I spent a lot of time on my formal logic so I didn't really need to diagram on paper. If I did diagram, it would be on a tough parallelreasoning or MBT question. Probably 1 or 2 questions per test?
... two layered logic in its reasoning and the author was ambivalent ... . Not too many time waster parallelreasoning questions, except for a super ...
... two layered logic in its reasoning and the author was ambivalent ... . Not too many time waster parallelreasoning questions, except for a super ...
... two layered logic in its reasoning and the author was ambivalent ... . Not too many time waster parallelreasoning questions, except for a super ...
... two layered logic in its reasoning and the author was ambivalent ... . Not too many time waster parallelreasoning questions, except for a super ...
... two layered logic in its reasoning and the author was ambivalent ... . Not too many time waster parallelreasoning questions, except for a super ...
... two layered logic in its reasoning and the author was ambivalent ... . Not too many time waster parallelreasoning questions, except for a super ...
... two layered logic in its reasoning and the author was ambivalent ... . Not too many time waster parallelreasoning questions, except for a super ...
I got a 180 and diagram frequently. Probably ~2-3 problems per LR section. Usually one of the difficult parallelreasoning questions and one MBT or Sufficient.
For many of the questions after the lessons I will get like 7 or 8 out of 11 but in LR I will get about 12 or 13 out of 25. My main weaknesses are must be true and parallelreasoning.
... long formal logic questions, long parallelreasoning questions, tough sufficient assumption questions ... structure if it is a parallel question) and take a pass ...