HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.7K |
| 22 | 986 | 1.2K |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
| q18 | 218 | 232 |
-
PT9.S4.Q18 - Logical Reasoning "For most ethical dilemmas..."Answer is C: I actually eliminated C pretty quickly on the grounds that the answer choice alleges the ethical principle **does not help** the journal…
Answer is C: I actually eliminated C pretty quickly on the grounds that the answer choice alleges the ethical principle **does not help** the journalist, whereas Anita states that the guidance is **inadequate**. If something is inadequate, I take that to ... -
Strange CoincidenceI found out today, by accident, that PT 26 S1 Game 2 and PT 81 S4 Game 2 are the exact same game. They have different settings (sending letters vs da…
... accident, that PT 26 S1 Game 2 and PT 81 S4 Game 2 ... because I had randomly done PT 26 S1 game 2 as ... a warmup LG before taking PT 81 today. They did ask ... -
Necessary Assumption Guaranteed Wrong AnswerThe video accompanying PT 73 S4 Q26 ruled out answer choice B because it included the conditional, "if." Will any necessary assumption answer cho…
The video accompanying PT 73 S4 Q26 ruled out answer choice ... -
PTB.S4.Q18 - In a study in which secondary school students...can you explain why this weaken question is incorrect? I chose answer C, but the correct answer is answer E
can you explain why this weaken question is incorrect? I chose answer C, but the correct answer is answer E -
PT1.S4.Q18 - Several cosmetics firms...Need help in explaining why (A) and (D) is wrong. I understand that we need to strengthen the argument that the firm's need to reduce the tests on l…
Need help in explaining why (A) and (D) is wrong.
I understand that we need to strengthen the argument that the firm's need to reduce the tests on live animals and therefore use new tests: cultures of human cells.
However, (A) seems ... -
When to implement Sufficient/Necessary conditions into logic game rules.Hello everyone, I've been tackling LG for some time now, and it seems that practice is paying off. However, in/out LG games still seem to tank my …
... -93-section-4-game-3/ (PT 93 S4 G3)
https ... )
For example, in PT 93, JY explains that the ... other in/out games. In PT 61, I tried applying the ... a conditional relationship similar to PT 93 is only when there ... -
PT 93 S4 GamesCould any 7sage administrator or someone tell e where the difficulty would be onthese four games? Especially games 3 and 4 please?
Could any 7sage administrator or someone tell e where the difficulty would be onthese four games? Especially games 3 and 4 please? -
Identifying flawsI'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw? Is PT 52 S3 Q4 …
I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT 54 S4 Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks -
or and both Conditional Chain rulesConfused as to why we did not chain the second rule, O---> P/ (PT36 S4 G1). Previously in PT 33 S4 game 2 there was a similar condition and we did pu…
... ---> P/ (PT36 S4 G1). Previously in PT 33 S4 game 2 there ... " conditional statements. Additionally we had PT 23 S1 G2 where we ... -
The Hardest LR Question of All Time - Preptest 29 Number 17 LR Studies of the reliability of eyewitnOk, I am joking about this being the hardest LR question of all time. Of course, there have been harder questions, but for some reason, this one took…
... function as sufficient assumptions (PT 54 S2 Q18 is a good example ... pretty much the same as PT 47 S1 Q20)
Toughest PrepTests?Hey everyone, First time poster but I have been a lurker for a few weeks. I'm sorry if this has already been asked, but does anyone have a list of s…
... less consistent. For example, PT 1 is utterly different in ... , the LG, than is PT 66 (which I took yesterday ... the "Juggler" game, in PT 22, or one of the other ... three tests:
PT 41: 4 wrong, 178
PT 48 was scaled so that ...PT22.S2.Q07 - newsletter for community-center volunteerscan someone please go through this with me? http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-2-question-07/
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
Pt 15 - S4 - Game 2 (Country of ... lawgic
Pt 6 - S4 - Game 4 (Network of Bridges ... lines
Pt 6- S4- Game 3 (eight benches)
Pt 4 - S3 - Game 4 (Ski ... brute force.
