HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 21.9K | 36.5K |
| 50 | 2.8K | 3.5K |
| section | 23.2K | 38.1K |
| 2 | 23.6K | 33.3K |
| q19 | 225 | 238 |
-
Point of Issue - Y/N list or honing in on difference?Hello there. Question on point of issue questions - which is better? doing the list method or reading through and determining the disagreement/agree…
Hey Quinn, a great example of the "MSS" is PT 61, Section 2 Q7.
Notice how Talbert didn't say anything about Chess should be taught. Talbert just lists good factors about chess which you have to imply that Talbert is for chess. -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
If any one is curious the question that I'm looking at with regards to the above is PT 49, Section 2 Question 17 -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
... "Some and Most Relationships." PT 30, Section 2, Q20 has an illustration of ... -
PT35.S2.P4 - ronald dworkin argues that judges arehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/ I am a long-time lurker that is gearing up for the October exam. I really…
Following up on RC: PT 35, Section 2
My specific questions include:< ... -
Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... recently gotten wrong include: Principle: PT 54 Section 2 Q18 (answered A, correct ... answer was C), PT 54 Section 4 Q9 ... answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 Q15 (answered B, correct answer ... -
PT74.S1.Q16 - debater: as a pedagogical practiceHi folks, I'm struggling with this question in BR. So I figured I'd post my reasoning and see what you all think of it. Debater: Premise 1:Be…
... as the LSAT (See PT 19 Section 2 Question 1 for a throwback ... -
PT76.S2.Q18 - an article claims that many medical patientsCan someone please explain in a real simple way I read the explanation but I just don't get it with these types of questions Thank you in advance …
... this PT although I did unusually worse on the RC section. Might ... 'd actually recommend re-visiting PT 23, Section 2, Question 16. It hinges ... -
Beliefs v. FactsI've only come across this type of flaw a few times, but I'd like to understand the structure behind it. The explanation and example offered in the c…
Just came across an excellent example of this flaw on a really, really valuable question: PT 31 Section 2 question 21. -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... phenomena can be found on PT 49 Section 2 Question 7. I've ... : I'm thinking here of PT 53 Section 1 Question 8. I ... -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... has drilling sets from particular PT ranges, something incredibly helpful.)
PT.
Because vague ... example: today I took PT 56. Section 3 Question 10 on that ... 12 days ago I reviewed PT 37 Section 2 Question 19, is the ... -
'Even without''even without' does not seem to follow our group 3 indicator rules.... Ella can pass even without giving her presentation Using Group 3 rules I…
... stuck on this while doing PT 37 section 2 qs 3.....such an ... -
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
OK, working on PT 9 - Section 2 - Question 23:
This ... stimulus. The second difficulty was 2) realizing that the missing sufficient ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... from my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
... /> -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... Necess flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... from my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
... -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... Necess flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we ... -
Confusing S for N versus N for SPremise: Resign--->Convicted Conclusion: Convicted--->Resign Would this be confusing N for S or S for N? I thought the two were interchangeable but…
The answer choice says confusing S for N though. That is why I am confused. PT 22, Section 2, #25 -
Using LawgicIve become familiar with the system of translation but Im still struggling to understand the practical use of making the translations. Is it just tha…
... separated from B by exactly 2 spots with A preceding B ... can help us.
2. The second practical use in ... illustration of this please see PT 49 Section 2 Question 7.
PT92.S2.Q21 (G4) - Why wouldn't F's commercial be first?Why isn't "FIGHK" possible? I think the answer should be C instead of E, help, I am loosing it... **Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the form…
I assume this is PT 92 - Section 2 - Game 4? Which question are you referencing?Suppose the condition "" was replaced with Tips?Does anyone have any tips for these questions? I tend to have to work through each answer choice to see if it would have a similar effect to the remo…
... a good example for this (PT 69, Section 2, Game 3, Question 17 ... just cross out 1 or 2 answer choices right off the ...PT schedule to follow for October '13Hi, I've currently only taken 2 PT's (50, June 2007). I purchased some LSAT question bundles from cambridge lsat and drilled a bunch of LG and RC…
... /> I've currently only taken 2 PT's (50, June 2007). I purchased ... taught, I would spend about 2-3 hours doing drills from ... good plan?
On PT 50 I screwed up hard on ... nerves and "retaking" the LR section I improved substantially. I have ...How do you know if you're ready to register for a test? Should do all PT's from 50-80?1. Should you aim to do every single PT in the past 10 years? (From PT's 50-80?) 2. How do you know when you're ready to take this test? 3. Or …
... 10 years? (From PT's 50-80?)
2. How do you ... -40 and have completed PT's 40-50.
I am ... hoping to try to do all PT ... 's from 50-80 these next few ...P47.S1.Q19 - When can you assume something is bad in contrast to the authorPT 47 Section 1 Question 19 In the stem it talks about a case of polio occurring due to the administration of a vaccine of 12 per year. By doing …
PT 47 Section 1 Question 19
... of the new polio is 2, then it's obvious to ... the alt. If it is 50, then it sucks
< ... title. Please use the format "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"**< ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-1-question-19/Is the LR in PT 81 insanely hard or am I just badTook PT's 50-59 and 70 up to 76 and have consistently been scoring in the 153 -155 range. Took PT 80 and got a 150 and its no big deal, transition fr…
Took PT's 50-59 and 70 up to ... the 153 -155 range. Took PT 80 and got a 150 ... , transition from 70's PT's to PT's in the 80 ... to take PT 81 and I did so bad in section 2 of ... so bad in this LR section Im kinda scared to continue ...The secret to do tough Weaken/strengthen questionToday I have a big progress in weaken/strengthen question. I find in most weaken/strengthen question, there exists a presumption and the only thing…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-37-section-2-question-20/
We an ... PT 52 S3 Q19
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-3 ... PT 52 S1 Q21.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section ...Getting lots of 'easiest' LRs wrong but 'harder' LRs right.I just took PT 59. In the PT scorer it says that section 2 LR is "easiest" and section 3 is "harder". I got 50% accuracy on section 2 but 84% accurac…
... took PT 59. In the PT scorer it says that section 2 LR ... is "easiest" and section 3 ... is "harder". I got 50 ... % accuracy on section 2 but 84% accuracy on section 3. If ...How to study for the 3rd Retake???I dreamed about getting a JD in the US before I came here but I didn’t dare to even look at a LSAT question because I wasn’t that confident in Englis…
... being 169. But the last 2 (PT 48 & 49) I ... the low-mid 160s during PT 50-55. I thought it was ... mid-high 160s in PT 55-60, with 2 low 170s.
2 PTs back to back in ... about cancelling during the first section. I barely finished them in ...PT 72 Section 3Is section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT 72 is weird and I shouldn't be discouraged by lower scores on this test than the others.…
... section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT ... on the first LR section of this PT but I did horribly ... on section 3. What are your ... experiences with this PT?Superprep 2 PTHas anyone taken the never-before-disclosed PT from Superprep 2?
Has anyone taken the never-before-disclosed PT from Superprep 2?
