HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| only | 26K | 33.3K |
| if | 76.2K | 134.7K |
| logical | 3K | 3.9K |
| indicator | 851 | 1.1K |
-
PTB.S1.Q8 - Economist: In the interaction betweenMy question is how to translate: the only obligation is to act in the best interests of their own side. Does obligation here act as a necessity indic…
... this - isn't "the only" a sufficient indicator? I diagrammed it the ... the Process above and did "If obligation, then act in best ... -
Should we skip the Logic Games curriculumNow that logic games won't be featured on the LSAT anymore, should we just skip the logic games curriculum on 7sage? I know that there are a few l…
... if you are struggling with that skill or implementing the logical indicator phrases ... -
PT51.S1.Q21 - garden and adjoining living room separatedCan someone explain what role "even if" plays in (D)? I was able to eliminate all of them except (D) so I picked it. Turns out, I got lucky. I…
... someone explain what role "even if" plays in (D)?
if a sufficient condition so ... it? Or is even if similar to only if?
On a side note I only ... />
Not sure if this LR section was easier ... -
IF AND ONLY IFCan someone explain to me the implication of this statement? I know it sets up a two way street between the two terms but why is that the case???
Can someone explain to me the implication of this statement? I know it sets up a two way street between the two terms but why is that the case??? -
Defining a causal relationshipPrior to the LSAT I've never really considered why A causes B. I'm very unsure of my definition of a causal relationship and would like to put it out…
... .
A causes B if and only if
1. B ... /> 2. B does not occur if A does not occur (B ... -
conditional chain linkage with "if but only if"/double arrowHi guys, So I know that for example A ---> B <--|--> C leads to the inference A <--|--> C, whereas A <--|--> B ---- > C leads to no useful inferen…
Hi guys,
So I know that for example A ---> B C leads to the inference A C, whereas A B ---- > C leads to no useful inference. What about the double arrow? i.e.
1) A B ---> C
2) A ---> B C
my ... -
Skype Study Buddy or BuddiesI'm looking for a study buddy or buddies to review via skype. We can work out a study regimen that works for both parties. Please reach out only if y…
... both parties. Please reach out only if you've gone through most ... -
Main Point/Conclusion QuestionsI'm having what I think is a weird issue. I'm not doing well with the MP/MC questions but I seem to be doing ok with the other questions. Doesn't tha…
... . Doesn't that seem odd? If I'm having trouble with ... as far as LR questions? If you can't identify the ... can determine the main conclusion if the indicator words are there but ... not so much if they're not ... -
LG Rule with 'otherwise'Hello! Simple question + looking for confirmation. If a rule says: If Sarah is cool, she will go to the party with her sister; otherwise, she w…
... confirmation.
If a rule says: If Sarah is cool, she ... that this is like an 'if and only if' rule... can someone comment ... -
a unless b but only if c.For instance, a -> (b -> c) simplifies to a + -b -> -c. What about (-a -> b) -> c. How can I simplify it?
For instance, a -> (b -> c) simplifies to a + -b -> -c. What about (-a -> b) -> c. How can I simplify it? -
PT60.S3.Q18 - activities that pose risks to lifehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-18/ I had a lot of trouble with this question picking between A/C (reasons outlined …
... pose a risk are acceptable if and only if they satisfy any of ... -
Circular Reasoning QuestionsHi everyone, Could someone please give me an example of a question in which the correct answer would be "Appeals to a premise one would accept onl…
... a premise one would accept only if one already accepted the truth ... access to PT 44-65 if you know of one in ... -
Video ExplanationsHey guys quick question, I recently purchased the starter pack and can't seem to find video explanations for logical reasoning. It only says logical …
Hey guys quick question, I recently purchased the starter pack and can't seem to find video explanations for logical reasoning. It only says logical games explanations. Do I need to upgrade for the LR explanations? -
Diagramming either or and either or but not bothI understand the difference between either or and either or but not both I am confused about the diagramming aspect and not sure if my way is corr…
... diagramming aspect and not sure if my way is correct
if and only if" and "if but only if"
and ... -
Games by 7Sagers: My Coffee Needs a Seat (April Fools Edition)@pseudonymous made this look REALLY easy. If you find any errors I will make you a custom meme or avatar of your choice. @"Al [^-^d]" @blah170blah @…
... across from one another if and only if there are exactly three ... Emli.
