticks because I ... 1 question in the first LR because it was hard as ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format? ... been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd ... conclude that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This sticks because ... question in the first LR because it was hard ... Same...between that LR section and the RC I'm sure ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format? Would ... to conclude that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This sticks because I ... ; Same...between that LR section and the RC I'm sure my ... possibly give us another easy LG/hard RC test again in December ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format? Would ... to conclude that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This sticks because I ... give us another easy LG/hard RC test again in December ... talking about. Unfortunately for me LR and RC are wildcards. I don ...
