HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.9K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 17 | 1.2K | 1.4K |
-
Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... practice tests (PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser" and PT 3 Section 2 #3 "In Europe ... .
For #3 from PT 3 section 2, I was between answer ... -
PT 41, Section 3, Question 3I don't know why this trips me up SO BADLY, but I ended up switching this one to the correct answer in my BR. BUT, I watched the video and I reasone…
I don't know why this trips me up SO BADLY, but I ended up switching this one to the correct answer in my BR.
BUT, I watched the video and I reasoned it differently.
We're taught that, if we're given a premise, we have to take it to be true, ... -
Science Experiments in LR QuestionsPowerscore claims that recently PTs have had a lot more science experiment questions in LR. I've obviously taken a bunch of science classes and know …
... />
For example, on PT 71 Section 3 #4, E is the right ... -
PT 23 Section 3 Question 12Sooooo inferences are usually much more clear and this one is giving me a lot of trouble. I gave B a considerable amount of thought, but I felt like …
Sooooo inferences are usually much more clear and this one is giving me a lot of trouble. I gave B a considerable amount of thought, but I felt like it's a flaw because it goes from health food enthusiasts to saying in general, those who take XYZ will ... -
PT 73 Section 3 Game 2Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z? For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X c…
Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z?
For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X can go before Z as long as Y goes after Z. I am having trouble with my fundamentals, please help, ... -
Mapping Logical Reasoning: Do we have a set of questions available?Hi Everyone! I've been doing a lot of work recently with memorizing valid inferences that can be made from conditional and inter-sectional statem…
... set of questions similar to PT 43, Section 3, Question 9, beginning "Most ... -
PT60.S3.Q17 - any food that is not sterilized and sealed can contain bacteriahttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-17/ Any food that is not sterilized and sealed can contain bacteria JY’s translati…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-17/
Any food ... -
How to diagram "is"/"usually"How do you diagram "is"/"usually" statements? For example, PT 54 Section 4 Q 22. "The morally preferable act is usually the one that serves the lo…
... "/"usually" statements? For example, PT 54 Section 4 Q 22.
"The ... -
PT34.S3.Q17 - zoologist: animals can certainly signalCan someone elaborate on Why E is incorrect? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-3-question-17/
Can someone elaborate on Why E is incorrect?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-3-question-17/ -
Abstract language.I have an issue with the harder flaw reasoning questions. 99 times out of 100 i can point out the flaw. Hell i can make a stand up comedy routine abo…
... abstract language down. (random example. PT 41 section 3 question 20)
PT's. sort of just wanted ... -
LR question help?Hey guys! I was wondering if anyone could help clarify this tough Weaken question for me. Here's the link to the question: https://7sage.com/lsat…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-3-question-17/
I though ... -
Confusion about : "The {person}'s argument proceeds by...."I am a little confused about questions in which a scientist/critic/psychologist/whatever will state their opinion on something, often giving context …
... this is Question 20 from PT 68 section 3. I missed this question ... -
Confusing grammar in this sentenceFrom prep test 1, section 3, question 20, in the middle it states "However, most people consistently perceive small business as a force for good in s…
From prep test 1, section 3, question 20, in the middle ... -
PT72.S3.Q17 - Meade: People who are injured as a result ofHello, Here is my analysis for question 17 in section 3 for prep test 72. This is a weaken question; therefore, I wanted to weaken the connection…
... is my analysis for question 17 in section 3 for prep test 72 ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-3-question-17/ -
PT52.S3.Q17 - Philosopher: Graham argues that since a personIn this question why do we "attack" the premise. I thought we don't really try to attack the premise but in this question it does. How often does thi…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-3-question-17/ -
Distorting Argument - Flaw Answer ChoiceCan someone provide me with an example of what "distorts an argument against X, and then attacks this distorted argument" would look like? PT C2, …
Can someone provide me with an example of what "distorts an argument against X, and then attacks this distorted argument" would look like?
PT C2, Section #3, Question #6 Answer Choice D -
PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 18I'm having a hard time understanding the correct answer choice here as it seems to directly contradict the passage, which states that the amount of d…
I'm having a hard time understanding the correct answer choice here as it seems to directly contradict the passage, which states that the amount of domestic oil reserves considered extractable has not changed in ten years. The correct answer E would indeed ... -
PrepTest 1 Section 3 Question 11#help Can someone explain why B is the correct answer choice? ("The concentration of oxygen-18 in seawater is increased")
#help
Can someone explain why B is the correct answer choice? ("The concentration of oxygen-18 in seawater is increased") -
Some/Most (Relative) relationshipsHi everyone, I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships. Good example of this would be P…
Hi everyone,
I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships.
Good example of this would be PT 33, Sec 3, Q 8. -
Trouble with Science RC passages?Check out JY’s explanation breaking down the passage for PT 42, Section 3, Passage 4. He shows how crucial it is to be able to visualize. It is a gre…
Check out JY’s explanation breaking down the passage for PT 42, Section 3, Passage 4. He shows how crucial it is to be able to visualize. It is a great passage to hit hard for review! -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
If any one is curious the question that I'm looking at with regards to the above is PT 49, Section 2 Question 17 -
Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... why A is incorrect. For PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser" my ... -
"A few" versus "Few"Hi all, So I know "a few" is logically equivalent to "some" (more than 1), but for "few," can we say that it is logically equivalent to the opposi…
... is highly problematic. Check out PT 1 Section 4 Question 21 Answers D ... -
LG HelpI understand the 7sage method of improving on games (referring to the flowchart that is mentioned in the core curriculum) but I find that over the la…
... that it has taken me 1 calendar year: about 1200 games ... from scratch. Start with PT 2 Game 1. Do it three times ... it cannot go in spot 1. These are the reoccurring inference ... .
Then do PT 1 Game 3. Focus on what each question ... -
PT12.S4.Q22 - a long-term health studyHey All, So we have this health study that found that people who gained approximately 1 pound per year after the age of 35 tended, on the whole, t…
... of this, please refer to PT C2 Section 3 Question 15 (Deer). I ... -
PT40.S3.Q14 - the only clue I haveGot this one right by POE but had a tough time being OK with A. It is definitely something I considered as a flaw in the reasoning. However, the use …
... />
I’ve run into 3 questions before where I can ... these:
-PT C2 Section 3 Question 15
-PT 78 Section 3 Question 7
The indicator "even if"Hi, I know that there are many words that indicate what groups (universal quantifiers) you are in. Among them, where does the word "even if" belong t…
... function.
For PT 46 Section 3 Question 24, are you referring ..."All that is required" Sufficiency or Necessity indicator?I understand that "ALL" is a sufficiency indicator word, and "REQUIRE" is a necessity indicator word. I'm wondering then, what does the phrase "*…
... : EJ-->ROW)
[ PT 15, Section 3, Question 7].
Knowing ...
