... ) would be a bi-conditional (alwaysapartnevertogether) and (2) would be a typical not-both rule. always apartnevertogetherbi-conditional?OR would the bi-conditional also be considered irrelevant ...
... to use a bi-conditionaland when to use a notboth rule? What triggers ... the use of a bi-conditional? The ... "notboth" rule, but could also speak as a bi-conditional [(either) or but notboth].
... necessarily created)? because they are alwaysapart/nevertogether?
>
> In ... **
If A and B **cannot be** togetherand A and B have to ... .com/discussion/#/discussion/14156/confusing-bi-conditional-vs-not-both-in-lg
... and N cannot always be selected together), would that turn this notboth ... rule into a biconditional (alwaysapart, nevertogether ...
If the conditional is confusing, think of the "notboth" rule as ...
... relationship has a necessary and sufficient condition, so they ... />
> K--------->/M and /M-------->K, with contrapositives ... if you get an alwaysapartnevertogether rule why you would ... the relationships that a bi-conditional **entails/contains** that ...
@Micaela_OVO
Thanks, if I add the word 'always' to that rule (M and N cannot always be selected together), would that turn this notboth rule into a biconditional (alwaysapart, nevertogether)?
... " said:
what would then "alwaysapart, nevertogether' rule look like?
always apart, nevertogether". For a standard in/out game, if you mean "M and ... this restricted case, and most of the time "nottogether" is not a biconditional.
... **alwaysapart, nevertogether biconditional because the rule states U and G ... both indicate the same idea that they have to be alwaysapart ... get /U ----> G and it's contrapositive /G ... know that they are alwaysapartandnevertogether. Both of our chains ...
... confused between the NotBoth Rule and the Biconditional (AlwaysTogether/NeverTogether) Rule. I ... as a NotBoth, and the second statement as a NeverTogether. So my ... rule as a [NotBoth Rule] or a [Nevertogether/alwaysapart Rule], especially under ...
... -out game), to translate "a and b cannot be on the ... may be)", then you use bi-conditionals. But if there are more ... , than you translate it as "not equal"
... to use notboth (F---->/C) vs a bi-conditional (F/C ... I should use the bi-conditional representation because it represents the ... or out together. Whereas I should use the notboth representation when ... the variables do not have to be together, there are other ...
... that this relationship would not constitute a bi-conditional, because we can ... irrelevant. If it were a bi-conditional, /z would have to ... and /v (v OUT). For this to be a bi-conditional would it not ... "either v or z, but notboth" ?
... through LG and I'm having issues with "notboth" "or" and biconditionals, particularly ... "notboth"? A list of common game rules that imply the neverapart biconditional ...
... bi-conditionaland therefore we could get the contrapositive of the bi-conditional by negating both ... the company will not allow her to ... sufficient assumption. This, together with the stimulus, ... argument, there are always infinitely many sufficient assumptions ...
... conditionals. I was always taught that to translate if and only if as bi-conditional ... bi-conditional. My question is that in some questiions 7Sage translates notboth into biconditional, and ... it as Not equal, as in they cannot appear together.
... D"
Is this actually bi-conditional in sinmple sequence game? not be necessary true, but for ... before get any replies...do not want to bother other ppl ...