HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt06 | 0 | 0 |
| s3 | 910 | 1.3K |
| q25 | 144 | 165 |
-
PT5.S3.Q06 - whale's skeletonI had a hard time understanding why (A) is the right answer. After thinking about it for a day on and off, I came up with this reasoning. Please take…
I had a hard time understanding why (A) is the right answer. After thinking about it for a day on and off, I came up with this reasoning. Please take a look if my logic behind getting the right answer is correct.
I wonder if this this ... -
PT17.S3.Q20 - in order to succeedHi all, I am quite puzzled by the answer to this question altogether. The answer to this is answer choice A (circular reasoning of the first sente…
Hi all,
I am quite puzzled by the answer to this question altogether. The answer to this is answer choice A (circular reasoning of the first sentence and the last part of the last sentence following "because"), but I am not quite sure why ... -
PT17.S3.Q22 - on saturday melvin suggestedHi all! I had a question on answer choice E with this one. To me, the reasoning of flaw in answer choice E was the same as that of answer choice D…
Hi all!
I had a question on answer choice E with this one. To me, the reasoning of flaw in answer choice E was the same as that of answer choice D of the same PT same section question 20.
Looking at the explanation of ... -
PT31.S3.Q15 - ashley: words like "of" and "upon"<font color=red>Admin edit: Please review the 7Sage forum rules before posting again: https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/15/forum-rules > …
Admin edit: Please review the 7Sage forum rules before posting again:
https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/15/forum-rules
> 3. **Do not post** LSAT questions, any copyrighted content, or links to content that infringe on ... -
PT1.S3.Q4 - Military Deterrence PsychologyI understand why A, B, C and E are wrong, but I am not quite convinced that D is the right answer either. I would think that if a nation that see…
I understand why A, B, C and E are wrong, but I am not quite convinced that D is the right answer either.
I would think that if a nation that seeks deterrence and has unsurpassed military power as stated in (D), it would not be the interest ... -
Logic Games : [Never Together/Always Together] v. [Not Both] Rule ConfusionHello, During In-Out Games, I am consistently getting confused between the Not Both Rule and the Biconditional (Always Together/Never Together) R…
... />
For instance, in PT29 S3 Game 1, the second rule ... -
PT48.S3.Q14 - although the rights of native peoplesHey, guys. I think I got this one but I'm seeking clarification. I was between A, B and C and chose A. I think C is correct because a "property owner…
Hey, guys. I think I got this one but I'm seeking clarification. I was between A, B and C and chose A. I think C is correct because a "property owner" is defined in lines 15-21 and A and B are incorrect because they describe how one can obtain ownership. A ... -
PT17.S3.Q20 - morton: in order to succeedWhat does it mean when an answer choice, as is the case in PT17, Sec. 3, #20, Answer D, says, "Fails to consider the status..." of something? In …
What does it mean when an answer choice, as is the case in PT17, Sec. 3, #20, Answer D, says, "Fails to consider the status..." of something?
In other words, in this instance, what is the definition of "status"?
https://7sage.com/ ... -
PT52.S3.Q07 - gotera: infants lack the motor abilityCan someone explain how they were able to tease out the conditional elements in this stimulus? I'm having trouble seeing how the second sentence f…
Can someone explain how they were able to tease out the conditional elements in this stimulus?
I'm having trouble seeing how the second sentence fits into the conditional framework. It doesn't seem like it plays a role there.
... -
PT10.S3.Q01 (P1)- oil companies need offshoreHello guys, So I just completed the BR on this passage, and I am still tripped up on question 1. I understand why answer choice A is correct, …
Hello guys,
So I just completed the BR on this passage, and I am still tripped up on question 1.
I understand why answer choice A is correct, expect for the bit concerning "oil companies". Can someone point me to where this ... -
PT57.S3.Q15 - medical ethicist: assuming there isI do not understand why, "'it is never acceptable to offer experimental treatments to patients who experience no extreme symptoms of the the relevant…
I do not understand why, "'it is never acceptable to offer experimental treatments to patients who experience no extreme symptoms of the the relevant disease" is translated as no extreme symptoms (NES) -----> not acceptable to offer exp. treatment (/ ... -
PT63.S3.Q21 - Weed-killer datahttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-21/ I'm trying to understand this passage fully... I thought the data on the eff…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-21/
I'm trying to understand this passage fully...
I thought the data on the effects of the weed-killer would be misleading when it was drawn from studies of the ... -
PT33.S3.Q04 - limited research indicatesHello I have a question regarding the method of identifying an assumption. This is a strengthening question. Context: Therapeutic intervention be…
Hello I have a question regarding the method of identifying an assumption. This is a strengthening question.
Context: Therapeutic intervention before the occurrence of mental disorders can mitigate factors known as major contributor to them ... -
PT27.S3.P2 - personal names are generally regardedI have done this passage 3 times and have gotten 4 wrong every time. I was just wondering if anyone else has done this passage and has found the ques…
I have done this passage 3 times and have gotten 4 wrong every time. I was just wondering if anyone else has done this passage and has found the questions to just be too hard. I normally go -3 to -5 but dang I don't even know what happened here...
