HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 48 | 287 | 321 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
-
New NA and SA difficultiesThe new NA and SA questions in PT 70 onward are killing me. I thought I had a strong grasp of them since I did well on almost all of them from PTs 52…
... yes! The questions were: PT 70, section 1, Q21. Section 4, Q. 20 ... -
New NA and SA difficultiesThe new NA and SA questions in PT 70 onward are killing me. I thought I had a strong grasp of them since I did well on almost all of them from PTs 52…
... yes! The questions were: PT 70, section 1, Q21. Section 4, Q. 20 ... -
PT40.S3.Q26 - north american ph.d. programsHi. Could anyone tell me why (c) weakens the arg? Isn't it irrelevant that it talks about errors of the data? Thank you in advance!! Happy studying e…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-40-section-3-question-26/
Here is 7sage's explanation... -
PT82.S4.Q13 - Computer voice recognition technologyHey all, I don't know if this is allowed, so moderators please step in if it isn't--I just wanted to see if anyone could provide an explanation (espe…
... -section-4-question-13/
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-3 ... -
PT60.S3.Q22 - consumer advocate: there is no doubtSo I 100% understand why A is the correct answer. I don't need an explanation on that. I need an explanation on how answer choice C, when negat…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-22/
P ... -
PT57.S3.Q6 - Economist: As should be obviousHi everyone. Has anyone worked this question? If so, could you explain to me why D is incorrect? It's supposed to be an easy question being in the ea…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-06/
The ... title says it's "#3," so could you maybe edit ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... confirmation? Also in the same section was lake sassafras towards the ... 'm guessing the 2nd LR (section 3 of the entire test) was ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... 3 LR sections was experimental. The only question I remember the section ... end of my second LR section (section 3) with 26 questions. I think ... :
> Was the LR section with a question about Species ... experimental or real? (Second LR section for me.) -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... 3 LR sections was experimental. The only question I remember the section ... end of my second LR section (section 3) with 26 questions. I ... > > Was the LR section with a question about Species ... experimental or real? (Second LR section for me.)
> ... -
the diaper postthrowaway account for 'obvious' reasons lol we've had these semi-joke, semi-serious posts before, but... this is it. in all seriousness, I'm go…
... completely forgot till I realized section 3 was done and then I ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... was experimental. The 1st section without a doubt had the ... 3rd LR was my only section with 26 questions.
... number of questions for any section (how do y'all ... and 26. So most likely section #2 was experimental.
... the 2nd LR (which was section 3 haha). -
PT63.S3.Q24 - physician: the rise in blood pressureHi everyone! Can someone please help me with this question. I can't understand why C is wrong at all. I got it down to A and C and ended up picking …
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-24/
Kaplan/Barron's/test prep books without real LSAT questions for startingI've heard form multiple sources that reccommend that I only buy books that use real LSAT questions (unlike Kaplan, Barro's, etc) I have over a ye…
... , 11 incorrect, 1 blank
Section 3 (Arguments): 9 correct, 16 incorrect ...
Section 4 (Reading Comprehension): 15 correct ...Kaplan/Barron's/test prep books without real LSAT questions for startingI've heard form multiple sources that reccommend that I only buy books that use real LSAT questions (unlike Kaplan, Barro's, etc) I have over a ye…
... ; @10000019
>
> Section 1 (Games): 12 correct, 11 ... incorrect, 1 blank
> Section 3 (Arguments): 9 correct, 16 incorrect ...
> Section 4 (Reading Comprehension): 15 correct ...Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... S1LR25/S3LR25/S4LR26 Section 1 WAS real not Section 3 just like those ... should have known the one section I knew I destroyed was ...Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... S1LR25/S3LR25/S4LR26 Section 1 WAS real not Section 3 just like those ... should have known the one section I knew I destroyed was ...Personal Study Buddy RequestHello, I'm probably taking the LSAT again in June. I did a lot better than last time (13 point increase thanks to 7sage) but my score still sucks…
... having to do one PT a week
#3- Be honest about ...The In/Out games are killing meBrutally. Any advice? I'm just now learning them and just completed that part of the CC. They are just crushing my soul. Tonight I plan on review…
... System practice games:
PT 24 G4 (really useful inference ... /> PT 45 G3
PT 47 G2
PT 48 G1
PT 49 ... G3 ("waterfall" strategy works well here)
PT ... of conditional logic)
PT 54 G1 (tricky conditional logic ...PT4.S3.G1 - a law firm has exactly nine partnersI missed question 4. I actually couldn’t pick an answer because they all appeared to work as I moved my l–n block around for each answer choice. I re…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-4-section-3-game-1/PT14.S4.Q9 - anyone who supports the new tax planI'm really having trouble with this question. Am I supposed to approach it as a sufficient assumption question though it's a flaw question? Thanks in…
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section 4 question 20.Percentage Fallacy - Adding percentagesWhen is it valid to add percentages of two different sets. I know that sometimes the two sets could be overlapping and their percentages can't be add…
Consider looking at PT 48-1-24 when you get a chance. This argument is doing something similar to what you describe above (although not precisely the same.)Complaint/Critique: Inconsistent LG approachesThere are some situations where JY takes a different approach to a rule for no ostensible reason other than the fact that the ordinary approach would…
... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-3-game-2/), if you ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-3-game-2/), I tell ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-3-game-2/) (which free ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-73-section-3-game-1/), it's ...LR/RC Tracker/SpreadsheetDoes anyone has a tracker or spreadsheet that they use for LR and/or RC? I know that using a tracker/spreadsheet for LG is common but I was just wond…
Thanks guy these are beautiful and I love that you guys were able to bounce ideas off each other! @hawaiihi what is the PT'D? section for??LR/RC Tracker/SpreadsheetDoes anyone has a tracker or spreadsheet that they use for LR and/or RC? I know that using a tracker/spreadsheet for LG is common but I was just wond…
> @"Mia Fairweather" said:
> @hawaiihi what is the PT'D? section for??
It's just so I can note whether or not I took a section on its own or as part of a PT!February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
I had LG LR LG RC LR. The Powerscore link posted above by @KevinA14 is spot on. The second LG on my test (Section 3) was experimental.February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
LG with truck on east west north south, is it real? It was the Section 3. The second LG for me.
I had LG LR LG RC LR.
RC had DuBois and Washington, Copyright, Beetle, Justified lying (not in order).February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
> @"Grace..." said:
> LG with east west north south, is it real? It was the Section 3. The second LG for me.
I had only one LG and didn't have a game like that.Feb Test Logic GamesI normally crush the LG section and I found it really hard. I couldn't get past a few inconsistencies (obviously on my end). But I would like to kn…
... />
When I turned to section 3 and saw that it was ... then assumed that the first section was probably the experimental. So ... managed to get through 3 games in this section before hearing the ... to you guys) that the section 3 (for me) was the experimental ...February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
... second LG on my test (Section 3) was experimental.
Do ... , real game, third not first section. Did anyone else?
