HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| lsat | 47K | 78.8K |
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 64 | 227 | 256 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.8K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 23 | 1.2K | 1.4K |
-
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
Addressing PrepTest 9, Section 2, Question #23:
I'm going ... -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
If any one is curious the question that I'm looking at with regards to the above is PT 49, Section 2 Question 17 -
Need help from a Sage? (Closed)Hi all, I got a ton of help from fellow 7Sagers when I was studying for the LSAT. Now that I'm a Sage, I'm trying to pay it forward by helping out…
Thanks!
LSAT PrepTest 27, Section 4, Question 16 | D
LSAT PrepTest 27, Section 4, Question 02 | B -
Need help from a Sage? (Closed)Hi all, I got a ton of help from fellow 7Sagers when I was studying for the LSAT. Now that I'm a Sage, I'm trying to pay it forward by helping out…
... /> @emli1000:
LSAT PrepTest 27, Section 4, Question 16 | D
The ... - overeating.
LSAT PrepTest 27, Section 4, Question 02 | B
The ... -
Necessary and sufficientI understand that this is probably a dumb question but I keep having difficulties with flaw questions that have answers that "confuse necessary and s…
... I was working on PT 73 section 4, question 25:
I ... -
Conditional Answer Choices for STRENGTHEN/WEAKENHi thanks in advance if anyone can help. How should I deal with conditional answer choices in strengthen and weaken questions. Does it matter if the …
... . The first one is from PT 4 section 1 #13. I was able ... ? The next one is from PT 5 Section 3 #8 where i ... -
Search function?Is there a specific search box for the discussion board (not control + F)? Am I just blind?
... annoyed if you ask a question that has already been asked ... I posted!
PT 66 Section 4 Question 20.
Conditionals ... -
diagramming this out...I'm really stuck. I understand that the correct answer is A, but I can't diagram the logic out. I'm fairly certain it involves subsets, which has alw…
@jspence316 can you post the PT number, section and question number, or the link to the curriculum problem you are talking about? -
PT 79 section 1I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried.
@esteerose said:
I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried.
Have you taken many other PTs from the 70s series? -
Panda's guide to answer all SA, PSA, Strengthen and WeakenHi Guys, I think I have spent a lot of effort in coming this up and I want to share with you my hypothesis to see what you guys think about this …
... questions. For example: PT 68, Sec 2 Question 23 was, at the time ... -
Causation Question StrategyWould somebody mind looking at the strategy below and letting me know if it makes sense/I've included everything? Thanks! On weakening questi…
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation. -
The indicator "even if"Hi, I know that there are many words that indicate what groups (universal quantifiers) you are in. Among them, where does the word "even if" belong t…
... function.
For PT 46 Section 3 Question 24, are you referring ... -
Beliefs v. FactsI've only come across this type of flaw a few times, but I'd like to understand the structure behind it. The explanation and example offered in the c…
Just came across an excellent example of this flaw on a really, really valuable question: PT 31 Section 2 question 21. -
"All that is required" Sufficiency or Necessity indicator?I understand that "ALL" is a sufficiency indicator word, and "REQUIRE" is a necessity indicator word. I'm wondering then, what does the phrase "*…
... : EJ-->ROW)
[ PT 15, Section 3, Question 7].
Knowing ... -
Sufficiency/Necessity Flaw QuestionsHey guys can you direct me to some flaw questions where the answer is the Sufficiency/Necessity answer? Especially the tough ones.
Yea I just saw one yesterday that was very difficult(at least for me.)
PT 63 Section 1 #25. -
New NA and SA difficultiesThe new NA and SA questions in PT 70 onward are killing me. I thought I had a strong grasp of them since I did well on almost all of them from PTs 52…
... yes! The questions were: PT 70, section 1, Q21. Section 4, Q. 20.
New NA and SA difficultiesThe new NA and SA questions in PT 70 onward are killing me. I thought I had a strong grasp of them since I did well on almost all of them from PTs 52…
... yes! The questions were: PT 70, section 1, Q21. Section 4, Q. 20.
PT14.S4.Q9 - anyone who supports the new tax planI'm really having trouble with this question. Am I supposed to approach it as a sufficient assumption question though it's a flaw question? Thanks in…
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section 4 question 20.Mostly Strongly SupportedI am still in the process of going through these lessons so I might be ahead of myself but is there a formula for tackling most strongly support ques…
... them. You can revisit the question(s) after you learn more ... point us to a specific question or two that you particularly ... or telling us the PT number,section, and question number. Perhaps we will ...Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
...
6) Circular Reasoning (PT17, Section 2, Q2; PT17, S2, Q20 ... />
16) Relative v. absolute (PT 53, Section 1, Q22)
17 ... />
18) Red herring (PT 18, S4, Q11; PT18, S2 ... Confusing part v. whole (PT 47, Section 3, Q25) I also ...Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... > 6) Circular Reasoning (PT17, Section 2, Q2; PT17, S2, Q20 ... /> > 16) Relative v. absolute (PT 53, Section 1, Q22)
>
> 18) Red herring (PT 18, S4, Q11; PT18, S2 ... Confusing part v. whole (PT 47, Section 3, Q25) I also describe ...How would you translate this?: Not all white women are Beckys, but all Beckys are white women.I'm hesitant to post this, but it's driving me crazy, so here goes: During a study break, I went down a rabbit hole and came across this article: …
... be recent, but PrepTest 55 Section 1 Question 25 is a pure example ...June 2019 BR Study Group- UPDATED!Hi Everyone: Here are the details for this study group! We will be doing a BR Session every Sunday, starting this upcoming Sunday, February 24 fr…
... leading the BR today of PT 65 Section 1 (Logical Reasoning) starting at ... in:
United States: +1 (224) 501-3412
Access ...Digital LSAT Tester Live (Public Beta)The digital tester is in public beta! Everyone can use the digital tester for any PTs they have access to on their account. When you're ready to t…
@"Alan Cheuk" It was only BR, no other weirdness. Pretty sure it was only 22 (PT 40 section 1)Digital LSAT Tester Live (Public Beta)The digital tester is in public beta! Everyone can use the digital tester for any PTs they have access to on their account. When you're ready to t…
... please let us know what PT and section are giving you trouble ... />
Yeah! It's PT 42 section 1 (logic games). It just stays ...
