HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| older | 2.1K | 2.6K |
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| as | 54.7K | 97.5K |
| practice | 12.7K | 17.3K |
-
PT Advice for September 2017 LSATHello! I've read a lot of different discussions about this, but I can't find anything that specifically answers my questions. I have taken 11 PTs…
... completed PT 62-71 so now I am back to using older ... to take those 20 (plus PT 71 which I saved) but ... -
LSAT test 2 months away-still struggling with logical reasoningHi everyone, I have already written the LSAT once, scoring a 151 in December 2016. I realized on my first go, I did not master logical reasoning a…
... not master logical reasoning as for when it came ... -30 ( I am on PT number 16 now, I have ... affairs), and continue to practice my LG sections (1- ... on these questions in untimed practice. Where before I was going ... newer lsats 60-80 as soon as possible in order to ... -
Complacency killsIn the military we used this saying all the time, "Complacency kills". I just learned today that this saying is just as apt to the LSAT as it was in …
... is just as apt to the LSAT as it was ... the CC and during practice I did not miss ... I missing this many during PT's?
... most basic foundations. Something as little as this can cost you ... .
As for me ------ Lesson learned. -
Timed Section before a PT?Hi all :) In my timed PTs, I always tank the first LR section... a VERY poor performance. I _think_ this can be attributed to my brain not being w…
... brain not being warmed up? As a solution, would it make ... LR section prior to the PT?
If yes, a concern ... , do I take a timed PT at home before driving to ... maybe an hour before the PT and then maybe a LG ... -
HELP! Advice on Retake: aiming for t14Fellow 7sagers, I'm in a bind and am in serious need of advice. So it's already been about 10 months since I first started studying for the LSAT, …
... is far below my average PT score. I know that 166 ... take it one last time, as I feel like giving up ... 've used up all the practice tests, gone over the 7sage ... 'm just a bit lost as to how I should approach ... -
September Study Group | PT 65 | Sunday, July 23 @ 7p EDT / 6p CST / 4p PST | Last Public Post**_Last public post. I'm lazy and I don't like making new posts every week. Also, going private. If you don't show up and give us a compelling rea…
... br />
###Test Details:
**PT:** 65
**Experimental Section:** LR1 ...
For our full PT schedule please see the following ... br /> * Please take the PT under strictly timed conditions.
as long as possible to get the ... -
[Ended] That'sSoRavenclaw | PT 67, LR | Tues. July 25th | 6pm ESTWe'll be starting with RC on Sunday and then continue LR on Tuesday. Here's to hoping that with more practice we'll look at the test more like how …
... to hoping that with more practice we'll look at the ... way around).
PT 67 w/experimental RC fr ... logic, etc; Come to each PT review sessions with at least ... -
Practice Test Inconsistency:I have the LSAT Starter course and have completed the CC. I have been practice testing now and am slated to take the test in September. My PT scor…
... the CC. I have been practice testing now and am slated ... in September.
My PT scores range from 158 (my ... -
Okay, is the issue reading faster, working more efficiently, drilling more LR or all three?LR is absolutely smacking me. I have done aprox. 30 PT with the most recent one being Being PT46. On the early PT i was scoring 165-172. But as the p…
... . I have done aprox. 30 PT with the most recent one ... the early PT i was scoring 165-172. But as the pretests ... a matter of needing more practice with LR? By drilling old ... -
(Another) Question about BR'ing PT'sHey Everyone, Hope everyone is progressing through their studies. I had a quick question regarding BR methods for PT's. I have heard several peop…
... regarding BR methods for PT's. I have heard ... continue fool proofing LG as they PT. I think that this ... me). After taking the PT, should I watch the ... thinking that I could PT in the morning, BR ... sound feasible?
As always, thank you for your ...
