... ’re missing a lot of LR weaken questions or running out ... on LG, 6-9 on 2LR and 3-9 on RC ... can go around 2 check with it but with LR, always short ... is 171-178. LG 0, LR 3/6, RC 0/4.
The games threw me for a terrible loop. Shouldn’t have been that hard but very unfamiliar. I felt like I was crushing the first 2lr’s. I’m hoping because lg is quite possibly 50% and so was rc.
Since BR for November 1 and November 3 are both on section 2LR questions 1-14, does it mean that section 2LR will be taught/discussed twice? If so then yayyyy because I am planning on taking PT88 this weekend! Thank you @ JY!!!
> @denis045 said:
> I think this was the experimental LR: a question about cyclists on slick roads? Ring a bell for any 2 section LR peeps? Praying this was not on the real test
... think this was the experimental LR: a question about cyclists on ... ? Ring a bell for any 2 section LR peeps? Praying this was ... />
>
> I had 2LR & I don't think ... .
... , I’d say just drill LR question types untimed. Heck, even ... do LR sections from the earlier tests ... of your target scores (-1/-2LR average for a 175), then ...
... /4 games almost perfect, and LR is consistently pretty strong. If ... standard 5 section LSAT with 2LR sections to save my behind ... flex if they made the LR section worth more than the ...
... 're noticing on your LR sections I think others ...
Thanks. I just finished 2LR (89-LR2 and 7-LR2 ... but I've been doing LR drills for a while, ... rather than my 2nd LR is almost always better ... than my 1st LR section...