HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 55 | 394 | 468 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.8K |
| qustion | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | 3.1K | 3.7K |
-
Left Over TimeHi, I know I am fortunate to have this problem, but I consistently find myself with roughly 7 minutes left to twiddle my thumbs on RC sections and am…
... understood to mean "for each section". 1 section = all 4 passages in RC ... , etc. So if I get -1 in RC, it means I ... -
Is it possible to have experimental section 1If LR was 1,3,5 is it possible for 1 to be experimental?
I think for sure! It can be any section. I think my logic games section 1 was experimental -
Is it possible to have experimental section 1If LR was 1,3,5 is it possible for 1 to be experimental?
I think you and I may have had the same test book format. If my experimental wasn't the LR in section 1, then I am screwed!!!!!! At one point in that section, I literally played the clip of JY in my head saying "What the fuck is happening to me right now." -
Reflection on December14 LSATHi all lovely 7 sagers, just want to write down some reflections I feel for this just finished LSAT and see if anyone, particularly if the 7 Sage ins…
... the 35 minutes of a section, that's rediculous. Break time ... fan on mid way through section 1 and it made an obnoxious ... off. Then, during the written section, I could hear them discussing ... person also "gave up" last section and sat there looking like ... -
Reflection on December14 LSATHi all lovely 7 sagers, just want to write down some reflections I feel for this just finished LSAT and see if anyone, particularly if the 7 Sage ins…
... 'm hit by Logic Games Section 1 - my mind could not compute ... . Tick tock. The worst LG section I've ever done. Not ... -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
If any one is curious the question that I'm looking at with regards to the above is PT 49, Section 2 Question 17 -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
... "Some and Most Relationships." PT 30, Section 2, Q20 has an illustration ... -
Take Your TimeA couple days ago I scored a 174 on PT 64 using the LSAT proctor app. My average over the last 5 has been a 172.5. About 10 months ago my cold diagno…
... of mediocrity at the section.
1. know when rules trigger ... -
Lower scores on PTsHi everyone, I need your advice. I am going to take Feb LSAT. About a month ago, my scores on PTs were 158-162. However, I took 3 PTs in last 2 week…
I am not nervous at all. I got 158-162 on all PTs from PT #55-69. BR was fine, too. Thanks for your suggestions. -
Practice vs the Real ThingFor those of you who have sat for an official LSAT already, what was the biggest difference between actual game day and practice PTs?
... /3s of the way through section 1 to start to relax and ... -
February test done!Well, LSAT over and today was my last LSAT day EVER as I've already been accepted to what is probably my #1 law school choice, taking all factors int…
I think section 1 was the experimental, judging by comments on reddit -
How should I slow myself downAlright, as a little background to this, I've always read super fast. As such I never run out of time on the Logical Reasoning Sections, ever. I usua…
... usually around 4-5 Per section. 1 wrong on RC, 2 on ... -
PT1.S3.Q21 - the energy an animalI have a question in terms of dissecting the conclusion-premise structure of the stimulus. So here is my question in relation to identifying/disse…
... LSAT Answers & Explanations - LR » Section #1, (https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat ... if there are certain
1) Observed Phenomenon
and
1) Observed Phenomenon.
In ... -
NA question typesI was wondering if anyone has found a way that works best to approach these question types? If so, PLEASE share.
... , I’m BR-ing PT 36 s.1. #20 (been staring and ... -
website running slow?is the site running super slow for anyone else? takes forever for the videos to load since the 21st....
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-1-question-14/
Sorry ... -
website running slow?is the site running super slow for anyone else? takes forever for the videos to load since the 21st....
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-1-question-14/
Sorry ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-1-question-21/ -
website running slow?is the site running super slow for anyone else? takes forever for the videos to load since the 21st....
... also freezes right at the 1:24 mark for me. When ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-1-question-22/ -
Logical Reasoning: assumption and weaken questionsHi! I'm having some major troubles with assumption and "which will weaken the argument" questions...any tips would REALLY be appreciated at this poin…
... /> Heres an example, Preptest 64 Section 1 question 13:
[removed ... -
PTs 70-74 for the final weekI've yet to take the 70-74 exams. Instead of squeezing in all five, I want to take and thoroughly BR 2-3 in the last week. Does anyone know if an…
@"Dr. Yamata" said:
but only get 11 wrong for a 170 on PT 73 and 74
-12*
I would recommending taking a PT you have done in the past for an ego booster but def take sunday off. -
LSAT Score - Does it Stick?The only two schools I have my sights set on (both top 30 schools) are waiting for this score to possibly admit me for the next academic year. Alth…
From reading your post, no, sounds like you are referring to a later games section that would have been real. If you had 2 lg and 1 was in section 1 then that one was experimental. -
I thought "some" statements don't have the ability to strengthen or weaken?I've seen lots of debate over whether or not some statements have the ability to strengthen or weaken arguments. The general consensus seems to be th…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-1-question-16/ the correct AC ... -
Logic Games Attack StrategySo I've got three weeks left in the Army before I start terminal leave and I've finally reached the end of the learning curriculum and the only thing…
... and four rows (Attempts 1-4) like I said, ... you're starting with PT 7 and made all ... br />
PT 7
LG 1
Date Time ... -
PT28.S1.Q24 - we ought to pay attentionhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-1-question-24/ Could anyone explain which sentence of this question's stimulus is the conclusion?…
Here's the master guru J.Y explaining this question. It's a tough one, and it seems like a lot of people thought that the first sentence was the conclusion.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-1-question-24/ -
PT28.S1.Q26 - modern navigation systemshttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-1-question-26/ I chose D but the answer is E. I still don't understand why E is an answer. If pl…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-1-question-26/ -
PT28.S1.Q25 - mckinley: a double-blind studyI really don't understand why C can't be an answer. McKinley said the drug will have various effects on the patients' bodies. But he also said it wi…
Full detailed explanation:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-1-question-25/ -
Re-reading Game RulesI read an article on LSAT HACKS making the case to re-read the rules 4 times as per the below guidelines: 1] To understand the game. 2] To draw. …
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-1-game-1/
Then if ... -
Problem Set Changes Going Live Tonight (Wednesday night / Thursday morning)Good news, we finished the problem set changes! The <strong>problem set overhaul is going live tonight (Wednesday night / Thursday morning) at: 12…
... game designation; it specifies which PT and section, but not which specific ... -
Problem Set Changes Going Live Tonight (Wednesday night / Thursday morning)Good news, we finished the problem set changes! The <strong>problem set overhaul is going live tonight (Wednesday night / Thursday morning) at: 12…
... game designation; it specifies which PT and section, but not which specific ...
