HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 19 | 1.2K | 1.4K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.4K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 4 | 14.4K | 19.8K |
-
Question on LSAT question" Most people who shop for groceries no more than 3 times a month buy prepared frozen dinners regularly. In Hallstown, most people shop for groceries…
... question with the following framework: PT number/Section number/question number. For this particular question ... it would be: PT 32 Section1 Question ... -
PT 81 BR Sessions with J.Y.Hey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 81 (June 2017 LSAT). I'm holding 12 sessions total. 4 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session will …
For those of you on the call today, here's another good example of an age effect vs cohort effect flaw question:
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-09/ -
PT 81 BR Sessions with J.Y.Hey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 81 (June 2017 LSAT). I'm holding 12 sessions total. 4 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session will …
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-09/
>
> ... -
What's the deal with LG from PT 18In JYs video explanations, he says that the last 2 aren't applicable to the modern lsat. Given what the exam has been up to in recent years on logic …
In the comment section of the PT12.S2.Game 4 explanation page, J ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-12-section-2-game-4/#comment-19044 -
Mistaking sufficiency for necessity vs mistaking necessity for sufficiencyI'm a bit confused about the technical differences between the errors of (1) mistaking sufficiency or necessity and (2) mistaking necessity for suffi…
... has been one parallel flaw question I can think of ... the same mistake. That question is: Pt 51 Section 1 Question 20. That is ... the only question I can ... the descriptor for the flaw question after we spotted the mistake ... -
'Best of J.Y. moments:' J.Y.'s video explanations that just make your day.I just came across [this explanation](https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-4-question-18/) and I realized how much J.Y.'s humor has ha…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-2-question-05/
"Is your body a swamp?" -
PT31.S2.Q18 - not all works of artHi Can anyone tell me why this question " the reasoning above is questionable because it fails to exclude the possibility that." is not "fails to…
JY's explanation about the question:
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-18/ -
PT43.S2.Q20 - social critic: one of the most important wayshttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-43-section-2-question-20/ I find this to be the most interesting LR question I've come across, because I'…
... commented in the comment section of PT43.2.20, so I'd ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-43-section-2-question-20/#comment-72130
You wrote in the comment section that (B) is saying “**_fail ... -
'Even without''even without' does not seem to follow our group 3 indicator rules.... Ella can pass even without giving her presentation Using Group 3 rules I…
... stuck on this while doing PT 37 section 2 qs 3.....such an ... -
PT62.S2.Q25 - university president: our pool of applicantsHey guys, I am having trouble understanding what is wrong with C. Even though I initially picked the right answer which is A I can't seem up eliminat…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-62-section-2-question-25/
The argument ... -
Non-linear spacial gamesHi @J.Y. Ping , I have come across a non-linear spacial game type . I need your suggestion on how to go about it. Since it is a different type of gam…
... "circular game" (**PT41. S2. Game 4**) like the one you wrote ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-2-game-4/
This type ... -
Causation/correlation and phenomenonHello, everyone. I’ve been drilling strengthening questions and I’m having an issue with causation/correlation and phenomenon type arguments. The lin…
... being able to label the question as one or the other ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-2-question-14/
Here Kim ... -
PT45.S4.Q16 - People are not happy unlessHey all I've had some trouble with this LR question. When I did this problem, I think I mistakenly diagrammed one of the premises as: Feeling …
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-18/) can also be an ... -
Public Opinion = majority?Hi! In LR, when something is said to be of public opinion of a given society, does that imply that more than half of the people in that region belie…
... /> I was looking at PT43, Section 2, Question 21 about the curator and ... -
Public Opinion = majority?Hi! In LR, when something is said to be of public opinion of a given society, does that imply that more than half of the people in that region belie…
... ; I was looking at PT43, Section 2, Question 21 about the curator and ... -
Mostly Strongly SupportedI am still in the process of going through these lessons so I might be ahead of myself but is there a formula for tackling most strongly support ques…
... them. You can revisit the question(s) after you learn more ... point us to a specific question or two that you particularly ... or telling us the PT number,section, and question number. Perhaps we will ... -
PT23.S2.Q14 - Kim: In northern Europe during the eighteenthCan someone please help me understand what the stimulus is saying. https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-2-question-14/ **Admin n…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-2-question-14/
>
> ... -
Rare argument form: the "Tether" assumptionHey everyone, Across my studies, one thing that I have tried to do with LR is to look at arguments as repetitions of older forms of arguments. Tryi…
... and it seems like PT21 Section 2 Question 5 might fall withing this ... -
Comparative PassageDoes anyone happen to have a list of all the comparative passages? (Ex, PT 57, Passage 3). I want to drill them and was hoping someone had a list. Si…
... Section 1 Passage 2
PrepTest 55 Section 2 Passage 2
PrepTest 56 Section 4 ... Section 2 Passage 4
PrepTest 59 Section 4 Passage 1
PrepTest 60 Section 4 Passage 2 ... 70 Section 2 Passage 3
PrepTest 71 Section 4 Passage 2
PT31.S3.Q14 - Ethicist: Both ASA and TPA are clot-dissolvingHey 7Sagers, We're posting on behalf of a 7Sager. They would like to get advice from you! ************** LSAT PT 31 JUNE 2000 sectio…
... the structure.
In PT31 Section 2 Question 04, the sentence with "what ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-04/
https://7sage.com ...PT49.S2.Q15 - The greater the number of people who regularly use a productThe greater the number of people who regularly use a product, the greater the number whose health is potentially at risk due to that product. More pe…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-2-question-15/
Answer choice ... important to be tested.
2. It is not important to ... you read it. A good question to ask here would be ...Malcom Gladwell takes the LSATBelow is a link to Gladwell's podcast (part 1) where he talks about his experience taking the LSAT. There's still another part to come but the pod en…
... SpaceX.
2. I also don't get ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-40-section-3-question-12/)
). ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-2-question-08/)) As @"Jonathan Wang ... every single parallel reasoning question). Regular chess is also ...NA vs. SA question stemI just went thru PT7 S4 Q13 and came across a question stem that’s says *“In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the fo…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-20/NA vs. SA question stemI just went thru PT7 S4 Q13 and came across a question stem that’s says *“In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the fo…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-20/
I think ...NA vs. SA question stemI just went thru PT7 S4 Q13 and came across a question stem that’s says *“In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the fo…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-20/
>
> ...Can a 7sage employee or tutor answer this question?I posted this before but no one commented so I was wondering if there was a way to see explanation videos for substituted conditions in logic games? …
... com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-3-game-2/)
* [ ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-62-section-3-game-1/)
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-64-section-2-game-2/)
* [PT65 ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-65-section-2-game-4/)
...Confusing S for N versus N for SPremise: Resign--->Convicted Conclusion: Convicted--->Resign Would this be confusing N for S or S for N? I thought the two were interchangeable but…
The answer choice says confusing S for N though. That is why I am confused. PT 22, Section 2, #25Mistaken Reversal versus Mistaken NegationAren't the two logical equivalents? Mistaken Reversal is "confusing Necessary for Sufficient" while it's the other way around for Mistaken Negation. …
The question I am referring to is from PT22.S2.Q25.
**Admin Note:** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-2-question-25/
