HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt03 | 0 | 0 |
| s2 | 1.1K | 1.6K |
| q20 | 209 | 229 |
-
PT37.S2.Q12 - one cannot prepare a good meal from bad foodI don't get the explanation for why A is right. All we know is that do produce a good meal you can't have bad food. That would seem to imply that you…
I don't get the explanation for why A is right. All we know is that do produce a good meal you can't have bad food. That would seem to imply that you could have a good meal with mediocre food. So how can you then take the the next conditional relationship ... -
PT37.S2.Q25 - in a car accident, air bags greatly reduceHi, I'm hoping my fellow 7Sagers could help clarify my muddled brain (I'm probably overthinking this). When a stimulus says something is more/les…
Hi, I'm hoping my fellow 7Sagers could help clarify my muddled brain (I'm probably overthinking this).
When a stimulus says something is more/less likely, I understand it's regarding a chance, but does it already take into account the total ... -
PT80.S2.Q18 (P3) - insider-trading lawCan someone break this down for me? I was torn between 2 different answer choices. I mean I can see how B is correct, but I also thought D had…
Can someone break this down for me?
I was torn between 2 different answer choices.
I mean I can see how B is correct, but I also thought D had merit. -
PT69.S4.Q20 - unusually large and intense forest firesHi All, This question gave me some issues during my timed take and BR. I'm hoping to talk through it and get someone else's perspective. We are…
Hi All,
This question gave me some issues during my timed take and BR. I'm hoping to talk through it and get someone else's perspective.
We are given a set of facts and we are asked which one of the ACs can be properly ... -
PT37.S2.Q12 - rosen: one cannot prepareOkay, I can't get logic for the life of me lol! **One cannot prepare a good meal** (GM) **from bad food** (/F), GM --> F (my answer. "/F" is …
Okay, I can't get logic for the life of me lol!
**One cannot prepare a good meal** (GM) **from bad food** (/F),
GM --> F (my answer. "/F" is negated because of the word "cannot").
GM --> Not /F (official ... -
PT2.S2.Q23 only question stem shownOnly question stem and all answer choices are shown. No stimulus.
Only question stem and all answer choices are shown. No stimulus. -
Does a correlation go both ways?Hi all, I have a question about correlations, as related to the LSAT. For example, PT77.S2.Q25 "The longer an animal can stay submerged in a dive,…
... the LSAT. For example, PT77.S2.Q25 "The longer an animal ... -
PT2.S2.Q19 - how do the airlines expect toI need some help with this question. I got the right answer but in Blind Review I changed the answer to a wrong choice. The right answer is D. I u…
I need some help with this question. I got the right answer but in Blind Review I changed the answer to a wrong choice. The right answer is D. I understand why that is right. The problem I have is trying to determine why A is wrong. Is it just that A ... -
PT8.S1.Q20 - principle that justifies both sides of argumentCan someone explain why B is correct for this question? I find this question confusing, mostly because the way the prompt asks for a principle that i…
Can someone explain why B is correct for this question? I find this question confusing, mostly because the way the prompt asks for a principle that if established will prove both sides of the argument correct.
To me B justifies the rehab ... -
Need Help with MSS v. Strengthen, v. Correlation/Causation StrengthenI am stuck on some of the MSS questions, Weaken, and the difference with how to tell MSS and Strengthen apart especially when C/C Strengthen is in pl…
... .
For example, PT 16, S2, Q21 was on a webinar ... -
PT50.S2.Q09 - one should always capitalizeHi 7sagers, I just recently solved the question referenced above, a MBT question with heavy conditional reasoning. I understand why TCR is what i…
Hi 7sagers,
I just recently solved the question referenced above, a MBT question with heavy conditional reasoning. I understand why TCR is what it is, but it took me WAY too long to solve this question. Even in hindsight/BR, I don't know ... -
PT54.S2.Q21 - most people who become migraine sufferers hi, can someone explain why answer choice e isnt a match? I'm still not 100% sure after BRing and watching the explination vid. https://7sage.com/l…
hi, can someone explain why answer choice e isnt a match? I'm still not 100% sure after BRing and watching the explination vid.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-54-section-2-question-21/ -
Principle or PSA?Principle or PSA question? ------------ In LR, I try to identify the question type as quickly as possible, but sometimes I cannot identify immediat…
... />
But for example, PT57.S2.Q1. says:
>_ ... />
=============================================
Is Q39.S2.Q11 a PSA question?
------------
Also, 7Sage labeled Q39.S2.Q11 as PSA, but I ... -
PT17.S2.Q21 - nuclear reactors are sometimes builtHi All, I could use some help with this necessary assumption question. I definitely see why C is a necessary assumption, but I'm having a hard tim…
Hi All,
I could use some help with this necessary assumption question. I definitely see why C is a necessary assumption, but I'm having a hard time figuring out why E is not also an equally necessary assumption. I have yet to find an ... -
PT28.S1.Q20 - Economy, Unemployment, InvestmentHi could someone help me out with the diagramming on this one? I found it absolutely confounding and I'm usually pretty decent at conditional phrasin…
Hi could someone help me out with the diagramming on this one? I found it absolutely confounding and I'm usually pretty decent at conditional phrasing.
