... Cookie Cutter Review on each PT. This seems to be ...
For example, PT22.S2.Q25 had three cookie-cutter answer ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-2-question-25/#comment- ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-09/#comment-61721
... '18 Study Group | Blind Review PT50 | Tuesday, Feb 6th | 7:30 ... />
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... '18 Study Group | Blind Review PT50
Tue, Feb 6th, 2018 ...
... style. I stumbled upon pt. 16 game 4. This is the hardest ... ever seen. I thought PT.12 (game 4?) the flask game was ... me ur reactions to pt 16 game 4, whatever they may be ...
... highly problematic. Check out PT 1 Section4 Question 21 Answers D & ... " it would have to include 50%, but I think most of ... us would consider 50% of anything considerably more than ...
... a particularly daunting example: PT 27 Section4 Question 14. What I ... and second workers **_approved_** 50 books. For the first worker ... , that 50 books constituted 50% of the total ... worker, in which that 50 books approved constituted 1% ...
"Downtown petropolis boasted over 100 large buildings 5 years ago".
By poe I kind of am able to get to the answer E , bUT I don't understand why that is the answer.
Why "significantly fewer than 60"?? Is 100 the staple number of buildings ...
Main Point question, I agonize between B and E. B is wrong because they never said it was not the only factor? But isn't E wrong as well because the conclusion was about unlikely that a prediction will occur where as E said probably will not? Isn't E ...
... more game changing. In my PT 22, Section4, Question 14, answer choice ... experienced a difference between their PT's language and what 7sage ... ? I'm not worried my PT's are severely messed up ...