HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 52 | 440 | 519 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
-
Group Blind Review, but not on Saturday?Hi everyone, I felt I benefited from the last group Skype BR, and would like to do this more. Saturdays don't always work for me, though. Would an…
Of course, @"Dillon A. Wright"! Monday at 8pm EST. PM me your Skype name and I'll add you to the call. The only condition is that you take and review PT 52 beforehand ;-D -
Weekly Goal-Setting & Accountability ThreadHi everyone, I'm taking somewhat of an LSAT hiatus for March (school, it happens) but I'm going to start a goal-setting/accountability thread here…
... PTs. Took and group BRed PT 52. This week:
-PTs ... Game per day (except full PT days)
-1 RC science ... set per day (except full PT days) -
Retake QuestionsAlright, I'll try to make this as short as possible. I'm trying to decide whether or not to take the Oct. 2015 test, which would be my third time. I…
... you took each PT previously. I would save PT 72 (and any ... alternative, just pick up with PT 52 and join us for the ... -
Retake QuestionsAlright, I'll try to make this as short as possible. I'm trying to decide whether or not to take the Oct. 2015 test, which would be my third time. I…
... said:
I would save PT 72 (and any other untouched ... alternative, just pick up with PT 52 and join us for the ... -
BR Groups, Week of July 8th: Weds (PT52), Fri (PT70), Sat (PT53)Edit: LOL much date confusion. Well, I missed the Friday call because vacation and now I have sad feels. BR withdrawal feels. So let's get back o…
@JuliaZLSAT said:
PT 52 is June 2007, correct?
< ... -
What Prep Tests should I do?I finished the core course about 2 weeks ago, and am now in prep test mode. I will be done Prep Tests 39-45, by next Wednesday, and unfortunately …
I would focus on 2 PT since it allows you to ... . I won't take a PT if I know I won ... time to fully BR that PT because I've learn the ... your aim to take every PT available 36-72? If so ... ready to move on to PT 52 before you book arrives I ... -
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
Pt 15 - S4 - Game 2 (Country of ... lawgic
Pt 6 - S4 - Game 4 (Network of Bridges ... lines
Pt 6- S4- Game 3 (eight benches)
Pt 4 - S3 - Game 4 (Ski ... brute force.
Pt 16- S1- Game 4 (Tennis ... -
How valuable are retake PT scoresJust wondering how valuable a retake score is. I took some later PTs (60s) back in March/April long before I discovered 7sage. If I thoroughly erase …
@c.janson35 i JUST DID pt 52 so im really feeling the unicorn/centaur feels -
Non-October Test Takers’ BR Group: September 23rd: Weds (PT51)<img src="http://www.lisastudier.com/images/walrus1.jpg" > </center> <h1>WEDNESDAY, September 23rd at 8PM ET: PT51</h1> <h1>Note:</h1> <ul> …
@louis2014 i plan on hosting every Wednesday. Next week will be PT 52. If people are interested in other days, I'm happy to set them up even though I probably won't be attending those calls. -
Blind Review of GamesQuick Question: After I watch the video for the game why keep doing it? Is it not just memorization, not actual learning?
... make sure. When I do PT 52 (which I know has a ... -
PT 46 S4 Game 3 Question# 12<i>Hey 7Sagers, had someone email me with a question and I thought you guys could help out! Here it is:</i> I have a question or comment regar…
@"Dillon A. Wright" said:
Hey 7Sagers
I thought for a second Dillon had finally started studying for the LSAT for real!
I believe you still owe us some real-time logic games ... ;) -
Could really use some guidance.I am getting really flustered to be completely honest. I am not getting much better at this test due to the fact that I just tend to overthink every …
... the questions I missed on PT 52 were pretty tough to be ... -
June Test Takers Group BR Schedule (updated)<img src="http://anticapitalists.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/lets-get-organized-3.jpg" > </center> My fellow June Test-takers! Please take…
... , 2016 June LSAT BR Group PT 40
Tues Jan ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 74
Sat Feb 20 ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 49
Thurs Feb ... m June LSAT BR Group PT 52
Tues Mar 8, 2016 ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 68
Sat Apr ... -
Reading and ComprehenisionI was curious to know if there are any comparative reading passages for practice? So far from the lesson plan I have not seen any!
