HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 21.7K | 36.1K |
| 29 | 597 | 689 |
| section | 23K | 37.8K |
| 4 | 14.3K | 19.5K |
-
PT 50 Section 4 Q22Help [Mod edit] For reference: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-22/
Help
[Mod edit]
For reference: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-22/ -
Causation Question StrategyWould somebody mind looking at the strategy below and letting me know if it makes sense/I've included everything? Thanks! On weakening questi…
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation. -
PT 69 BR call - UPDATE Section 4 LR Meeting Wednesday, March 24th, at 6pm EST. [Link Posted]All scoring levels welcome. Flex test version. Requirements: - Have taken the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the 2nd LR se…
... the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the ... 2nd LR section will not be ... know!**
**DONE** PT 69 FLEX 3/22/21 ... />
**UPDATE: PT69 section 4 LR (second LR section) BR call - Wednesday, March ... -
PT 29.S2.P1 - for some years before the outbreak of world war 1https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-2-passage-1-passage Hi everyone - I'm currently working on Reading Comprehension and am work…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-2-passage-1-passage
... 35, an art passage from PT 29 is dissected.
My ... -
June Test-Takers, Week of Dec. 14th: Wed (PT 29), Sat (Workshop-RC Question Types) Sat (PT 30)<img src="http://mittromneycentral.com/uploads/june-3.jpg"> </center> June Test Takers! We’ve got 6 months, so let’s make them count by getting o…
... Dec. 16th at 8PM ET: PT 29
Click here to join ...
Note: these tests (PTs 29-35) are part of the ... by taking an actual PT without having to use ... the curriculum to do this PT, BR it and then ... /> For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... -
[Spoiler Alert] LR Issues PT 69 - Section 4There were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers that I could not seem to justify even after BRing, not sure if this type …
... were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers ... -
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
Complete PT 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark ... -
June 2007 LSAT Section 4 Question 13Hi there, I am going through my BR of the June 2007 LSAT. I got question 13 of section 4 wrong, so I am trying to understand why B is wrong but E …
... . I got question 13 of section 4 wrong, so I am trying ... -
pt 16 game 4 .. I tried over and over still can't attempt the questions any help?Hey I'm trying to foolproof games 1-35 pacifico style. I stumbled upon pt. 16 game 4. This is the hardest game I've ever seen. I thought PT.12 (game …
... style. I stumbled upon pt. 16 game 4. This is the hardest ... ever seen. I thought PT.12 (game 4?) the flask game was ... me ur reactions to pt 16 game 4, whatever they may be ... -
Diagramming Pure Sequencing GamesPure sequencing is one of my weaker areas and I'm starting to wonder if it might be easier and save more time for me to translate each rule individua…
... /> PT 29 Game 4
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-3-game-4 ... to connect rules 3 and 4 in this game without diagramming ... me compared to having all 4 rules visually represented and then ... -
Pt 54 section 4 question 24"Downtown petropolis boasted over 100 large buildings 5 years ago". By poe I kind of am able to get to the answer E , bUT I don't understand why th…
"Downtown petropolis boasted over 100 large buildings 5 years ago".
By poe I kind of am able to get to the answer E , bUT I don't understand why that is the answer.
Why "significantly fewer than 60"?? Is 100 the staple number of buildings ... -
pt 58 section 4 #17Premise ~Nobility -----> ~ Tragedy (~ = negative) Conclusion ~Fate -------> ~ Tragedy It is obvious we must link the concept of Nobili…
Premise
~Nobility -----> ~ Tragedy
(~ = negative)
Conclusion
~Fate -------> ~ Tragedy
It is obvious we must link the concept of Nobility and Fate. Making D right.
My ... -
pt 65 section 4 # 14Main Point question, I agonize between B and E. B is wrong because they never said it was not the only factor? But isn't E wrong as well because t…
Main Point question, I agonize between B and E. B is wrong because they never said it was not the only factor? But isn't E wrong as well because the conclusion was about unlikely that a prediction will occur where as E said probably will not? Isn't E ... -
PT 29/ Section 1/ Question 8Can anyone explain the incorrect answer choice "B" because I'm having trouble getting through the convoluted way it's written?
