I narrowed it down to (A) derisive condescension and (B) open dissatisfaction, and then picked (A) after referring back to the language about how Gilliam was "impatient" with strictly representational art. In retrospect, I can see how (A) connotes too ...
For those of you who have done LR questions from PT's 1-16 and also PT's 35 and above, do you feel that the older PT's LR questions are a bit more difficult or not as straight forward? What are your opinions?
I’m taking PT, don’t score some of them, leaving for blind review. As of now, I have for br PT54 (RC), 55, 56(LR), 54(LR), 61(LR), and going up. Please let me know if you are interested br one of these PT any time soon
I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT54 S4 Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks
... less consistent. For example, PT 1 is utterly different in ... the LG, than is PT 66 (which I took ... br />
PT 41: 4 wrong, 178 PT 48: 5 wrong ... , 174 PT 66 ... 1 more question wrong? PT 48 was scaled so ...
... morning bombed LG games on PT 66 but did great on ... . Last three taken: PT 65-161 PT54-161 PT-66 this morning 161 ... and hoping to see my PT average bump up a few ... points. Thinking of doing PT 72 next week as most ...
... said:
Today, i took PT54 and scored 167.
I ... couple days' break from new PT's to let the good ... want to rush into more PT's too quickly so that ...
... the same question PT2/Section 4/#16 (Weaken). At first read ... measurable amount of helium-4 gas found in the ... though the amount of Helium-4 was measurable, the amount ... this level of Helium-4 is no reason to ... higher concentration of Helium-4 broke down? We are ...