HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 68 | 348 | 406 |
| sec | 187 | 247 |
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.4K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 12 | 3.1K | 3.7K |
-
★ List of BR (Blind Review) groups<h1>Please note that as of July 6th, I am not updating this thread as much. There are far too many BR groups for me to keep track of. The newest BR g…
Yup!! PT 72 tonight. All at 7PM eastern.
Tues. PT 72
Wed. PT 71
Thurs. PT 68
Fri. PT 69
Sat. PT 64
Hope to see you there! -
What are you doing for your last Week?I thought this would be a cool way to outline our priorities and maybe exchange ideas on what to review/go over :D! -Last Week of LSAT Prep- -As …
Today: PT 73
Wed: review + PT 69 (+exp)
Thurs: review + PT 68 (+exp)
Friday: Review (reviewing stuff that I did poorly on)
Sat: Off
Sun: Review (only reviewing stuff that I did well on) -
PTs 70-74 for the final weekI've yet to take the 70-74 exams. Instead of squeezing in all five, I want to take and thoroughly BR 2-3 in the last week. Does anyone know if an…
@"Dr. Yamata" said:
but only get 11 wrong for a 170 on PT 73 and 74
-12*
I would recommending taking a PT you have done in the past for an ego booster but def take sunday off. -
Stupid idea but could it work???I've regressed back into my plateau range of high 150's low 160's. It's disappointing as I thought I had made progress and now I have around 15 of my…
I plan to take PT 68 tomorrow so I should be able to BR it with you guys on Friday... And I'm retaking these tests from around 1month ago so I really don't remember too many questions but I'm more cognizant of my thought process. -
Stupid idea but could it work???I've regressed back into my plateau range of high 150's low 160's. It's disappointing as I thought I had made progress and now I have around 15 of my…
... :
I plan to take PT 68 tomorrow so I should be ... -
Which 7Sage course should I take and how should I supplement it?Hi everyone. I took the June LSAT after taking an in-person Blueprint course. I did well but not as well as I wanted to or think I could. I've now pu…
... ready to focus 90% on PT's and BR, then ... then you need to PT; at least 2 per week with intensive ... you should get ahold of PT's ~36—75, and ... then upgrade if you want PT explanations).
Time ... whole hog and focus on PT'ing between now and October ... -
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
New one to the list
Pt 39, game 2 - Really punched me straight in the face.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-39-section-1-game-2/ -
Guidance Needed :(BLAH. I took prep test #62 today and had to stop when I couldn't complete the Logic Games section. I just couldn't move past it. That has never eve…
Yep, I had the same kind of trouble with PT 62, Game #2 -
PT35.S2.P4 - ronald dworkin argues that judges arehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/ I am a long-time lurker that is gearing up for the October exam. I really…
Following up on RC: PT 35, Section 2
My specific questions include ... -
there is no way the dinosaur game is one of the hardestthat game is cake compared to games with the super random, sneaky rules (like the television program one with 0.5 slots and whole slots, and you had …
PT 68 game 4 literally destroyed my confidence for three days -
there is no way the dinosaur game is one of the hardestthat game is cake compared to games with the super random, sneaky rules (like the television program one with 0.5 slots and whole slots, and you had …
If you had trouble on PT 68, Game 4 I just posted an explanation for it in the comments on that page last week. It got me through in under 7 minutes. -
Best advice for final 2 weeks?strategies for moving up a point or two/ maintaining mental health?
... out and relaxing. My PT average rose 2 or 3 points in ... -
Logical Reasoning Breaking 20QHelp!! Can't do more than 16 LR Q with 80% accuracy. Tips?? I want to touch 20
... . I often have 1 maybe 2 Q's at the end that ... -
Will the LSAT ever mention multiple flaws that could be true?Hello, Would the LSAT ever use the same flaw type that has subcategories in the same question? For example, would it ever have multiple answer choic…
PT 33 Sec 1 Q22 is a flaw - except question(each of the following accurately describes a flaw in the lawyers reasoning displayed above except).
I guess this would be an example of multiple flaws in a question. -
PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
@DumbHollywoodActor said:
This explanation requires far less assumptions (especially the difficult-to-swallow “The two options give COULD be the ONLY options”) than those previously mentioned.
This is not an assumption, it's ... -
PT48 and onHey guys, For a while now I have been working through the earlier PT's 21-38, concentrating on accuracy and applying the proper methodology to the…
In the past 5 years only PT 68 ranks as even having harder games by 7Sage's data. They just dress stuff up a little more, but even the games on October's test were really easy they just threw people off for one reason or another. -
February Test BR Groups, Week of Jan. 4th: Weds (PT68), Fri (PT A) Sun (PT69)Hey Feb Peeps! We got work to do! <img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lvrhzdqhsj1qbi3bk.gif" > </center> <h1>Wednesday, Jan. 6th at 8PM E…
@rockytoral said:
If anyone has PT.68 as a PDF and wouldn't mind emailing it to me
Probably not the best idea... -
How long did it take to master the fundamentals?Been going through the curriculum now for roughly 4 weeks. A lot of people want to know how long does it take to improve their score by X amount. S…
... . I pushed back my PT start date 2 times. For reference, at ... the whole pack, but probably 2/3 of it.
IMO ... -
Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... gotten wrong include: Principle: PT 54 Section 2 Q18 (answered A, correct ... answer was C), PT 54 Section ... answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 Q15 (answered B, correct ... -
Idea/Request for the site.Is there anyway we can add a grader to the problem set sections? This way after the course is completed I can view my overall percentage of where I m…
... sheet. Label one row PT X, S X, Q X (test, section ... -
The "Some People Say" Principle [title has been changed!]I have been studying logical reasoning stimuli that include a sentence about what someone OTHER than the author says, usually near the start of the p…
... only looked through the one PT I had open, so I ... are many more examples):
PT 68.S3Q5 "Some musicians claim they ... -
Advice Pls? avoiding burnout + settling my nervesOKAY. So. I'm taking in June; I've been studying for about a year and a half. I don't want to do so much over the next few weeks as to burnout, b…
... , if you take a PT and score 2 or 3 points below ... even take a PT each weak, up until 2 weeks before the ... -
BR ApproachHey team, Wanted some input on the optimum time to conduct a BR session. Do you find it more beneficial to BR an hour or two after you PT, or is i…
... I BR immediately after the PT. BRing while the material is ... BR right after taking a PT.
Here's what ... 1) Take PT then BR.
2) Use both PT and BR to ... those things for the next 2-3 days.
4) ... off at least once every 2 weeks.
... -
PT10.S4.Q21 - the proper way to plan a scientific projectI really don't like the way answer choice (E) is worded. It's too ambiguous and abstract that I was not able to wrap my head around it during timed c…
@"Sky is the Limit" said:
Can someone explain to me what (E) is even saying?
I think the real flaw is that there is an assumption that failing to have a "proper" plan for an endeavor means the endeavor should no longer ... -
PT74.S1.Q16 - debater: as a pedagogical practiceHi folks, I'm struggling with this question in BR. So I figured I'd post my reasoning and see what you all think of it. Debater: Premise 1:Be…
... as the LSAT (See PT 19 Section 2 Question 1 for a ... -
Relative OrderingI would like to ask this question. For relative ordering. Q - R- P - L l G - F Given the above, who is, could, should …
... that the "character" between Q and G is meant to ... some kind of connection between Q and G? But unless ... my computer) would signify Q before R before P before ... L AND Q before G before F
2.
Q--R-- ... , G before Q.
3.
Q--R--P--L ...