So what I took away from this after looking at this thoroughly was that the original ... -
PT22.S2.Q25 - a recent survey showed thatHey, guys! Can you help me make sense of my reasoning for selecting this answer choice, if that makes sense?! Lol Ok so I chose D but I get why B …
Hey, guys! Can you help me make sense of my reasoning for selecting this answer choice, if that makes sense?! Lol
Ok so I chose D but I get why B is correct. I still don't know for certain that I wouldn't have the same thoughts that lead me ... -
PT17.S2.Q11 - because an elected official needsSo I chose answer choice A because author Q simply states, " ought to have been effective, but he has not been" the author is just saying that he's b…
So I chose answer choice A because author Q simply states, " ought to have been effective, but he has not been" the author is just saying that he's been ineffective but doesn't offer up any evidence as to why he is ineffective. Can someone explain to me ... -
PT23.S2.Q14 - kim: in northern europe during the 18th centuryHey everyone! I'm pretty confused about this question. Could anyone speak more on why (C) is incorrect? I chose it because I thought it was block…
Hey everyone!
I'm pretty confused about this question. Could anyone speak more on why (C) is incorrect? I chose it because I thought it was blocking out an alternative cause to the cited change in attitude: philosophers spreading their ... -
PT27.S2.Q15 - it is often said that beauty is subjectiveHey everyone! Could anyone shed some light as to the issues with (D)? I didn't select it because I had an eerie feeling about it, but even as I r…
Hey everyone!
Could anyone shed some light as to the issues with (D)? I didn't select it because I had an eerie feeling about it, but even as I read over it now I can't seem to put my finger on why it's incorrect. The more I read (D), the ... -
PT19.S2.Q24 - the united states ranks far behind countries such as swedenSo I chose D because I thought that the conclusion of the stimulus was that the US is behind in the sense that they should make these safety regulati…
So I chose D because I thought that the conclusion of the stimulus was that the US is behind in the sense that they should make these safety regulations a requirement not that they aren't actually safe because in the stimulus it says that they are all ... -
PT10.S2.G4Was wondering if someone could give me an explanation in there osn words https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-10-section-2-game-4/
Was wondering if someone could give me an explanation in there osn words
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-10-section-2-game-4/ -
PT37.S2.Q05 - although consciousness seems to arise from physical processesIm having some trouble with this question so I chose A because I thought that this is what was needed to make the conclusion valid and I didn't choos…
Im having some trouble with this question so I chose A because I thought that this is what was needed to make the conclusion valid and I didn't choose B because it says " must encompass MORE than " and I took the conclusion to mean that physical theories ... -
Parallel method of reasoning woesHey guys! I'm finding that I'm still having trouble really intuitively knowing when my job in Parallel Method of Reasoning q's is to mirror the lawg…
... of answer choice. (Ie. PT17.s2.q24 from Problem Set 3 ... -
PT20.S2.P4 (Q26) - in the dynamics of apocalypseHey everyone! Having a bit of difficulty with this passage. It's from the first RC problem set in the core curriculum. I was wondering if anyone coul…
Hey everyone! Having a bit of difficulty with this passage. It's from the first RC problem set in the core curriculum. I was wondering if anyone could add to JY's explanation for #26 and explain how (E) is supported? I chose (A), but I felt uneasy about ... -
PT13.S2.Q7 - It is not correct that people of the USHey, yall! Would you say that AC B equals ambiguity? Sometimes I get equivocation and ambiguity mixed up but I eliminated equivocation here because "…
Hey, yall! Would you say that AC B equals ambiguity? Sometimes I get equivocation and ambiguity mixed up but I eliminated equivocation here because "tax" isn't used differently throughout the passages. B basically says the author extended the meaning of ... -
PT June 2007.S2.Q22 - editorialist: news mediaSharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using…
Sharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using Lawgic as shorthand when you're not actually dealing with conditional statements.
Most ... -
PT68.S2.Q15 - psychologists recently conductedHi, I BR-ed this question, read the explanations from various websites and sources, and this question is still not making much sense to me. The …
Hi, I BR-ed this question, read the explanations from various websites and sources, and this question is still not making much sense to me.
The correct choice D has "probably" in it, which when negated is "not likely." Doesn't "not likely" ... -
"Mathy" Questions drilling?Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... - percent
PT02.S2.Q04 - average
PT02.S2.Q14 - average
PT02.S2.Q16-17 - percent ... -
PT15.S2.Q17 - Most people believe that yawningHi, I understand that answer choice D is correct, but I have been struggling for quite a bit on eliminating answer choice B. Can anyone explain wh…
Hi,
I understand that answer choice D is correct, but I have been struggling for quite a bit on eliminating answer choice B. Can anyone explain why this is incorrect?
When I was doing this question, I noticed two errors in ... -
PT9.S2.Q23 - a poor farmer was fond ofThe negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class?
The negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class?
