@runiggyrun thanks for detail explanation I saw this happen in the PT 26 game 4 with a sub-category that have one out spot only V,Z,Y and Z is always in and by splitting the game board based on V,Z,Y the game is solved completely.
anyone without a LR experimental get a parallel reasoning about chocolate desserts being fatty and high calories? Was my 3rd LR and 2nd 26 question one.
Was also a flawed reasoning question about a breakfast cereal having whole grains.
Sounds like 26 LR section with the national ... they were questions 24 and 26, with the CEO/lawyer one ... />
Pity. I thought the other 26 LR was a lot easier.
@ethan.ames 2 political parties question that also listed a name of 1 candidate for each of the parties? I had an experimental 26 question LR, so that would of been from your 26 question LR.
He is the guy. The debt episode scared me so much that I read consumer rights against collection agencies in my province (living in Canada). The showing up in court if they sue you is the part that everyone should know about
LSAT Logic in Everyday Life is one Podcast that I enjoyed and found valuable. They are a bit old, but I believe still relevant. These lessons are not going to teach you how to conquer the LSAT, but will help you begin thinking differently.
I was thinking more or less the same thing whenI was watching this episode. I even mentioned to my wife that everybody was pretty logic-happy this episode, especially in the Jon-Wildling scene.