HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| premise | 2.4K | 4.3K |
| indicator | 851 | 1.1K |
-
PT68.S3.Q20 - scientist: given the human tendencyhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-68-section-3-question-20/ I was not sure between B and D. I thought B is correct because it bases its conc…
... it bases its conclusion on premise which contradicts one of its ... premise...
(It says "the odds ... -
PT68.S3.Q16 - political scientist: people become unenthusiastichttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-68-section-3-question-16/ So I was not sure about the term switching..."the most important problems" in the…
... and "important problems" in the premise. So I expected to see ... -
PT9.S2.Q13 - criticism that the press pandersI am having hell of a hard time figuring this one out; I have 3 issues here: <b> If the press were not profit making the only alternative is subsid…
... "the only" is group 1 indicator and I changed my diagram ... -
PT67.S2.Q20 - astronomer: earth was bombardedhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-67-section-2-question-20/ I am having a lot of trouble seeing how C and D are not saying the same exact thi…
... of the argument.
Premise: Mars escaped severe bombardment by ... asteroids.
Major Premise/Minor Conclusion: There could have ... life on Earth.
Premise: Many meteorites originating from Mars ... -
Sufficiency and necessity vs Premise and conclusion.What is the overlap between these two concepts? It seems like answer choices need to be on a certain side of the arrow to be correct.
What is the overlap between these two concepts? It seems like answer choices need to be on a certain side of the arrow to be correct. -
PT52.S1.Q22 - moralist: a statement is whollyI found this comment posted on the PT explanation page And I was wondering if anyone could answer what this person has to say because I'm in the same…
... part(s) is/are a premise. However, I’m not always ... -
PT24.S4.G4 - nine different treatments are availablehttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-4-game-4/ Hi guys, I got a problem with translation of last rule of Game 4 of PT 24.It would be …
... .
Can, is a indicator (negate necessary) which in this ... -
PT11.S2.Q06 - cigarette smoking has been shownThis is a principle question. I got this wrong in both drilling and blind review. So I thought I am looking for something that will do the fol…
... the following:
connect the premise to the conclusion
SO ... -
Different uses for orHi guys, Im wondering if I have the concept of "or" down. So first it can be used as a group 3 indicator to split the sentence into a conditional sta…
... used as a group 3 indicator to split the sentence into ... -
Cancel September LSAT?Hi, This past week hit me with a wave of anxiety and I'm not sure if its because I'm just nervous for the test or if I'm not actually prepared or r…
... components and analyzing the conclusion premise etc. I'm trying to ... -
basic translations questionSo I'm just wrapping up learning the four basic groups and have a question on groups three and four. I know it doesn't matter which one you pick as l…
... and make it the sufficient indicator and the second the necessary ... -
PT78.S3.Q23 - a spy fails by being caughtHey everyone, I'm having difficulty determining how the conclusion of the passage is the conclusion. I thought the conclusion was "I was late to m…
... a different day" is a premise because it's trying to ... -
Ideas about foolproofing LRHey everyone, I just wanted to get different ideas of how I can possibly go about reviewing LR questions that I have done during a timed test tha…
... copy of the stimulus. Mark premise and conclusion. And if possible ... -
PT76.S2.Q24 - it has been said that authors who writelawlz so this question is a monster, but watching JY's explanation helped. https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-76-section-2-question-24/ He ex…
... out to us as a premise? Shouldn't we just accept ... -
Checking understanding for "or"Hi guys had a question regarding or. To determine whether or not it is the "inclusive" or "and" interpretation we use context. For exclusive interpre…
Hi guys had a question regarding or. To determine whether or not it is the "inclusive" or "and" interpretation we use context. For exclusive interpretation we are to use a a biconditional indicator to show one or the other?
Correct me if I am wrong. -
Finding The AssumptionI have been doing the CC and have stumbled a bit on the strengthen portion of things. Once I hit the 3 star questions, I was getting about 60 percent…
... to bridge the gap between premise and conclusion. Is there anything ... -
PT76.S2.Q25 - new TV programs will be canceledI got this question right first but after BR when I just solved it with my logical intuition, but I got wrong since I made some logical diagram for t…
... , doesn't it help the premise (NS->PD) to create ... -
PT75.S3.Q04 - the size of the spleenhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-75-section-3-question-04/ So for some reason I treated this as conditional question. So I thought Premi…
... .
So I thought
Premise: (stimulus)
A (sickly birds ... -
PT26.S3.Q22 - whenever she considers votingSo I work on this question. It takes "otherwise" as indicator for bicondition. I wonder which course JY mention about "otherwise" https://7sage.com/…
So I work on this question. It takes "otherwise" as indicator for bicondition. I wonder which course JY mention about "otherwise"
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-26-section-3-question-22/ -
Causal Argument and ConditionalityI think I am confused with causal argument and conditionality. I felt when causal argument has something to do with explanation, giving explanation…
... /> However, if there is a premise describing a causal relationship, would ... -
A cause BWhen there is a premise saying A cause B, For example. A. Premise(1): A Cause B Premise(2). There is B Conclusion: There is A Is this a valid …
When there is a premise saying A cause B, For ... example.
A.
Premise(1): A Cause B
Premise(2). There is B
... is valid reasoning, right?
Premise(1): A Cause B
Premise(2). There is A
... -
If only "only" stops giving me so much trouble...Hey guys, I am currently reading thru the Trainer to enhance 7sage CC, while I find the vast majority of the content are extremely consistent to our …
... /> In our CC the logical indicator "only" is group 2,which ... -
PT31.S3.Q12 - several recent studiesHi Gents and ladies, Just a curious note on a confusion that I have. Question is here: https://7sage.com/lesson/serious-medical-condition-weaken…
... says don't question the premise, but isn't A doing ... -
PT45.S4.Q18 - decentralization enables divisionshttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-45-section-4-question-18/ I'm pulling my hair out as I am trying to figure out why the correct answer for P…
... "always" is a necessary condition indicator word and I assumed this ... -
Tough question save for later?Hi team, Just a curious note. Please let me know your thoughts. I had just finished the weakening question sets. I did them by writing it out…
... out by pen: each context, premise, and conclusion while also, trying ... -
[Study Guide]: Principle Question SubtypesFor those of you on the PT 55 BR call -- sorry it took me so long to get this up, but below are my notes on Principle questions and subtypes. Please …
... directly link up with some premise/assumption in the argument to ... today.
Answer choice (specific premise):
At some point today ... -
PT55.S1.Q06 - teaching students calculushttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-06/ I had gone over this question during Saturday's BR call and I got some great fe…
... with this answer choice. The premise says "before they are ready ... -
PT68.S3.Q24 - in the riverview buildingI am not sure why answer choice D in question 68 section 3 of PT 68 is incorrect. Here is an explanation for why I think D can be considered the corr…
...
Take contrapositive of premise #1 and conclusion (assumption #1 ... -
PT79.S1.Q07 - journalist: the new mayorWhat is the first sentence? I thought this is the conclusion because it says "undeniably"... and all the rest are premise :(
What is the first sentence?
I thought this is the conclusion because it says "undeniably"...
and all the rest are premise :(
