HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 54 | 229 | 268 |
| s2 | 1.2K | 1.6K |
| q9 | 86 | 92 |
-
How can I get better at translating conditional logic arguments!?Damn... I was doing PT23 S2 Q9, and have no idea to connect and translate the words. If I were to look in the question bank, how do I separate the…
Damn... I was doing PT23 S2 Q9, and have no idea to ... answer process of question PT23 S2 Q9 :
ARGUMENT: Every action ... -
Need Help with MSS v. Strengthen, v. Correlation/Causation StrengthenI am stuck on some of the MSS questions, Weaken, and the difference with how to tell MSS and Strengthen apart especially when C/C Strengthen is in pl…
... play.
For example, PT 16, S2, Q21 was on a webinar ... -
PT 34.S2.Q11 - some psychologists claim thatFlaw Question-- calling all folks who are a beast at LR:) HELP? I understand that the answer is C but I want to make sure that I'm breaking down …
Flaw Question-- calling all folks who are a beast at LR:) HELP?
I understand that the answer is C but I want to make sure that I'm breaking down the argument correctly:
*Best way to understand --> Direct Empathy (that's what some ... -
Just hit my first 180!Long time observer, first time poster here. Just hit my first perfect score ever on PT 54. Went -1 RC, -1 LR, -0 LG. I scored a 165 on the June test…
... first perfect score ever on PT 54. Went -1 RC, -1 LR ... and over my last 20 PT's I'm averaging a ... -
Meaning of "excludes," different than "presumes" or "takes for granted"?Hello all, I was reviewing PT 77 S2 Q18 (link below) and was having a bit of trouble clarifying my thinking on it. If an argument "fails to exc…
... />
I was reviewing PT 77 S2 Q18 (link below) and was ... -
Causation/correlation and phenomenonHello, everyone. I’ve been drilling strengthening questions and I’m having an issue with causation/correlation and phenomenon type arguments. The lin…
... arguments. I initially had PT 25-S2-Q10 as causation because I ... my greatest worry. For PT23-S2-Q14 I initially chose phenomenon ... -
LR "curve-breaker questions" list?Hey guys! I'm sure most of you, like me, get excited whenever JY says that a question is a curve breaker question and you happened to get it right. I…
Approach for January?I'm starting my retake prep now for January 26th. I got a [removed] on the November 17th LSAT and am hoping to get that up to 165-169 on the January …
... my main obstacle; I took PT 54 before November's test and ...Biconditionals -- Chaining vs Splitting?This has come up briefly before on the forums, but I wanted to ask more about chaining biconditionals rather than splitting. On PT 54 game 1, because…
... biconditionals rather than splitting. On PT 54 game 1, because I wasn ...LSAT BR Group for July 15th 2019 (Extension from June group)Hi All, We are the “extension group” for the LSAT July 15th. We will be doing a BR Session every Sunday, starting on Sunday, June 2, from 7:00pm-…
... June 2, 7-9pm EST, PT 74
Sunday, June ... 9, 7-9pm EST, PT 76
Sunday, June ... 16, 7-9pm EST, PT 79
Sunday, June ... July 7, 7-9pm EST, PT - TBD
Sunday, July ... ( any suggestions?):
PT 54
PT 56
PT 59
Wildly Inconsistent LR Scores after completing the Core Curriculum. Plz HelpSince completion of the CC, my LR scores have been ridiculously inconsistent. Here are the stats: PT 40 S1 -9 S3 -4 PT 41 S1 -4 S3 -3 PT 42 S2 -…
... are the stats:
PT 40 S1 -9 S3 -4 ... -3
PT 42 S2 -4 S4 -6
PT 43 S2 -8 S3 ... -2
PT 58 S1 -2 ...PT 72 S2 Q12 NA QuestionI am confused about the word “generally” in the conclusion. **To Recap The argument form in Lawgic:** **P1**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed) **…
I am confused about the word “generally” in the conclusion.
**To Recap The argument form in Lawgic:**
**P1**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed)
**Required Premise**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed)-> Generally /(Able to choose ...PT 2 S2 Question 4 Can I infer some people are -P from the statement that most people are P?Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but …
Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but the correct AC of this question seems to suggest the otherwise. Is this a bad LR question?PT 18.S2.Q2Hey fellow 7Sagers, I'm having some trouble understanding this question. Here is how I diagrammed it: CR ----->/LW SRO---->LW (and th…
Hey fellow 7Sagers,
I'm having some trouble understanding this question.