There aren't, because JY only uses old LSATs for the problem sets, to leave all the recent ones pristine for full length PT practice. The comparative passages were introduced in PT 52, and the problem sets use PT 1-38ish. -
June Test-Takers, Week of Feb 29th: Tues (PT 51), Thurs (PT71), and Sat (PT 52)<img src="http://mittromneycentral.com/uploads/june-3.jpg"> </center> Here’s the schedule this week: <h1>BR GROUPS </h1> <h1>Tuesday, Mar…
Just checking to see if anyone will be on BR call Saturday night for PT 52? Please:) -
RC PassagesTypically, it takes me 5/6 minutes to read an entire passage without ignoring anything. How in the world can one read some of these lengthy and b…
... understand it. I just took PT 52 and was laughing pretty hard ... -
DrillingHi everyone. I'm trying to figure out what the best way to drill is. I'm working my way through the course and I am thinking that I should be dri…
... do NOT drill with PrepTest 52 and later. These 26 "modern ... PT every 3 days):
PT 52-61 (book of 10)
PT ... -71 (book of 10)
PT 72-77 (6 individual booklets ... -
What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... some in the LSAT context. PT 62 S4 (towards the end, the ... -
What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... case of the question mentioned (PT 62, S4, Q23), the incorrect answer ... -
LG - Sequencing, Double Layer, Twist... Heeeelp...I am just not getting these down. Help!!
I started drilling this week utilizing LG sections from PT 52, 53, and 54. I either get lost with my board set up or I get lost attempted to make inferences and split my boards. Something always goes awry. -
Back on track..where should I start?Hey guys, little background information, I studied for LSAT for six months during which I finished the syllabus, did couple of PT and did the Bundle …
... , Congrats! If you can, take PT 52 that will be covered on ... LG so hopefully taking a PT as @"Cant Get Right" said ... -
Underachiever!?So I'm aware I'm not trying to get into a T-14 school. I have actually set my eyes on a rather low ranking regional school, where I intend to live af…
... 16 Week Study Schedule
PT 36-77 (feel free to ... -44 and LSAT Trainer uses PT 52-71. But feel free to ... -
PT34.S4.G4 - each of exactly six doctorsHi All, I've been pretty good with setting up and reading conditional chains for in-and-out games but for some reason I'm really confused with th…
@CrushLSAT said:
question 19 (which asks for a complete and accurate list of doctors at Souderton) be E (N and P)? Why can't the ~N --> J pair be treated the same as ~O --> J? If we only have N and P, aren't we still good since we have at ... -
Chart skeptic's challenge: show me a game for which a chart definitely saves timeI've just gone through the "Grouping Games with a Chart" lessons, and for each of the four games -- two in the lessons and two in the problem set -- …
Just ran into another example: PT 47 S4 G3 -- record stores and music ... -
PT72.S4.G1 - a radio station airs hourly news updatesA condition stated is "Within each segment, reports are ordered by length, from longest to shortest." For purposes of my question I'd like to emphasi…
@"steve-10" said:
The correct answer to Q1, the typical "acceptable configuration" question, implies T — W (where "—" is the usual notation indicating relative order).
Well, it does imply that T -- W is a possibility. T -- W ... -
PT52.S1.Q24 - in response to several bacterial infectionsI know answer choice B is not supported but I can't explain to myself WHY it's wrong. Is it wrong because the terms "apple" and "citrus" should be…
@lllllllll said:
Because McElligott's citrus juices HAVE NOT BEEN LINKED TO ANY BACTERIAL INFECTIONS, can't I assume that they contain less infectious bacteria than M'S apple juice?
No, you can never assume. All we know is that the ... -
Contrapositive of embedded conditionals?The user and all related content has been deleted.
Example statement from PT 62.S4.Q18: "If there are sentient ... -
Intermediate conclusionsI'm having trouble differentiating the IC from the premises and I don't like IC questions in general...if something leads to a conclusion then it mak…
... intermediate conclusion. An example is PT 30 S4 Q13. The subsidiary(intermediate ...
