Currently fool proofing 1-35 LG however I want to make sure my LR skills (or lack thereof) are not diminishing. I have saved some problem sets from the CC but after I finish these should I start from PT#1 and drill by question type or whole sections?
while going through the CC, should I go to the question bank and drill questions from PT1-16? Or should I drill those questions after i'm done with the CC? Or is there another point of view??
I know there is an answer to this question out there, but I am really confused on the conditional logic here. If someone can break that down for me, it would greatly help me understand when the other answer choices are wrong and further help me see why D ...
Is there somewhere on 7sage to purchase the logic games bundle to foolproof the games. I thought I had seen it somewhere but now I can't seem to find it.
... through all the games from PT1-40 multiple times, I often ... -0, but I also make 1 or 2 stupid mistakes that ... I do sometimes have about 1 wrong too.
This question presents the cheetah as an exception to the coat pattern attributed to large cat species. From the stimulus, we know that Living/Hunting Habitats have an impact on the type of Coat a large cat has. We also know that, normally, Spotted Coat -& ...
I am still quite confused about why answer choice D is wrong here. After all, couldn't it be argued that P is proposing a hypothesis (that M's hypothesis is laughable) and showing that it is merely possible (by stating that it ...
... I've taken 4 PT's so far and despite ... - 6 on my last PT (my best LG score). ... drill the clean games from PT1 - 16, and I have ... to be taking more PT's at this point.< ... LG first before serious PT'ing or is it ... as well along with regular PT'ing?
... foolproofed all the games from PT's 16 - 35 and ... then started taking PT's. Seeing how low my ... schedule by drilling games from PT1-15, and foolproofing newer ... games from the PT's I'm taking. ... new game from these old PT's. Also, among the ...
Can anybody help me with this question, because it is driving me crazy.
Why is B wrong? The stimulus clearly states "**any**given individual molecule of substance can activate..." how is this statement not supporting B?
And how can C be ...
I'm confused as to why we ruled out spent fuel rods on the basis that they never contain "significant" quantities of tellurium isotopes? In the first sentence of the stimulus, it just states that they found "radioactive isotopes of iodine, tellurium, and ...
... a bit discouraged after taking PT 57 (the section with the ... already taken full practice tests: PT1-20, and a couple from ... test. I'm currently drilling PT 21-35 (games only), foolproofing ...