HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22.1K | 36.7K |
| 62 | 468 | 561 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
| q5 | 64 | 69 |
-
Subtle LR changes in PT 80+Hi everyone, I had been practicing with the LSAT official books (50s, 60s, 70s) and I recently purchased the 80s via 7sage. I noticed that in the …
... didn't... for example, in PT 83 section 1 #18 (LR ... -
First post-CC PT - 22 point BR increase!I know so many people on here are scoring 160+, but I just took my first post-CC PT and I feel great. Diagnostic was a 145, scored a 152 on my first …
... took my first post-CC PT and I feel great. Diagnostic ... on my BR of that PT. Lots of time until the ... -
PT 88 BR oct 26Hello everybody! With a fresh PT just released and LSAT writings around the corner I figure its time to host another public Blind Review seeing as…
... !
With a fresh PT just released and LSAT writings ... there who want to do PT 88 before they are released ... a blind review session for PT 88 next Saturday at 11 ... -
How many PT's do you need to take?HI All! I was on track to take the November LSAT, but I decided to push back to January and strictly focus on taking PT's, and build speed and acc…
... and strictly focus on taking PT's, and build speed and ... was wondering about how many PT's is it recommended to ... -
PT88.S4.Q26 - SA Q on microbes/methaneI got this question wrong because I misidentified the conclusion. I thought the last sentence was the conclusion and the second sentence was a premis…
... ; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description ... -
PT88.S4.Q24 - Can you weaken causal relations with “no cause, but effect”Powerscore says 1 way to weaken a casual conclusion is to show that “Although effect occurs, the cause did not occur.” This is bc (According to po…
... cause.
But in PT 88.4.24, AC A ... ; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description ... -
PT88.S4.Q13 - There are many poets with cheerful dispositionsDoes anyone else thing AP questions are getting harder? I chose D for this because it reads more like a clarification - or even a necessary assumptio…
... ; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description ... -
PT11.S4.Q24 - Mainstream economic theory holds that manufacturersWhat are the parts of this argument? <strong>Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"</strong>
What are the parts of this argument?
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]" -
PT88.S4.Q22 - “Environmental factors, sports, teenagers...”Can anyone explain this question for me? Have no idea why the right answer is right and how it weakens argument. Thanks <strong>Admin note: edite…
Can anyone explain this question for me? Have no idea why the right answer is right and how it weakens argument. Thanks
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"