Can anyone explain the incorrect answer choice "B" because I'm having trouble getting through the convoluted way it's written? -
PT 26 Section 4 Bus GameHello, I am having a trouble understanding this rule: H occupies the aisle seat immediately behind G's aisle seat. Why are we putting G in the ais…
Hello, I am having a trouble understanding this rule:
H occupies the aisle seat immediately behind G's aisle seat. Why are we putting G in the aisle seat? What about this:
3 _ H
2 G _
1 _ _
Isn't ... -
"Only" Question<b></b>I'm having trouble translating "only" statements... can anyone help me out? For example: <b>Only</b> the best artworks are beautiful. (P…
... the best artworks are beautiful. (PT 49, Section 4, Question 16)
PT29.S4.Q22 - critic: most chorale preludesIm having problems eliminating answer A for this question. Can anyone explain why it is wrong? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-…
Im having problems eliminating answer A for this question. Can anyone explain why it is wrong?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-4-question-22PT29.S4.Q12 - editorialist: drivers with a largeCan anyone show me their diagram of this question? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-4-question-12/
Can anyone show me their diagram of this question?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-4-question-12/Flaw questions: Sufficiency necessity confusionI got a question for high scorers; when you see an argument like PT 22 - Section 4 - Question 21 that have sufficiency necessity confusion but you de…
... you see an argument like PT 22 - Section 4 - Question 21 that have ...How to diagram "is"/"usually"How do you diagram "is"/"usually" statements? For example, PT 54 Section 4 Q 22. "The morally preferable act is usually the one that serves the lo…
... "is"/"usually" statements? For example, PT 54 Section 4 Q 22.
Do you get nervous when you put 3 of the same letter in a row?I have always been the type of person to change answers based on a repeating pattern because "there's <b>no way</b> they would put 4 C's in a row, ri…
... no way they would put 4 C's in a row ... practice exams that I wrote (PT 19, Section 4 LR)
15 ...PT29.S4.Q14 - plant manager: we could greatly reduce After watching video, I understand why A is true. Yet, I still confuse about (D). Is it not a flaw? The link is here https://7sage.com/lsat_expla…
After watching video, I understand why A is true. Yet, I still confuse about (D). Is it not a flaw?
The link is here https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-4-question-14/Preptests misspelling or missing words?As I am going through the CC I have noticed in at least two PTs that there have been a misspelled or missing word in a question. The first time I…
... more game changing. In my PT 22, Section 4, Question 14, answer choice ... experienced a difference between their PT's language and what 7sage ... ? I'm not worried my PT's are severely messed up ...Descriptive premises with normative conclusions in sufficient assumption questionsIs it always the case that if an argument for a sufficient assumption question has descriptive premises with a normative conclusion (saying one shoul…
... />
Looking at PT 22, Section 4, Q13 and PT 62, Section 2, Q17, I ...PT29.S4.Q17 - studies of the reliability of eyewitnessHello! I didn't see any prior discussions on this question, and it's confusing me a bit so I wanted to get some outside opinions! https://7sage.com/…
... /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-4-question-17/
We ...PTA.S4.Q10 - the therapist's reply to the interviewerWhat does answer choice A mean to you? Coming out of Feb 1996 PT 14 Section 4 Question 10. Question stem: The therapist's reply to the interviewe…
difference between Suff. Assumptions vs. Nec. Assumptions that act as a "bridge."Hi everyone, I'm confused about the difference between Sufficient Assumptions vs. Necessary Assumptions that act as a "bridge." I understand th…
... />
As an example, PT 44, Section 4, question 7 is relevant. https ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-4-question-07/
Thank ...Some vs SomeHow does one distinguish between some-referring to a single person option like, (some people say the LSAT is hard) vs when a author of passage use "s…
... is in context to ** LSAT 29 - Section 4 - Question 06**PT29.S4.Q21 - WeaklingsHow is "few cowards fail to be fools" diagrammed? Is it "most cowards are fools?" w---s----c----m----f w---s----f Is this correct? **Admin N…
... :** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-4-question-21/PT13.S4.Q7 - Murray and JaneIn PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You are wrong to make this claim", does he mean that the claim being made is wrong? It is one thin…
In PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says " ... titled. Please use the format "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of ...
