I'm taking the test next June. The last 10 Actual packet ended at PT 71. This means that the next packet will be 72-81, with PT81 being the February 2016 test. Will LSAC release 72-81 in a new 10 Actual packet before June 2016? Thanks.
This was obviously a tough question, and after hours of tearing out my hair, I understand where the flaw is and why answer choice E is correct. Yet, there is still one component I am confused about.
Can someone please confirm that I have this chain correct? I became confused with the "cannot" in the first premise. Now I'm presuming "cannot" is modifying the sufficient clause since this premise includes "unless." Please correct me if I'm wrong. I was ...
I thought that this was an example of a part to whole fallacy. The author concludes that the decrease in revenue is exaggerated because part (parts and service companies) of the industry have succeeded even after admitting that manufacturers' share of the ...
... a say in the PT schedule and future meeting ... the 60s, 70s, and PT81. I want the group to ... etc; Come to each PT review sessions with at least ... />
1st Meeting then PT 60 on Saturday, July 1st ...
... difficult from the June '17 (PT81) test and want more practice ... that, you should check out PT 5's RC section. I ... a really similar way to PT81 with a similar distribution of ...
Hi everyone!
Can someone please help me with this question. I can't understand why C is wrong at all. I got it down to A and C and ended up picking C.
cant C be correct because if drinking one glass doesn't cause deficiency in vitamin D, ...
Really need some help here. I chose D and felt pretty strong about it and it turns out its B. I usually have an inkling on this but I don't see it at all. Thought it was statistical/actual issue.
Anyone want to share the timing sheets used for video footage? There is one with the live footage for PT81 but I would love to get a fresh blank one for myself. Thanks in advance!
So this question is easy enough when I take a moment to write out the logic. Even so, I'd like some advice on how to attempt this without enough time to parse out and write down the logic of each answer choice until I get to the right one. Unless the rule ...
... June 2, 7-9pm EST, PT 74
Sunday, June ... 9, 7-9pm EST, PT 76
Sunday, June ... June 23, 7-9pm EST, PT81
Sunday, June 30, ... July 7, 7-9pm EST, PT - TBD
Sunday, ... any suggestions?): PT 54 PT 56 PT 59
< ...
Can anybody help me with this question, because it is driving me crazy.
Why is B wrong? The stimulus clearly states "**any**given individual molecule of substance can activate..." how is this statement not supporting B?
And how can C be ...