Im so confused by a rule in this game which looks like an inclusive "OR BOTH" rules but in the video J.Y diagrams it as a "NOT BOTH"... can anyone help me understand why?
I don't understand how executives from other companies setting salaries higher could have an impact on the salaries of executives from other companies?
I chose correctly during the actual PT but picked wrong during BR. I'm having trouble finding the conclusion in the passage to find the correct inference. I picked AC: A because I thought the other choices were irrelevant.
... />
Easier question:
**Ex. PT 77 S4 Q6**
"Your ... . Clearly this is false advertising. [15% of the school runs track ... me up at first was PT 59 S215**
"A few theorists ...