I watched a explanation video but I still ... #9, I was choosing between A and B
For #10, I ... incorrect because it leads to a violation of the RF block ... .
... but I didn't see a very concise answer AB
and A --m-> /B
This ... be all...not, A --> /B (not 100%)
< ... not the case that (A --m-> /B)
- can ... be written out as A --m-> B ?
... A & B "cannot" be together, then:
- is A not B and B not A ... (or rather, is a biconditional ... br />
In a Grouping game, if A & B "cannot" be ... a negate necessary the only result? - is A ---> not B and B --> A ...
... /correlation. I've missed a lot of these due to ... not realizing that a question is actually testing causation ... prephrases (X causes A and B, A causes B rather than B causes A, etc) when ... rushed too quickly and chose a wrong AC without clearly eliminating ...
... Lawgic language (ex: A some B -> C, therefore A some C). However ... , Sufficient/Necessary Assumption there is a large need for Lawgic language ... of questions, or is there a strategy for this? Can Lawgic ...
can someone please explain to me the purpose of this column when reviewing answers. I see that it has a drop down arrow and when clicked little boxes appear but what is the point/ what are we suppose to do with them
... there another reason to eliminate A? B ) Children -> can ... This says school calisthenics are a necessary factor in EU children ... I writing the conditionals in A and B wrong? I originally picked ... A because I thought it ...
... so i see JY implement a strategy for comparative RC. ... seems when JY sees a comparative passage, he first ... that ONE SPECIFIC passage (A or B). If he sees ... solely ask about B, he'll read passage B first. ... After this, he reads passage A, and then goes back ...
... why he eliminated answer choice A is incorrect. In absolute terms ... like how when given A-most->B-most->C, we ... can't make any inferences between A ... the correct reasoning for eliminating A.
... am having some trouble comparing A and B to each other. I ... is confusing the consequences of a hypothetical with just one person ... anybody shed some light on A and B?
... really torn between A and B and eventually chose A. But when ... I found out it was B ... the absence of a supposed effect strengthens a causation argument. Originally ... about reverse causation and a third independent cause, but ...
a) Based on your LSAT/academic ... you'll LIKELY receive a scholarship... b) Based on your LSAT ... you'll be eligible for a guaranteed scholarship...
c) ... academic profile can POTENTIALLY receive a scholarship up to ... ...
In regards to PT31 Game 2 question 8, if the rule states /A and/B —-> C, then the contrapositive would be /C —-> A or B. My question is, can both A and B be in (I.e. at least one is in) or is it just either A or B, not both. Thank you!
... me out with answer choice A and B, but I think I ... figured it out.
(A) You ... support this answer choice.
(B) "Until now studies ... have always ... definitely supports our answer choice (B), which says that results encouraged ...
... the inference. So if a rule for a grouping game says something ... that piece A must stay away from piece B and a question might ... tell us that piece B is ... know that answer choices (A) and (B) violate rule 5 and answer ...