Pt 16- S1- Game 4 (Tennis ...PT 46 S4 Game 3 Question# 12<i>Hey 7Sagers, had someone email me with a question and I thought you guys could help out! Here it is:</i> I have a question or comment regar…
@"Dillon A. Wright" said:
Hey 7Sagers
I thought for a second Dillon had finally started studying for the LSAT for real!
I believe you still owe us some real-time logic games ... ;)PT 69-S1- Q18 - In order to encourage personalHi all, could someone help me see why B is not supported? The way I see it, the scientist shouldn't be allowed to profit from his technology... But i…
We want an answer that contradicts the stimulus, not one that is irrelevant. The stimulus essentially states that if you’re restricting, then you preventing negative effects. TO contradict that,we negate it: Restricting AND not preventing negative effects. ...What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... some in the LSAT context. PT 62 S4 (towards the end, the ...What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... case of the question mentioned (PT 62, S4, Q23), the incorrect answer ...PT19.S4.Q18 - politician: a government that taxeshttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-18/ I'm posing this question primarily because of answer choice A on PT19 S4 Q18. Ans…
... general format, for example, "PT19.S4.Q18 - Politician: A government that taxes ...Super Sayian LSAT !! FrankenLsatI'm currently creating the hardest LSAT ever, I have searched for the hardest game questions, and the hardest Reading Comp questions, now I need help…
... /> PT37 S2 Q22
PT37 S4 Q17
PT40 S1 Q23 ... S1 Q12
PT45 S4 Q18
PT45 S4 Q20
PT46 S2 ... /> PT46 S3 Q24
PT50 S4 Q12
PT62 S2 Q25 ... /> PT76 S2 Q20
PT76 S4 Q21
PT76 ...PT34.S4.G4 - each of exactly six doctorsHi All, I've been pretty good with setting up and reading conditional chains for in-and-out games but for some reason I'm really confused with th…
@CrushLSAT said:
question 19 (which asks for a complete and accurate list of doctors at Souderton) be E (N and P)? Why can't the ~N --> J pair be treated the same as ~O --> J? If we only have N and P, aren't we still good since we have at ...Chart skeptic's challenge: show me a game for which a chart definitely saves timeI've just gone through the "Grouping Games with a Chart" lessons, and for each of the four games -- two in the lessons and two in the problem set -- …
Just ran into another example: PT 47 S4 G3 -- record stores and music ...PT72.S4.G1 - a radio station airs hourly news updatesA condition stated is "Within each segment, reports are ordered by length, from longest to shortest." For purposes of my question I'd like to emphasi…
@"steve-10" said:
The correct answer to Q1, the typical "acceptable configuration" question, implies T — W (where "—" is the usual notation indicating relative order).
Well, it does imply that T -- W is a possibility. T -- W ...Descriptive premises with normative conclusions in sufficient assumption questionsIs it always the case that if an argument for a sufficient assumption question has descriptive premises with a normative conclusion (saying one shoul…
... example, on the question from PT 22, the argument just isn’t ... choice for the question from PT 22, it doesn’t give us ... argument valid. The question from PT 22 can’t be made valid ...Intermediate conclusionsI'm having trouble differentiating the IC from the premises and I don't like IC questions in general...if something leads to a conclusion then it mak…
... intermediate conclusion. An example is PT 30 S4 Q13. The subsidiary(intermediate ...Using words like "should"Is the use of a word like "should" prescriptive on the LSAT.? What i mean is: if a stimulus says that something will happen or could happen, will tha…
@goingfor99th PT 33 S3 Q18 AC, E. It could be wrong for other reasons. But in the LSAT TRAINER he says that saying what we ought to do is a different conclusionFlawed Reasoning Questions: ambiguous or misinterpretation of key termI see this answer choice often (The argument ambiguously uses x, or argument relies on interpreting a key term differently), and JY always says this …
... /> Easier question:
**Ex. PT 77 S4 Q6**
"Your newspapers advertisement ... me up at first was PT 59 S2 15**
"A ...
