HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 32 | 304 | 332 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
-
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... - 25 Q
Section 3 - 25 Q
Section 4 - 26 Q
Section 1 and 4 were the real sections, right? Section 3 seemed ... -
Proctor Nightmare :(So I already saw a string a few test center complaints from this morning's test but what I experienced today wasn't at all from other students' disru…
I think I was in the same room. Newark? It was SO terrible. The ending early really threw me off my game for Section 3.
I'm also super interested in how LSAC handles this. -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... that. All I remember from Section 3 is that question about clergy ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... had 2 RC sections. The section with the Louvre was experimental ... people had an experimental LR section (3 LR sections) broken down as ... /> Btw-- RC as the 5th section after 2 LR sections is ... -
At the end of my rope. Need advice.So...today I took the September LSAT and had to cancel my score, which is devastating because I have now prepped with various methods for 1.5 years. …
Totally went through the same thing and didn't calm down until section 3. it really sucks -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had 3 LR sections, and I'm pretty sure section 3 (2nd LR ... section) was my experimental. To ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... really interesting way.
Section 1: RC. I totally bombed ... can remember.
Section 3: LG. Killed it
Section 4: RC. Killed ... hard. By the end of section 2, the test really felt ... LR. LR is my strongest section, and that's really what ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... br /> >
> Section 1: RC. I totally bombed ... I can remember.
> Section 3: LG. Killed it
... . Killed it
> Section 5: LR. Killed it
section 2, the test really ... . LR is my strongest section, and that's really ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> >
> Section 1: RC. I totally bombed ... can remember.
> Section 3: LG. Killed it
... Killed it
> Section 5: LR. Killed it< ... RC. My first section was the experimental RC ... this was the experimental section and gave the other ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... >
> Section 1: RC. I totally bombed ... can remember.
> Section 3: LG. Killed it
... Killed it
> Section 5: LR. Killed it< ... LR is my strongest section, and that's really ... difficulty of a particular section that someone like @" ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... I'm pretty sure section 3 (2nd LR section) was my experimental. To ... /> > Did your first LR section have a question about school ... remember if your 3rd LR section (Section 4) have a lot of ...
I had all 3 LR -
With 2 real LSATs under my belt, and one still fresh, AMA if you are curious about real test vs. PTsHey all, I wanted to do this as a favor for people who have yet to take a real LSAT. Saturday was my 2nd real LSAT. I sat for the September 2016 and …
... for me is the experimental section will play mind games with ... usually practice with a fifth section but if you know which ... the experimental. When I started section 3 I was SUPER convinced that ... the experimental and a hard section can have you praying it ... -
Best way to get back to studying?'Ello all, What are your best tips to get back into studying after the exam? Do you continue with some PTs and BR as usual? I've watched the we…
... a blank copy of the section and different colored pens ... I frequently go through the section 3 or 4 times for ... my work on the blank section using a different colored ... good look at the section as a whole and ... the specific lessons of the section. I make notes in ... -
Conditional Reasoning; Relation to Premises and Conclusions?Hello Folks, I posted this in the powerscore forum as well, but it looks a little dead over there. I was hoping I might be able to pick someone's …
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-3-question-22/
[chlorarachniophytes]
RC Study Group: PT 78 (Oct 8, 7 pm EDT)Hey everyone, I was wondering if there is any interest out there to also blind review the hardest RC passage together each time we do a PT . Maybe …
... we have spoken about your PT schedule before. :)
>
PT schedule better than I do ... true. I do know your PT schedule better ;)Guess it's my turn to ask...Feel gutted by the test. It was such a weird mix. I went perfect on LG -0 I did horrible on LR -8/-5 I did horrible on RC -7 My lowest PT in …
... ;
> My lowest PT in the 3 months prior to the ...Guess it's my turn to ask...Feel gutted by the test. It was such a weird mix. I went perfect on LG -0 I did horrible on LR -8/-5 I did horrible on RC -7 My lowest PT in …
... /> > > My lowest PT in the 3 months prior to the ...Guess it's my turn to ask...Feel gutted by the test. It was such a weird mix. I went perfect on LG -0 I did horrible on LR -8/-5 I did horrible on RC -7 My lowest PT in …
... ; > > My lowest PT in the 3 months prior to the ...Guess it's my turn to ask...Feel gutted by the test. It was such a weird mix. I went perfect on LG -0 I did horrible on LR -8/-5 I did horrible on RC -7 My lowest PT in …
... ; > > My lowest PT in the 3 months prior to the ...Guess it's my turn to ask...Feel gutted by the test. It was such a weird mix. I went perfect on LG -0 I did horrible on LR -8/-5 I did horrible on RC -7 My lowest PT in …
... ; > > My lowest PT in the 3 months prior to the ...Guess it's my turn to ask...Feel gutted by the test. It was such a weird mix. I went perfect on LG -0 I did horrible on LR -8/-5 I did horrible on RC -7 My lowest PT in …
... ;
> My lowest PT in the 3 months prior to the ...Am I allowed to review CoreC during BR?As title. Am I allowed to use the Core Curriculum as I'm going through my BR?
... you have BR'd your PT/timed section, THEN you can and ...Huge discrepancy between both LR sectionsOver my last couple of ptests I have scored in my goal range for one (ex -4) and then like 5 below that (-10). It's really hurting my score. I was wo…
... 3/5 that has been the case. For instance today, section 1 ... I got -4 and section 3 I got -10 ...How to get better at predictingThis is for assumption family questions (flaw, na, sa, psa) I see the conclusion. I see the support. But even for the easiest questions (as in one…
... />
For example, in PT 82 Section 1 #7 (even though it ...New NA and SA difficultiesThe new NA and SA questions in PT 70 onward are killing me. I thought I had a strong grasp of them since I did well on almost all of them from PTs 52…
... yes! The questions were: PT 70, section 1, Q21. Section 4, Q. 20 ...New NA and SA difficultiesThe new NA and SA questions in PT 70 onward are killing me. I thought I had a strong grasp of them since I did well on almost all of them from PTs 52…
... yes! The questions were: PT 70, section 1, Q21. Section 4, Q. 20 ...PT40.S3.Q26 - north american ph.d. programsHi. Could anyone tell me why (c) weakens the arg? Isn't it irrelevant that it talks about errors of the data? Thank you in advance!! Happy studying e…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-40-section-3-question-26/
Here is 7sage's explanation...PT82.S4.Q13 - Computer voice recognition technologyHey all, I don't know if this is allowed, so moderators please step in if it isn't--I just wanted to see if anyone could provide an explanation (espe…
... -section-4-question-13/
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-3 ...PT60.S3.Q22 - consumer advocate: there is no doubtSo I 100% understand why A is the correct answer. I don't need an explanation on that. I need an explanation on how answer choice C, when negat…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-22/
P ...PT57.S3.Q6 - Economist: As should be obviousHi everyone. Has anyone worked this question? If so, could you explain to me why D is incorrect? It's supposed to be an easy question being in the ea…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-06/
The ... title says it's "#3," so could you maybe edit ...
