HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22.1K | 36.7K |
| 64 | 227 | 256 |
| section | 23.4K | 38.4K |
| 1 | 27.2K | 41K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 20 | 4.5K | 5.4K |
-
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
What ... to prepare:
Complete PT 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark it ... -
[Free LR Tutoring] - PT86.1.Q-Evens Tuesday 9pm CST.What's up 7Sagers, it's your cringe-master, **S**trong-**I**ndependent-**M**an-of-**P**assion, i-think-the-lsat-is-a-cunt, _lsat_sus._ Do you ever…
... free LR tutoring session on PT 86 Section 1 EVENS. **Try to have ... our sessions (imo).
1. Goals - prove to you why ... .** note whether or not the Q yielded a predictable pre-phrase ... -
"In fact" = "But"?Does "In fact" function as a transitional indicator? That is, does in fact signal the switch from context to argument? eg (PT 64 section III Q 22) …
... context to argument?
eg (PT 64 section III Q 22)
scientists astounding ... -
Mistaking sufficiency for necessity vs mistaking necessity for sufficiencyI'm a bit confused about the technical differences between the errors of (1) mistaking sufficiency or necessity and (2) mistaking necessity for suffi…
... mistake. That question is: Pt 51 Section 1 Question 20. That is the only ... to do beyond or BR PT 56.
In my ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where the question ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where the question ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
>
PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. ... -
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSSpt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS Hi Everyone, I was stuck on this question, and I was wondering if someone can take a look at my breakdown of this question to…
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS
Hi ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-21/
this ... />
This is incorrect because q stem doesn't state that ... -
September Study Group | PT 64 | Sunday, July 16 @ 7p EDT / 6p CST / 4p PST | HARRY POTTER POLL!Attention : I am planning on closing this group off within the next few weeks. I highly recommend you make an effort to show up to these next few me…
... /> ###Test Details:
**PT:** 64
**Experimental Section:** RC From PT58
For our full PT schedule please see the following ... /> * Please take the PT under strictly timed conditions. < ... phone.
United States: +1 (872) 240-3311
... -
[Ended] That'sSoRavenclaw | PT 64 Tues. July 18th 7pm ESTRC review Next up is PT 64 <img src="https://media4.giphy.com/media/opKYGBYeYC3DO/giphy.gif"/> <h1>PT 64 w/experimental LR fr PT40 (2nd LR secti…
... PT 64
PT 64 w/experimental LR fr PT40 (2nd LR section ... your phone.
United States: +1 (571) 317-3122
PT review sessions with at least ... -
Blind Review Group | PT 64 | Wednesday, August 10th | 8pm EST<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/1fyyDoO6lz6F2/giphy.gif" /> <h1>Wednesday, August 10th at 8PM ET: PT 64</h1> Click here to join this conv…
... , August 10th at 8PM ET: PT 64
Click here to join ... your phone.
United States +1 (571) 317-3112
Access ... />
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... -
Blind Review Group | PT 64 | Saturday, October 8 | 5 pm ESTI just realized I hadn't posted! Sorry! I hope everyone was able to pull up the calendar to see what's next! Better late than never? <h1>Saturday,…
... , October 8rd at 5PM ET: PT 64
Click here to join ... your phone.
