lol @nicole.hopkins for the win : I actually didn't coz these games (most of them at least) have been mentioned in the various lists in the thread... but here they are: PT 34 Game 4, PT 36 game 3, PT38 Game 4, PT 40 Game 3, PT 57 Game 3
... to be using up fresh PT's when you're not ... my mistake. I wasted 15+ PT's when I was only ... go up to PT38. My suggestion is use PT 39-51or at ...
The older test are great for drilling and familiarizing yourself with the question types. You want to save PT38+ for when you're finished with the course.
So far, I've got two people definitely on board for the weekend after next. Let's just say PT38 it is -since Gladiator was kind enough to make a suggestion. Unless I hear otherwise, we will make that our first session.
... reading, my game was 38% in PT 36 which slowly improved to ... 43% in PT 37, 54% in PT38 ... , 52% in PT 39, and ... 78% in PT40. But for PT 41 ...
... this right now. Started from PT38 -> high 160's, to ... low 170's in PT 50's, then back to ... mid160's in PT 60's. Does this mean ... let the scores of a PT hurt your confidence. You know ...
@CrushLSAT said:
question 19 (which asks for a complete and accurate list of doctors at Souderton) be E (N and P)? Why can't the ~N --> J pair be treated the same as ~O --> J? If we only have N and P, aren't we still good since we have at ...
@"steve-10" said:
The correct answer to Q1, the typical "acceptable configuration" question, implies T — W (where "—" is the usual notation indicating relative order).
Well, it does imply that T -- W is a possibility. T -- W ...
... !
> I just finished PT38 and scored a 176, BR ... />
> P.S. Planning another PT tomorrow, so that will be ... />
If you just finished a PT, I wouldn't do another ... work on besides just another PT. Doing PTs back to back ...