HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| lr | 21.4K | 37.5K |
| untimed | 2.2K | 3.1K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
-
Improving Logical ReasoningSo I am retaking my LSAT in December and I just need to improve my LR. I am going through powerscore books and re-learning each question type because…
... lot of 7sagers recommend against LR by section because you'll never ... is the best thing for LR. I would recommend looking at ... out or buy lots of LR sections. (Personally, I started with ... just kept taking about a section every other day, plus regular ... -
PT79.S4.Q14 - psychology researchers observed thatHaving trouble ruling out C.
Edited your title since you had the wrong section (Psych researchers LR is Section 4!) -
September 2016 retakersIf you took the September LSAT how do you feel you did on December? Better or worse?
LR - One section harder, one section easier
LG - Easier
RC - Easier
I canceled in Sept due to illness but we'll see in a few weeks. -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I started with 1 section of LR, then1 section of RC, followed by 2 ... LR and 1 LG. I ... felt awesome about the first LR section. I even finished with extra ... I totally bombed the LG section. When practicing that's usually ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember all those questions. I am relieved. My experimental was definitely section one -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... :
> I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
I got ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... so you know if the LR sections are randomized too, that ... had 134 too for LR but section 1 seemed so much more ... I was absolutely NOT expecting LR back to back. -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
> @xrssa89 said:
> I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember all those questions. I am relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
how do you know it's experimental one? -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... :
> I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I ... was definitely section one
I also had LR for 1 ... who doesn't have experimental LR also said had it. -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > > I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I ... definitely section one
>
> I also had LR for ... who doesn't have experimental LR also said had it.
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... :
> I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
This was ...Struggling with timingHey guys, So I just wanted to get some feedback on how I should approach my issue. I took my first timed LR section and scored only 10/25 (I only…
... read effectively and quickly on LR; that section has always given me ... plenty of questions on each LR section that are quick and easy ... the second half of the section. Give yourself the chance to ...For those of us studying "Full-Time" ....What hours do you full-timers usually study?
... )
1015-12:00: Drilling LR types based on my weaknesses ... /> 2:00-4:00 Individual LR/RC section with BR; alternate between ... the two each day. IE. Monday: LR ...For those of us studying "Full-Time" ....What hours do you full-timers usually study?
... /> > 1015-12:00: Drilling LR types based on my weaknesses ... ; 2:00-4:00 Individual LR/RC section with BR; alternate between ... the two each day. IE. Monday: LR ...Huge PT/Timing Anxiety Affecting Performance...Good morning everyone, So I've been "studying" for a long time now, nearing 1.5 years. Pushed back for various reasons, but I'm really convinced t…
... /game/passage type drills, and untimed section drills. to work on bridging ...-5 to -0 almost overnightHey all, I had scored a -5 on every single LR section for about 15 sections while I reviewed each section the following day. Then, about a week…
... I enjoy, and did an untimed section the morning of the test ...Difficulty with timingHi all, I just finished my second PT and the timing just killed me. I think my attempt at further analysis of the questions is limiting my time ev…
... pacing. For now, focus on untimed section drills to continue developing your ...How people approach studying for the LSATHello! I have been studying for the LSAT using 7sage for 1 month now, and I'm struggling to study efficiently. It's been personally difficult for me …
... long lunch to do an LR/RC section with review. I then ... at home doing drills on LR questions that I find difficult ...With a month left....not sure what to doWell folks it's just over a month until the September 2017 test. Of course that feels like the test is tomorrow. I'm not really sure what to do. …
... miss on average 4 on LR (each section), 4 on RC (from ... 2 to 5 on each section; but I am happy with ... LR packet, doing six games (not section!) per day and 1 RC section ... think we can improve our LR!Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Hey, so I had LR LG LR LR RC
On my 2nd LR (3rd section) I had something about clerics exaggerating how religious peasants are, and I was wondering if you can help me figure out if this was the experimental section? Thanks in advance.Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... LR LG LR LR RC
>
> On my 2nd LR (3rd section ... if this was the experimental section? Thanks in advance.
section was real.Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
Do you ... LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in the 2nd LR (3rd section ... overall). I think i bombed that 3rd section but ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
>
> ... LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in the 2nd LR (3rd section ... overall). I think i bombed that 3rd section but ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
>
> ... LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in the 2nd LR (3rd section ... overall). I think i bombed that 3rd section but ... haha. Thanks!!!
2 LR's and did not have ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> ... LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in the 2nd LR (3rd section ... overall). I think i bombed that 3rd section ... than 1 experimental section to LG then? ... Ugh it sucks having LR as an experimental cuz ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> >
LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in the 2nd LR (3rd section ... overall). I think i bombed that 3rd section but ... !!!
>
> 2 LR's and did not have ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in the 2nd LR (3rd section ... overall). I think i bombed that 3rd section but ... ; Really hoping the first section of LR was the experimental because I ... 2 LR's and this was 100% included in a real section.Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> > > ... LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in the 2nd LR (3rd section ... overall). I think i bombed that 3rd section but ... ; >
> > 2 LR's and did not have ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
>
> ... LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in the 2nd LR (3rd section ... overall). I think i bombed that 3rd section but ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> >
LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in the 2nd LR (3rd section ... overall). I think i bombed that 3rd section but ... did not remember a Madagascar LR question at all.
