HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| not | 65.1K | 113.8K |
| a | 136.2K | 436K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
-
Not (A-->B) QuestionHi all, quick question! In the Harder MBT Questions unit, JY covers two questions that involve the negation of embedded conditionals. I'm a little …
... />
A --> B
NOT (A -->B) which becomes:
A **some** /B
(A -->B) --> /C
C --> NOT (A-->B) which becomes ... :
C --> A **and** /B
Does "A causes B" equal to A -->B?Hi, guys, I am confused with the relationship between "causation" and conditional logic. Could anyone give me some help? According to the lessons, it…
... "A causes B" = A-->B. However, in PT25-S4-Q12, this rule does not ... at the school. This is a parallel flaw question. I am ...A/B (10 point) Grading ScaleThe undergrad institution I am about to graduate from has the 10 point, or A/B, scale. We do not have A+/- scale. I currently have a 3.93 GPA. Will t…
... 10 point, or A/B, scale. We do not have A+/- scale. I currently ... have a 3.93 GPA ... LSAC requirements, as I have not failed or retaken any classes ...[ENDED] Free RC Tutoring, A-B Passage; PT 65 Passage 3Hi Everyone, Last session was great. Thanks to everyone who showed up. We made RC fun!. : ) So last time we focused on low resolution-high re…
... to do one A-B passage. There is a different way to ... these kinds of passages a piece of cake and ... method.
Since A-B passages don't start till ... a good call.
If any one of you does not ... .
If you do not have time to take it ...Access to PT A, B, C and Feb '97Hi y'all, I remain invisible(I'm just silently drilling LG's in my room) but I'm always so pleased to be a part of such a supportive community cal…
... so pleased to be a part of such a supportive community called ... here: I cannot find PT A, B, C and Feb '97 as ... from the past. Is there a specific reason as to why ... these PT's are not offered?
Thanks for ...A will ensure B -- does this mean A -> B or B -> A?Finally done with the LR section of CC and going through my notes. I dont remember which exact LR question this is from but I remember one of the…
... the lines of "doing A will ensure that B happens."
I ... have in my notes A -> B, but I want to ... the occurence of B, not that A is necessary to make B happen.
Conditionals: Only A is B and the likeSo far, I have treated Only A is B as B-->A. So far so good. Recently, I have come across this question: Does the statement "only A is B" deny oth…
... assuming A assures B = A-->B)
2. does this render (anything not A) --> B a ... ) is true, this does not necessarily mean A = B, since there could
be other elements within B that is not A ...A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument?A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument? I know A ---Some--> C is an invalid argument, but I am unsure about the not so…
A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument?
I know A ---Some--> C is an invalid argument, but I am unsure about the not some situation.Diagramming either or and either or but not bothI understand the difference between either or and either or but not both I am confused about the diagramming aspect and not sure if my way is corr…
... not A -> B
not B -> A
A -> may or may not have B ... br />
A -> not B
B -> not A
In this ... a way to show this using double sided arrows or double not ... />
and double not arrows () are used for ...Superprep A, B and C game difficultyDid anyone else find these games sections more difficult than usual? I am a pretty consistent -0 to -2 on the games sections, but damn the A, B, and…
... difficult than usual? I am a pretty consistent -0 to -2 ... games sections, but damn the A, B, and C games sections are ... 3 and 4 on PT A each ate up like 12 ... be redoing these sections in a few weeks. Did anyone else ...Assumption of "/A -> /B " in the causal relationshipShould it be true that the assumption of "/A -> /B " in the causal relationship is A -> B
Should it be true that the assumption of "/A -> /B " in the causal relationship is A -> BSept. Extended Registration - not a July takerHey, I also missed the deadline of Sept. registration and I am not a July taker. However, I still went ahead to register the exam and I had no d…
... Sept. registration and I am not a July taker. However, I still ... registration process. But I did not receive the confirmation email (does ... cart." Does this mean I, a non-July taker, cannot register ...A/B Reading Passage - Tips?One of my biggest areas of weakness is the A/B Reading Passage. I know JY recommends starting with Passage A and answering every relevant question be…
One of my biggest areas of weakness is the A/B Reading Passage. I know JY recommends starting with Passage A and answering every relevant question before moving to Passage B. Is this the best approach? I would love suggestions on approaching this section.A->BWhen I see **A->B** structure in the stimulus, The right answers should be 1) **A->B** 2) /B->/A (contrapositive) The wrong answers should…
... be
1) **A->B**
2) /B->/A (contrapositive)
B (logical negation?)
2) /B->A (logical negation?)