Dillon can only sit next to one other ... Pseudonymous
4. If Nilesh sits directly across from ... e. Pseudonymous
5. If Nilesh sits directly across from ... -
Project Request/ChallengeI see some people who are getting creative with their own methods of prep, such as making lists, making excel documents to test inferences, and the l…
... before D, Z is 3rd if and only if Y is 7th, B ... is on Tuesday or Wednesday if C ... -
Question regarding with basic translation group 1 and group 2GROUP 1: IF, WHEN, WHERE, ALL, THE ONLY, EVERY, ANY, WHENEVER, ANYONE & GROUP 2: ONLY, ONLY IF, ONLY WHEN, ONLY WHERE, ALWAYS, REQUIRES, MUST (Group …
... , ANYONE & GROUP 2: ONLY, ONLY IF, ONLY WHEN, ONLY WHERE, ALWAYS, REQUIRES, MUST (Group ... example, "the only" is from group 1, while "only, only if" are from group ... 2; "when" is from group 1, while "only ... -
General Logical Indicator QuestionThis might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT que…
This might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT question? For instance pt 27 st 1 q 17, I started reading the stem and noticed the logic and diagram quickly ... -
BR Groups, Week of August 19th: Weds (PT63), Sat (PT64)<b>All groups now meeting at 7pm ET. Folks with schedule restraints—please just join when you can. You won't miss much. Any serious objections, pleas…
... . Schedules can be changed but only if you let me know!!
Only 6 more LSATurdays to go ... nikkers625 .
For the regulars: If for some reason you're ... a person exist?).
The only expectation anyone has for these ... -
BR Groups, Week of August 26th: Weds (PT65), Sat (PT66)<b>All groups now meeting at 7pm ET. Folks with schedule restraints—please just join when you can. You won't miss much. Any serious objections, pleas…
... . Schedules can be changed but only if you let me know!!
For the regulars: If for some reason you're ... a person exist?).
The only expectation anyone has for these ... -
BR Groups, Week of September 2nd: Weds (PT67)<b>All groups now meeting at 7pm ET. Folks with schedule restraints—please just join when you can. You won't miss much. Any serious objections, pleas…
... . Schedules can be changed but only if you let me know!!
For the regulars: If for some reason you're ... a person exist?).
The only expectation anyone has for these ... -
BR Groups, Week of September 9th: Weds (PT68), Fri (PT69), Sat (PT70)<b>All groups now meeting at 7pm ET. Folks with schedule restraints—please just join when you can. You won't miss much. Any serious objections, pleas…
... . Schedules can be changed but only if you let me know!!
For the regulars: If for some reason you're ... a person exist?).
The only expectation anyone has for these ... -
UPDATED BR Groups, Week of September 15th: **Thurs** (PT72), Sat (PT73)<b>All groups now meeting at 7pm ET. Folks with schedule restraints—please just join when you can. You won't miss much. Any serious objections, pleas…
... . Schedules can be changed but only if you let me know!!
only), September 17th at 7PM ET ... nikkers625 .
For the regulars: If for some reason you're ... a person exist?).
The only expectation anyone has for these ... -
Advice for future plan of attackHi all, I can't resist reaching out to you all for some advice, as it's been so quality in the past! I've finished both the course and LSAT tra…
... I know), and wondering if I should suspend PTs and ... panicking a bit and I only got to 3 of ... sections.
I only got through about half the ... bundle, but not sure if I should suspend PTs in ... Dec test, but obviously only if that is the most beneficial ... -
Question about "or" rules from the trainer (page 197)I don't see how "H will go before G if and only if H is after F" translates to G-H-F as one of the two possibilities. (The second one was: F-…
I don't see how "H will go before G if and only if H is after F" translates to
G-H-F as one of the two possibilities.
(The second one was: F-H-G and I understand this)
Halp plz! -
50.2.11 Cynthia: Corporations amply fundI understand how E is correct, but what makes A incorrect? Doesn't Cynthia think that if a project seeks to further our theoretical understanding,…
... /> Doesn't Cynthia think that if a project seeks to further ... think that Get government funding only if expected to yield practical applications ... -
Are these valid arguments, and how do I properly diagram them? (Please help)1. People with long legs make good runners. Everyone in Ashley's family has long legs. Therefore, Ashley would make a good runner. (I think it's a ba…
... are by a wide variety if artists, it follows that the ... will become a best-seller only if it has a romantic setting ... Angeles buys gasoline on Mondays only. But almost everyone in Los ... Angeles buys groceries on Tuesday only. It follows that fewer than ... -
How do you diagram this?I've been reading the LSAT trainer and am a little confused about the diagramming of the bi-conditional. One question was: L will go before J if …
... : L will go before J if and only if L is after G ... -
Morning of the test brain warmup?Does anyone have any advice for the morning of the test on how to get your brain awake? I know there have been plenty of posts about a good breakfast…
... ) and quickly reviewing the four logical indicator groups the morning of the ... -
63.3.11 People who browseCompletely missed this one; I really don't see how B is a necessary assumption. Can someone breakdown by B is necessary? People on the Internet s…
... they diagnose themselves? What if they use something else instead ... typically" is too strong. We only need people to diagnose themselves ... general, and our premise only states that quackery is appealing ... .
Answer E: Only if? Way too strong.
