... 68 section 3 of PT 68 is incorrect. Here ... A --> not C
Conclusion: C --> not B< ... as well as C and not C from the example ... C
Conclusion: C ---> no B
Swap C and no C ... with no B and C with no C (assumption #2):
... week, I took 3 recent PT and scored 166 on two ... />
1. Take 3 timed PT/BR this week (72, 77 ... />
2. Take 2 timed PT/BR this week (77 and ... of my time taking timed PT/BR or focusing on LG ...
Hi!
Will all the explanations for PT 79 be available on this website sometime this week (i.e. before December 3rd)? Unfortunately I missed the BR session with JY.
Thanks
... '17 Study Group | Blind Review PT 40 | Saturday, Dec 3rd | 5pm ... group later.
Current tentative PT schedule -- https://calendar.google.com ... :
* For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ...
... had this one down to C and D and ultimately went ... with C. I saw C an an alternate explanation ... but would C have been eliminated because the ... , I get that C is incorrect because C-> A&B ...