3) /A->/B ... (mistaken negation)
4) B ...Where is the lesson on negating embedded conditional statements?I just need some clarification now how NOT (A--->B) turns into A and /B.
I just need some clarification now how NOT (A--->B) turns into A and /B.Conditional Logic - need help with interpretationI am confused between the difference of these two forms of conditional logic not A -> B not B -> A versus A -> not B B -> not A Do both…
... not A -> B
not B -> A
versus
A -> not B
B ... -> not A ... either or, but not both?
... presence of a sufficient condition ...Formal LogicOkay guys, this is pretty much my dumb down version of explaining some formal logic based on my knowledge. I believe this is something that needs to …
... :
If A-> Not B
If B-> Not A -------> That implies ... :
If Not A -> B
If Not B ->A ----------> That implies ... 3:
If not A ->not B
If B ->A ------------> That implies ...PT47 S1 Q24I don't understand why A can't be an answer and C is right. The stimulus said "Instruction is available-> consumers would find it much easier to p…
... -> consumers would "NOT" find it much easier ... 's like Instruction is NOT available-> consumers would ... find A-> NOT B (if the stimulus says A->B)?
So that's why I thought A ... just like A->Not B (But C is "NOT A->B")
...Embedded ConditionalHi Guys, I was trying to prove the following statement, please help to see if it is correct: (A-->B)-->C not (A-->B) or C (A some/and <…
...
(A-->B)-->C
not (A-->B) or C ...
(A ... some/and B) or ...
C->(A some/and B)
... , then some A are not B.what is the % range of the negation of "few"I know there are a few other threads like this but I didn't see a very concise answer I understand that few means some, most are not A <-s-> B …
... some, most are not
A B
and A --m-> /B
This ... negation would be all...not,
A --> /B (not 100%)
& ... ; it is not the case that (A ...Except, Without, UntilI have heard before that for except without until you are supposed to negate the necessary condition and the sufficient condition and turn it into th…
... stopping A (or B is necessary for not A). That would be (not) A -> B
ex. Spurs will sweep unless Heats wins a ... sweeping.
(not) Spurs sweep series -> Heats wins a gameDefining a causal relationshipPrior to the LSAT I've never really considered why A causes B. I'm very unsure of my definition of a causal relationship and would like to put it out…
... a definition here and not A B relationship. I'm saying "A causes B" ... the conclusion that a causation relationship does not exist, which ... to strengthen the argument a causation relationship does exist. ... 2 showing B does not occur in the absence of A.
...Where is the lesson on negating embedded conditional statements?I just need some clarification now how NOT (A--->B) turns into A and /B.
... /B. That proves that A does not lead to B. So A and /B occurring proves NOT (A ... ->B).
No candy is bitter is a ...Reversibility of "Some"Can anyone explain to me in detail why "some" statements with negations in them are reversible? For example, "A some /B" or "/A some B" I've been re…
... least 1 A and possibly all A's that are not a B.
... So like JY explains it:
A ...
A
NOT B are A
Incorrect: Somethings that are NOT A are B. ( ...a unless b but only if c.For instance, a -> (b -> c) simplifies to a + -b -> -c. What about (-a -> b) -> c. How can I simplify it?
... I get:
not (A -> B) would be A some -B
this ... I'm not so sure ... :
not (-A -> B ...a unless b but only if c.For instance, a -> (b -> c) simplifies to a + -b -> -c. What about (-a -> b) -> c. How can I simplify it?
... of not(A>B) would be "you can have A and not B." So not(-A>B ... ) would be "you can have not A and not B." (-A>B ... "you can have both out (not A and not B). I hope this helped.a unless b but only if c.For instance, a -> (b -> c) simplifies to a + -b -> -c. What about (-a -> b) -> c. How can I simplify it?
So,
(A -> B) -> C = not C -> A and not B
(not A -> B) -> C = not C -> not A and not B
A -> (B->C) = A and not B -> C
?How to improve mapping out logic?What lessons are the best to review for mapping out logic? Perhaps maybe a couple rule of thumbs to always go back to would be great! I use to do ver…
... is true of NOT A OR B because both conditions (NOT A, B) are FALSE in ... that says A->B NOT B -> NOT A That is, if A->B is a logically ... TRUE statement, then NOT B ...Is {A some /B} equal to {/A some B} ?I thought it was, but I'm second-guessing myself. Can you help me better understand this concept?
... first reads, "Some As are not Bs": So, if we have ... least one of them is not a B.
The second reads ... , "Some things that are not As, are Bs": There's ... statement. What isn't an A? Tons of things! So maybe ...
