HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| not | 65.1K | 113.9K |
| both | 9.5K | 11.7K |
| versus | 593 | 632 |
| always | 10.5K | 12.4K |
| apart | 873 | 980 |
-
Embedded BioconditionalsHello everyone, how do you draw out the logic for the following statement, and take the contrapositive. Statement: The only way to stop the bab…
... a Nip of Whiskey But not both could be translated as
not both. Which would be:
Note that both of these are equivalent to ... translate the thing into lawgic not using conditionals/biconditionals... but just ... -
PT21.S2.Q03 - a new medication for migraineI find abstract FL AC's to be quite a hassle on the LSAT. Usually I POE it down to one answer, which feels right, but I don't work through the FL if …
... to answer because I'm not entirely sure, but I don ... to make this into a not both relationship.
So for ... -
LG HelpI understand the 7sage method of improving on games (referring to the flowchart that is mentioned in the core curriculum) but I find that over the la…
... understanding what the difference between not-both and or rules are.
LG HelpI understand the 7sage method of improving on games (referring to the flowchart that is mentioned in the core curriculum) but I find that over the la…
... and out games have a "not both" rule. Meaning if you have ... out games that have a not both rule is to look for ... a situation that contains both elements with one pass and ... situation has neither element then both elements are together on the ...LG HelpI understand the 7sage method of improving on games (referring to the flowchart that is mentioned in the core curriculum) but I find that over the la…
... everything wrong) boils down to not recognizing the non-obvious in ... -out/grouping games. I'm not really sure how to improve ... the knowledge of what a not-both rule means.Why does JY write not-both rules asymmetrically?In the games videos, when JY sees the rule "if P, then not Q", he writes: P -> <del>Q</del> But when he sees "if Q, then not P" he writes: …
... . I personally use the standard not both for linking up different rules ... helpful but maybe not as helpful as putting both items in a ...Why does JY write not-both rules asymmetrically?In the games videos, when JY sees the rule "if P, then not Q", he writes: P -> <del>Q</del> But when he sees "if Q, then not P" he writes: …
@brennan said:
t seems to me that something like P Q would express the symmetry better
I think thats fine as long as you understand the relationship. The trick is in conditional chains when you have multiple things linking ...Why does JY write not-both rules asymmetrically?In the games videos, when JY sees the rule "if P, then not Q", he writes: P -> <del>Q</del> But when he sees "if Q, then not P" he writes: …
... . The absence of one does not guarantee the presence of the ...Embedded Conditionals IssueThis is a two part question in reference to the embedded conditionals video. https://7sage.com/lesson/mastery-embedded-conditional/ **Part 1:**…
... . See https://7sage.com/lesson/not-both-v-or-truth-tables/ if ...PTB.S2.G2 - an apartment building has five floorsIn the third rule, it says that if y is not in the park if either L or O is in the park, but then on the explanation, the sub game boards, he says th…
... see L or O but not both. In other words:
Y ... ----> L or O both
Lets tinker with ...
Y is in so both L and O are in ...
Y is in so both L and O
both L and O are allowed ...Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the RC sections.. That's not something I can fix. I ... to hear that. You are not alone when it comes to ... either RC or LG, but not both, then one of those is ...PT3.S2.Q04 - a work of architectureHello guys, Can someone please map out the logic of this argument and show how we can properly infer answer choice B? I am utterly confused :( …
In order to be both inviting and functional a work ... br /> obtrusive -> not inviting or not functional or not both
having knowledge ... of this if-then relationship is not ... produced buildings that are NOT unobtrusiveIn/Out games are the bane of my existenceMy biggest issue with logic games right now is timing, which I've had a lot of success in getting down for most game types. The one that I continue t…
... over, for there is really not much else they could do ... of visually representing "or" and "not both" rules, for it allows you ... would be mindful of "or/not both" rule when it's across ... , be extra cautious on: or/not both/bi-conditional rules, which would ...BiconditionalsPerhaps I missed something as I do not remember a lesson on biconditionals (double arrows). My understanding is that each term is both sufficient…
... some weird rules I had not encountered before. I still would ... don't understand the "but not otherwise" and how that translates ... />
A or B, but not both: A/B
A ... /> If A, then B, otherwise not: ? why or how does that ...I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
Thank you both. I've been studying logic ... to look for all the not both relationships X -> ~Y. I ... can't reverse and say not y gives x. I'm ... applies to just one or both rules?I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... " said:
> Thank you both. I've been studying logic ... to look for all the not both relationships X -> ~Y. I ... can't reverse and say not y gives x. I'm ... applies to just one or both rules?
Hey so ...I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... "either x or y but not both is in"??
Rule ... : Either X or Y or both are out
Master Game ... : Either X or Y but not both is in
Master Game ... got screwed up and does not show up properly when I ...I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... "either x or y but not both is in"??
>
both are out
So ...What does "or else" mean in sequencing games?Hey guys, Had a 7Sager email me with a question that I thought you guys could help out with. Here it is: ------------------------------------- …
... on 1 or 7, but not both, although it isn't explicitly ... stated.
Not sure I would've read ...What does "or else" mean in sequencing games?Hey guys, Had a 7Sager email me with a question that I thought you guys could help out with. Here it is: ------------------------------------- …
... rule is an exclusive or (not both) rule. H will either be ... will be on line 7 (not both if the the letters are ...BiconditionalsHi guys, I'm going through the biconditional part of the curriculum. Im wondering, for the Or, but not both biconditional, why don't we just write it…
... wondering, for the Or, but not both biconditional, why don't we ... above only accounts for the "not both" part of the sentence. Because ... is out. But it does not mean one of A **or ...BiconditionalsHi guys, I'm going through the biconditional part of the curriculum. Im wondering, for the Or, but not both biconditional, why don't we just write it…
... statement A or B but not both like Sami described above. ... B or 2, not B. The "exclusive not both or" means we ... necessity of a variable to not occur (being untrue/false). ... the "exclusive or"/not both variables absent and not both variables present expression, ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... .wu82" ! Those two statements are not the same thing. If A ... , then not B is represented as A ... ) and A or B, but not both is /A----->B ( /B ...advanced formal logic some and most inferenceHi guys, I am confused with a logic inference. According to a book, if A, then not B, can be notated like A-->/B or A<-|->B. However, in 7sage, i…
... -conditional. If A then not B is a not both rule: A ---> ... ; B, for it's not clear ... meaning of this statement does not equate a bi-conditional.
is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
Edit: Just saw the but not both. They are not the same thing.
not B (A->/B CP ... be
If A is not chosen (/A), now what? Nothing ... free to be chosen or not chosen
If B ... is not chosen (/B), now what? Again, ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... Just saw the but not both. They are not the same thing. < ... /> > If A is not chosen (/A), now what? Nothing ... free to be chosen or not chosen
> If ... B is not chosen (/B), now what? Again ... free to be chosen or not to be Chosen.
...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... of the elements in the "not both" MUST be selected. The initial ... said "A or B, but not both." Your biconditional would be the ... or B is selected, but not both." The way it is stated ... or B is selected, but not both," which renders your explanation accurate ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... milk or juice, but not both" is not the same thing as "One ... or juice is selected, but not both." The former leaves the possibility ... of not having either, and the latter ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... or B is selected, but not both" in this manner to eliminate ... . And at times, they might not write it that way, which ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... . The "A or B, but both both" is an exclusive or, which ... "A or B, **not both**" the "exclusive or" not the "inclusive or". I ... A, then not B" and "A or B, but not both" as separate ... conditions, are not the same thing.
