Flaw Question-- calling all folks who are a beast at LR:) HELP?
I understand that the answer is C but I want to make sure that I'm breaking down the argument correctly:
*Best way to understand --> Direct Empathy (that's what some ...
Can anyone help me understand why answer choice C is incorrect? I have tried to understand JY's reason but I am just not getting it. Thanks. BTW the correct answer choice was A.
**Admin note: edited title and added link**
https:// ...
This question has one of the most insane assumptions I’ve ever seen on the LSAT, I’m sorry but this should of been taken off the exam. The assumption that a twin watching another twin would fall more (or completely) ...
I am having such a hard time understanding why answer choice (E) is wrong. Doesn't "few" translate to "some," rendering this answer choice valid? Somebody please help.
I am confused about the word “generally” in the conclusion.
**To Recap The argument form in Lawgic:**
**P1**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed)
**Required Premise**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed)-> Generally /(Able to choose ...
Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but the correct AC of this question seems to suggest the otherwise. Is this a bad LR question?
Congenial guests and plentiful supply (food and drinks) will ensure a successful dinner party. Sylvia has prepared more than enough to eat and drink and her guests are congenial therefore her party is certain to be a success.
I don't understand how executives from other companies setting salaries higher could have an impact on the salaries of executives from other companies?