HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| prep | 8.3K | 11.3K |
| test | 39.8K | 70.8K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 4 | 14.5K | 19.8K |
| q16 | 167 | 183 |
-
Necessary Assumption Questions - Be Wary of Conditional Statements?Hey all. I've noticed the more recent exams have a lot of difficult necessary assumption questions. Another thing I noticed was that these questi…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-73-section-4-question-26/
Look ... how tempting answer choice B is. After deliberating for a ... -
Necessary Assumption Questions - Be Wary of Conditional Statements?Hey all. I've noticed the more recent exams have a lot of difficult necessary assumption questions. Another thing I noticed was that these questi…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-73-section-4-question-26/
>
B is. After deliberating for a ... -
PT67.S4.Q08 - if the burden of a proposed policy changeHello! I was hoping to get some clarification on this question. So clearly our right answer should link the reintroduction of rock salt to a dispr…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-67-section-4-question-08/
This ... should be halted
(B) is incorrect because the principle ... -
PT27.S4.Q07 - if you know a lot about historyI get why Answer choice D is correct. But I am not wholly convinced why answer choice B is wrong. Would love any input :) https://7sage.com/ls…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-27-section-4-question-07/
... br /> A —> B
———
/A —> /B
... sufficiency-necessity confusion flaw. B is wrong because it does ... on why you think B could be describing the ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... . Killed it
Section 4: RC. Killed it
Section 5: LR. Killed ... feels like a really bad test--like I underperformed my average ... . By the end of section 2, the test really felt like it ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... : LG. Killed it
> Section 4: RC. Killed it
> ... feels like a really bad test--like I underperformed my average ... . By the end of section 2, the test really felt like it ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... : LG. Killed it
> Section 4: RC. Killed it
> ... feels like a really bad test--like I underperformed my average ... . By the end of section 2, the test really felt like it ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... a total fog about the test. Was extraordinarily nervous opening that ... on the 26 question LR (section 4 for me). I am fairly ... particular questions wrong on that section, and probably more.
test, the more I become convinced ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... : LG. Killed it
> Section 4: RC. Killed it
> ... feels like a really bad test--like I underperformed my average ... . By the end of section 2, the test really felt like it ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... total fog about the test. Was extraordinarily nervous opening ... the 26 question LR (section 4 for me). I am ... particular questions wrong on that section, and probably more.
test, the more I become ... holistic an experience this test is, so I ... -
With 2 real LSATs under my belt, and one still fresh, AMA if you are curious about real test vs. PTsHey all, I wanted to do this as a favor for people who have yet to take a real LSAT. Saturday was my 2nd real LSAT. I sat for the September 2016 and …
... me is the experimental section will play mind games ... section was the difficult RC, the whole rest of the test ... experimental. When I started section 3 I was SUPER ... a single question. Then section 4 was LR again....and it ... This definitely changes the test as well. -
PT30.S4.Q02 - the current theory about earthquakesIs the sentence that starts with "As plausible as this may sound, at least one thing remains mysterious...," the conclusion of this stimulus? So t…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-02/
Yeah ... /> For example if answer choice B is the main point: the ... -
Anxiety Issues with the timer while PTingHi everyone, My biggest issue right now is not freaking out while taking timed prep tests and I'm stuck on how to get over this feeling. I'm BRing…
... freaking out while taking timed prep tests and I'm ... sit down to take a prep test and I start the timer ... sitting down to take a test but it doesn't ... is to do an untimed section and at the end see ... my own strategies finish the section earlier than time is called ... -
Vice article -- LSAT with no prephttps://www.vice.com/en_us/article/3kvv3n/i-took-the-lsat-with-zero-preparation Came across this earlier today and thought I'd share. Interesting …
I took the September test with my only studying being taking the free prep test months earlier and ended up with a 163 (-12 on LG) so I don't find the article that surprising. That being said, I definitely got lucky with some guesses on the LG section. -
Stuck with prep, need some test taking advice!Yesterday I finally finished the curriculum part of the course and decided to take my first PTA to see how much I've learned. To be frank, the whole …
... for each section in isolation before combining them in a prep test. Here ... night of a play. The prep tests are dress rehearsals. But ... Then take a second RC section and repeat. Any changes? Noticed ... wrong. Try taking the next section lightning fast. Check back in ... -
PT 82 BR Sessions with J.Y. [Spoiler Warning]Hey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 82 (September 2017 LSAT). I'm holding 6 sessions total. 2 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session w…
LR section 4 question #14 good lord help me with this question ☹️. I got it to 50/50 B and E. What in the world....HALP!