United States +1 (571) 317-3112
Access ... />
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... -
Dec Study Group call #4 - 9/21/17 8:00 p.m. EST - PT 64 - submit questions beforehand!**Fourth call info:** 1. Take PT 64 and BR on your own before the call. 2. Submit 2-5 questions you want to review here: https://goo.gl/forms/T…
**Fourth call info:**
1. Take PT 64 and BR on your own ... -
June'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 64 | Tuesday, March 27th | 7:30 pm ESTJune'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 64 | Tuesday, March 27th | 7:30 pm EST https://media.giphy.com/media/WrGiAHYhZZYZ2/giphy.gif Thank You Vi…
June'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 64 | Tuesday, March 27th | 7:30 pm EST
https://media.giphy.com/media/WrGiAHYhZZYZ2/giphy.gif
Thank You Victoria for the gif to support the SG!!- @teamteamvicster -
PT64.S1.Q17 - The mosaics removed from Zeugma?I didn't understand the explanation for the right/wrong answer choices on this one at all. Can anyone help? I initially chose (C) on my PT and I stil…
... initially chose (C) on my PT and I still don't ... title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the ... /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-64-section-1-question-17/ -
New NA and SA difficultiesThe new NA and SA questions in PT 70 onward are killing me. I thought I had a strong grasp of them since I did well on almost all of them from PTs 52…
... yes! The questions were: PT 70, section 1, Q21. Section 4, Q. 20.
There ... -
New NA and SA difficultiesThe new NA and SA questions in PT 70 onward are killing me. I thought I had a strong grasp of them since I did well on almost all of them from PTs 52…
... yes! The questions were: PT 70, section 1, Q21. Section 4, Q. 20.
I ... -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT.
PT17.S2.Q11; PT22 ... -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT.
> PT17.S2.Q11 ... -
PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-69-section-1-question-14/ -
Preptest 69 - Section 1 - Question 14 ("forest fires")I had a hard time distinguishing the actual flawed reasoning here. I initially chose A because the logic matched perfectly, but changed my answer to …
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-69-section-1-question-14/ -
PT 34 Passage 1 Questions Video Problem@"Dillon A. Wright" Hey, I found a video that I couldn't get to play. https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-1-passage-1-questions
@"Dillon A. Wright"
Hey, I found a video that I couldn't get to play.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-1-passage-1-questions -
PT 79 section 1I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried.
I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried. -
PT63.S1.Q10 - ms. sandstrom's newspaper columnHi all, Blind reviewing the aforementioned Prep Test and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never have these kinds of very basic questio…
... and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never ... this problem sneaky.
1) "Thus, Ms. Sandstrom should pay ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-1-question-10/ -
PT36.S1.Q20 - editorialist: to ensure justice in the legal systemHey Everyone, So I'm currently drilling NA question types through the Cambridge packet things. I'm looking at question 20 in section 1 of PT 36, a…
... 'm looking at question 20 in section 1 of PT 36, and it says ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-36-section-1-question-20/ -
Examples of SA Questions w/ a Bi-Conditional?Hello 7Sagers, I’m going over my last PT— 65– and in section 1 Q 16, there’s a sufficient assumption question with a bi-conditional premise. I und…
... going over my last PT— 65– and in section 1 Q 16, there’s ... major time sink on the PT because I froze up. Can ... -
Subtle LR changes in PT 80+Hi everyone, I had been practicing with the LSAT official books (50s, 60s, 70s) and I recently purchased the 80s via 7sage. I noticed that in the …
June 2007 Prep Test Section 1 Q. 22/23Hi everyone, I finished my June 2007 prep test and am now doing the blind review, however, I am still having trouble with figuring out questions …
... and 23 in the first section. The questions are regarding the ...PT 80 LR S1 Blind Review: Friday May 8th, 8PM EasternHi Folks: In order to give the May Flex folks one last push to LSAT flex finish line I am hosting a blind review of PT 80, Section 1 (Logical Reas…
... hosting a blind review of PT 80, Section 1 (Logical Reasoning)
section but not having marked it ...Tonight RC review pt 63 passages 1/2Hey guys, If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews da…
Hey guys,
If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews daily. Please message if you'd like the link.
MadisonP47.S1.Q19 - When can you assume something is bad in contrast to the authorPT 47 Section 1 Question 19 In the stem it talks about a case of polio occurring due to the administration of a vaccine of 12 per year. By doing …
PT 47 Section 1 Question 19
In ... ISSUE
Some means 1 - infinite; if the some of ... "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"**
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-1 ...
