HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 53 | 243 | 300 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
-
Identifying flawsI'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw? Is PT 52 S3 Q4 …
I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT 54 S4 Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks -
or and both Conditional Chain rulesConfused as to why we did not chain the second rule, O---> P/ (PT36 S4 G1). Previously in PT 33 S4 game 2 there was a similar condition and we did pu…
... ---> P/ (PT36 S4 G1). Previously in PT 33 S4 game 2 there ... " conditional statements. Additionally we had PT 23 S1 G2 where we ... -
Can I still improve LR by Oct 5?I'm still getting like 10 wrong in LR and its disheartening because I've been taking timed sections out of PTs (don't have time to do full length exc…
... this is what I mean... PT 53: 168 actual/179 BR
Anyone taken PT 53? That LR was brutal wasn ... -
Today is Sept 3. How do I plan out this month for Oct LSAT?Currently on PT 57. Due to time limitations I am taking every 1-2 LSATs as full length timed, and doing the in-betweens as timed sections. Devoti…
... doing:
I'm on PT 53. I'm taking 3 PTs ... my weaknesses, on my non-PT days (at least for the ... -
some/many in answer choicesHey everyone, I am really confused about the use of 'many' (or some) in LR answer choices. In some cases many/some is dismissed as insignificant bec…
... argument-- what about #8 in pt 53 in section 1? Answer choice ... -
Scores Dropping -- testing in December!!!I feel like I know what everyone is going to say but please help me. I was scoring in the low 170s. I had worked my way up there, finally breaking th…
What pt's are you doing? Theres ... you progress through certain pt's. For instance, pt 57 and so ... a tad bit harder after pt 53 (imo) where the LR sufficient ... convoluted/abstract compared to older pt's) after the mid 50 ... -
PT 50--beginning of the major changes?I just took PT 50 and I felt like I did not even know how to complete the exam. I have familiarized myself with the test since December, but I felt …
@nicole.hopkins
I got another 169 on PT 53 :)
I changed two answers to an incorrect answer choice, which means I would have gotten a 171. I was so angry lol -
TONIGHT! PT52 BR | 8:30pm ET<h1> PT52 BR Tonight at 8:30pm ET</h1> Don't miss out on tonight's PT52 blind review group, featuring none other than the infamous ... <center> …
... , you guys are going over PT 53 this Saturday?
Is ... -
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
Pt 15 - S4 - Game 2 (Country of ... lawgic
Pt 6 - S4 - Game 4 (Network of Bridges ... lines
Pt 6- S4- Game 3 (eight benches)
Pt 4 - S3 - Game 4 (Ski ... brute force.
Pt 16- S1- Game 4 (Tennis ... -
Striving for 180 BR !I have been stuck in the 155-158 range for a month and, recently, I broke into the early 160s (160-161 last couple PTs). As many people suggested on…
@kylemitchellx I am on PT 53 and my plan is to take 3 PTs each week until the 3rd week of September -
group 3 rules pt 52 g3Hey! So I think I'm confusing myself but the game states: Telemarketing will not be given until both Goals and Objections have been given. then the …
... the same as a biconditional? pt 53 g2 say's that "Green ... -
What are the hardest LSAT tests ever released?Let's tackle these!
... toned down a bit in PT 67+ or so.
PT 72.
Agreed re ... PT 72 not being all that ... , I'd say for me PT 53. It had some weird games ... -
PT 46 S4 Game 3 Question# 12<i>Hey 7Sagers, had someone email me with a question and I thought you guys could help out! Here it is:</i> I have a question or comment regar…
@"Dillon A. Wright" said:
Hey 7Sagers
I thought for a second Dillon had finally started studying for the LSAT for real!
I believe you still owe us some real-time logic games ... ;) -
What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... some in the LSAT context. PT 62 S4 (towards the end, the ... -
What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... case of the question mentioned (PT 62, S4, Q23), the incorrect answer ... -
PT34.S4.G4 - each of exactly six doctorsHi All, I've been pretty good with setting up and reading conditional chains for in-and-out games but for some reason I'm really confused with th…
@CrushLSAT said:
question 19 (which asks for a complete and accurate list of doctors at Souderton) be E (N and P)? Why can't the ~N --> J pair be treated the same as ~O --> J? If we only have N and P, aren't we still good since we have at ... -
Chart skeptic's challenge: show me a game for which a chart definitely saves timeI've just gone through the "Grouping Games with a Chart" lessons, and for each of the four games -- two in the lessons and two in the problem set -- …
Just ran into another example: PT 47 S4 G3 -- record stores and music ... -
PT72.S4.G1 - a radio station airs hourly news updatesA condition stated is "Within each segment, reports are ordered by length, from longest to shortest." For purposes of my question I'd like to emphasi…
@"steve-10" said:
The correct answer to Q1, the typical "acceptable configuration" question, implies T — W (where "—" is the usual notation indicating relative order).
Well, it does imply that T -- W is a possibility. T -- W ... -
Contrapositive of embedded conditionals?The user and all related content has been deleted.
Example statement from PT 62.S4.Q18: "If there are sentient ... -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... phenomena can be found on PT 49 Section 2 Question 7 ... : I'm thinking here of PT 53 Section 1 Question 8. I ... -
Quick weakening/attack premises questionI had a quick question - based on the 7sage lessons on weakening, you never directly attack a premise or conclusion; rather, you take support away fr…
... citation.
I think PT 53 Section1 Question 8 is a ... -
Intermediate conclusionsI'm having trouble differentiating the IC from the premises and I don't like IC questions in general...if something leads to a conclusion then it mak…
... intermediate conclusion. An example is PT 30 S4 Q13. The subsidiary(intermediate ... -
RC - only downfall / fills me with rageHey all, So I just took PT 53 and scored a 169. Hoooray, right? Not quite. I scored a -1 in LG, -2 between both LR sections and a -9 in RC. Yes, a…
... /> > So I just took PT 53 and scored a 169. Hoooray ... -
RC - only downfall / fills me with rageHey all, So I just took PT 53 and scored a 169. Hoooray, right? Not quite. I scored a -1 in LG, -2 between both LR sections and a -9 in RC. Yes, a…
... ; > So I just took PT 53 and scored a 169. Hoooray ... -
RC - only downfall / fills me with rageHey all, So I just took PT 53 and scored a 169. Hoooray, right? Not quite. I scored a -1 in LG, -2 between both LR sections and a -9 in RC. Yes, a…
... ; > So I just took PT 53 and scored a 169. Hoooray ... -
"Mathy" Questions drilling?Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... ) (overgeneralization)
PT 50, S4, #22 (36)
PT 51, S1, #4 ... MBT)
PT 27, S4, #14 (312) (MBT)
PT 30, S4, #22 (76 ... br /> NA
PT 10, S4, #4 (104)
PT 16, S2, #14 ... PT 14, S4, #7 (242)
PT 19, S2, #18 (25)
PT 19, S4 ...