How do they both not weaken? How are they not almost saying like the same thing?! -
Feeling discouraged...Recommendations?Over my last 5 tests I have averaged a 156.6. With my high being a 160. My goal is a 167. I took the LSAT in September with a 155 and I've signed up …
... you move through the test. Honestly, your prep test scores despite seeming like ... the patterns of how the test works. Like i said ... 6 months preparing for this test. According to Gladwell, Keller ... excellence, they recommend dedicating 3-4 hours per day to a ... -
How much should I do before December 2017?With about two weeks left until the test, I am wondering how many PTs I should take and what to focus on. I've been studying for a year and have …
... compared to the quantity of prep you have already done ... is to walk into the test comfortable and score at ... 4. I'd probably also mix in a little other prep ... time for the September test, I took 4 PTs a week most ... the last twenty PTs by 4 and tied my previous ... -
Published data: relative difficulty of sections?I know that some sections of the same type are tougher than others. Does 7Sage or anyone else publish data about the relative difficulty of differen…
... most missed questions per test receiving a "4-star" ranking. You could ... tell you how difficult the section will be for you (because ... many people struggled with the section or not. If a particular ... 'd consider that a difficult section.
But again, ... -
Last minute tips for December test dayHey guys! I was just wondering if anyone has any tips for taking the lsat or how to approach test day. Saturday will be here before we know it so I’m…
... of the test.
>
> + One with 4 real sections ... /> >
> + One with 4 real sections and RC experimental ... /> >
> + One with 4 real sections and LR experimental ... I thought it was one section for all! Thanks for the ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... LR each, -0 LG, and -4 RC, but I am sure ... LG with RC on this test. The subway game really slowed ... really sad when I opened section 4 and saw RC. I was ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... LR each, -0 LG, and -4 RC, but I am sure ... LG with RC on this test. The subway game really slowed ... really sad when I opened section 4 and saw RC. I was ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... LR each, -0 LG, and -4 RC, but I am sure ... LG with RC on this test. The subway game really slowed ... really sad when I opened section 4 and saw RC. I was ... design a really hard LG section without adding a fancy, unorthodox ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
I had two LG (Sections 3 and 4). Thought section 4 was a little bit easier, more traditional. Both were tough in that I had a tough time making initial inferences. I just had to brute force try things. Thought the rest of the test was fair. -
PT19.S4.Q11 - five thousand of the 50,000 books publishedhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-11/ (B) None of the films released in country Z in 1992 were based on books other t…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-11/
P ... , it becomes valid.
(B): SA: based on the novels ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
• **Bi-conditional** (A /B; "**Or, but not both rule**": ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-4-game-1/) as an In ... /> • **Not both rule** (A ---> /B)
PT16 S1 Game ... we have Bi-conditional (A /B) in Grouping games, but that ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... :
> • **Bi-conditional** (A /B; "**Or, but not both rule ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-4-game-1/) as an In ... • **Not both rule** (A ---> /B)
>
> PT16 ... we have Bi-conditional (A /B) in Grouping games, but that ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > > • **Bi-conditional** (A /B; "**Or, but not both rule ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-4-game-1/) as an In ... • **Not both rule** (A ---> /B)
> >
> ... we have Bi-conditional (A /B) in Grouping games, but that ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... :
> • **Bi-conditional** (A /B; "**Or, but not both rule ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-4-game-1/) as an In ... • **Not both rule** (A ---> /B)
>
> PT16 ... we have Bi-conditional (A /B) in Grouping games, but that ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > > • **Bi-conditional** (A /B; "**Or, but not both rule ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-4-game-1/) as an In ... • **Not both rule** (A ---> /B)
> >
> ... we have Bi-conditional (A /B) in Grouping games, but that ...