Here is how I diagrammed it:
CR ----->/LW
SRO---->LW
(and then I diagrammed the last premise)
L CR
...PT30.S2.Q9- Running Track with a Hard SurfaceThe question stem for this question asks us to pick an answer choice that shows that the explanation we were given in the stimulus is only a "partial…
The question stem for this question asks us to pick an answer choice that shows that the explanation we were given in the stimulus is only a "partial one." I was doing this question as part of my weakening problem set. I read through the stimulus and was ...HELP I can't understand this question no matter where I look.If someone could help me with this question and show why every AC is wrong and why the right one is right it would be very helpful. PT 2 S2 Questio…
... be very helpful.
PT 2 S2 Question 11
"If the ...PT9 S2 Q9I understand the conclusion is saying that the airlines should remove seats that impede the exit because many fatalities are due to the cabin design …
I understand the conclusion is saying that the airlines should remove seats that impede the exit because many fatalities are due to the cabin design of the seats. Here is my issue, many = some.. so when I look at it this way maybe 1 collision is like this ...Zoom study buddyI’m taking PT, don’t score some of them, leaving for blind review. As of now, I have for br PT 54 (RC), 55, 56(LR), 54(LR), 61(LR), and going up. Ple…
I’m taking PT, don’t score some of them, leaving for blind review. As of now, I have for br PT 54 (RC), 55, 56(LR), 54(LR), 61(LR), and going up. Please let me know if you are interested br one of these PT any time soonEmbedded conditional helpHi. I need help with something. I know how embedded conditionals work. For example A---> (B---->C) then it becomes A and B ----->C But what hap…
... ;B. Its a question from PT 74 S2 Q24. Its really tripping ...PT 21.S2.Q15 - Setting executives salariesI don't understand how executives from other companies setting salaries higher could have an impact on the salaries of executives from other companie…
I don't understand how executives from other companies setting salaries higher could have an impact on the salaries of executives from other companies?
**Admin Note:** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-2-question-15/PT M20.S2.G3For game three, do ya'll just brute force your way through? Or is there something I'm missing?
For game three, do ya'll just brute force your way through? Or is there something I'm missing?How to answer "substituted condition" question? explanation video?I need help with trying to answer the questions that ask something along the lines of "Which of following could substitute the condition (insert rule…
I need help with trying to answer the questions that ask something along the lines of "Which of following could substitute the condition (insert rule here)"? I don't know how to approach these at all.
Example: PT M20.S2.Q11PT 89.S2.Q7 - Dire wolvesAfter reading this stimulus, I thought the author was assuming the dire wolves were trapped in the tar pits while hunting and scavenging. Is that cor…
After reading this stimulus, I thought the author was assuming the dire wolves were trapped in the tar pits while hunting and scavenging. Is that correct? I was confused about the use of language in answer choice D; what does most frequently actually mean? ...PT85.S2.Q9 - Pharmaceutical manufacturersThe stimulus talks about the number of visits per representative decreasing from 640 to 501, but does that mean the number of visits per pharmacist d…
The stimulus talks about the number of visits per representative decreasing from 640 to 501, but does that mean the number of visits per pharmacist decreased as well? Is it possible the number of visits per pharmacist from these representatives possibly ...Great Game to understand: Core inference LSAC expects you to knowHello, about a week ago I posed a discussion about my process on getting to -0(link below). Today I came across a game that is really good to know. P…
... is really good to know. PT 63 S2 G1. This is an ...PT 89.S2.Q24 - The increase in minimum wage in Country XHey y'all-- I posted this under the Q-specific help vid, but the discussion forum here seems to get more attention sometimes, so double-posting. P…
Hey y'all--
I posted this under the Q-specific help vid, but the discussion forum here seems to get more attention sometimes, so double-posting. Promise to add helpful responses I get to my original discussion for our future LSAT progeny :3< ...PT 57.S2.Q24 - Great poemsI have read the explanation on this question and am still having trouble. P1: Sometimes a reader believes that a poem is expressing contradictor…
I have read the explanation on this question and am still having trouble.
P1: Sometimes a reader believes that a poem is expressing contradictory ideas
P2: No one ever means to communicate contradictory ideas
Conc: ...
