... #1 response.' PT 138 Section 3 Question4 also involves this verbiage; 'the ... , see PT 131 Section 3 Question 7. PT B Section4Question 18 involves the ... of examples (from across 12 prep tests!) and there are many ...
This question kinda had me befuddled in my initial PT and my blind review, and still I am struggling to understand the question after both. Any chance someone has a better idea of how we can arrive at the answer being C using the question stimulus?
I just took my second preptest on Lawhub and none of ... didn't do the second test through the 7Sage site but ... linked (it grabbed my first preptest). Until it is updated I ...
you can also use this structure for a url:http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-17/ but type in which test, section and question number
... influence how hard a LR question is to reason through: Question 16)
2.A "non ... 'm thinking here of PT77-Section4-Question 20)
3. Very tricky ... something like 54-2-18) 4. For me, any "except" question is ...
...
1. Take a PrepTest on Monday (after work) and ... PrepTest Tuesday through Friday.
3. Blind Review Saturday PrepTest ... on Sunday. 4. After taking four Prep Tests ...
8. Drill your weakest section for 35 minutes on Friday ...
... little, they really only test a small set of abilities ... experience that these questions test our ability to tell ... . In essence, these questions test our ability to understand the ... particularly daunting example: PT 27 Section4Question 14. What I recommend ...
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section4question 20.
> @akistotle said:
> I once tried to make a list of all the common flaws.....But then I gave up. :sweat: So here is a partial list:
>
> **5) Causation confusions (correlation-causation flaws)**
> PT20.S1.Q10; ...