I had seen an earlier comment by pacifico hence posted this question. I think the clean copy is to avoid any biases , see how you think in absence of pressure vs in presence of it.
@Pacifico's approach to RC timing sounds right to me, although I might check a bit more frequently during the last passage to make sure I didn't run out of time.
@Pacifico I wouldn't say there are contradictory rules, but that in some worlds the application of the rules contradict each other. At least I haven't seen any. If 2 rules contradict each other from the outset, it seems the game would be impossible.
so just to make this clear, the foolproof method is doing each logic GAME back to back? I've been redoing the entire section multiple times back to back.... but I should be practicing each separate game instead? Sorry if this is a dumb question @Pacifico