... -
PT55.S3.Q24 - it is popularly believed thatCan someone please confirm that I have this chain correct? I became confused with the "cannot" in the first premise. Now I'm presuming "cannot" is mo…
Can someone please confirm that I have this chain correct? I became confused with the "cannot" in the first premise. Now I'm presuming "cannot" is modifying the sufficient clause since this premise includes "unless." Please correct me if I'm wrong. I was ... -
PT40.S3.Q11 - historian: one traditional childrearing practiceThis question is strange -- the correct answer is not properly inferrable. Many child psychologists believe that the childrearing practice leads t…
This question is strange -- the correct answer is not properly inferrable.
Many child psychologists believe that the childrearing practice leads to lower self-esteem in children, which leads to those children having less confidence as adults ... -
PT21.S2.Q25 - statistician: changes in the sun's luminocityI got this wrong because while I did see the author was appealing to authority, I thought it was reasonable to assume that if the author says what an…
I got this wrong because while I did see the author was appealing to authority, I thought it was reasonable to assume that if the author says what an authority figure says, then it can be said that the author would say that too.
Answer ... -
PT24.S3.Q10 - all material bodies are divisibleI'm having trouble understanding the translation for the conditional logic to this question. `All material bodies are divisible into parts,` Ma…
I'm having trouble understanding the translation for the conditional logic to this question.
`All material bodies are divisible into parts,`
Material bodies --> Divisible
`and everything divisible is ... -
PT62.S4.Q25 - cities with healthy economiesHi. I'm not sure how to translate "those in search of jobs **should** move to a city with high-tech businesses" into lawgic. I thought the word "shou…
Hi. I'm not sure how to translate "those in search of jobs **should** move to a city with high-tech businesses" into lawgic. I thought the word "should" might be a necessary condition, but JY didn't put an arrow to connect JOBS and HIGH TECH. Whereas in ... -
PT37.S2.Q25 - in a car accident, air bags greatly reduceHi, I'm hoping my fellow 7Sagers could help clarify my muddled brain (I'm probably overthinking this). When a stimulus says something is more/les…
Hi, I'm hoping my fellow 7Sagers could help clarify my muddled brain (I'm probably overthinking this).
When a stimulus says something is more/less likely, I understand it's regarding a chance, but does it already take into account the total ... -
PT22.S3.Q24 - if g is assigned to team 1This guy JY shifts from a correct CBT answer choice to a MBT answer choice in the question straight after. I understand why some of the elements migh…
This guy JY shifts from a correct CBT answer choice to a MBT answer choice in the question straight after. I understand why some of the elements might be fixed in certain positions for the GLQ arrangement on Team 1 in Q23, but wouldn't you have to test all ... -
Does a correlation go both ways?Hi all, I have a question about correlations, as related to the LSAT. For example, PT77.S2.Q25 "The longer an animal can stay submerged in a dive,…
... LSAT. For example, PT77.S2.Q25 "The longer an animal can ... -
PT24.S3.Q11 - Special kinds of cotton that grow fibershttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-3-question-11/ When I was timing myself, this question took me almost 2 minutes because I coul…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-3-question-11/
When I was timing myself, this question took me almost 2 minutes because I couldn't choose the right answer choice. I think I was not understanding the first sentence ... -
PT38.S4.Q25 - one reason why european musicI am so confused by the video explanation on this one. At 1:27 the video says that an answer choice is "totally compatible to the statement above bec…
I am so confused by the video explanation on this one. At 1:27 the video says that an answer choice is "totally compatible to the statement above because they have nothing to do with each other"
===> WHAT??? Compatibility is not having ... -
PTA.S1.Q25 - in one-round sealed-bid auctionsCould someone help me shed some light on why the correct answer is correct? The passage refers to "such protection", as protection for the sellers (t…
Could someone help me shed some light on why the correct answer is correct? The passage refers to "such protection", as protection for the sellers (to not have to sell to a buyer who bids extremely low), but the correct answer (E), doesn't seem to be ... -
PT6.S3.Q24 - rumored declines in automobileI thought that this was an example of a part to whole fallacy. The author concludes that the decrease in revenue is exaggerated because part (parts a…
I thought that this was an example of a part to whole fallacy. The author concludes that the decrease in revenue is exaggerated because part (parts and service companies) of the industry have succeeded even after admitting that manufacturers' share of the ... -
PT64.S3.Q09 - in some jurisdictions, lawmakersI chose D because all the other answers weren't strengthening the argument and the answer is A but the reason why I didn't pick it was because it say…
I chose D because all the other answers weren't strengthening the argument and the answer is A but the reason why I didn't pick it was because it says " that are proportional to the harm they BELIEVE to result from those crimes". We're not talking about ... -
PT22.S2.Q25 - a recent survey showed thatHey, guys! Can you help me make sense of my reasoning for selecting this answer choice, if that makes sense?! Lol Ok so I chose D but I get why B …
Hey, guys! Can you help me make sense of my reasoning for selecting this answer choice, if that makes sense?! Lol
Ok so I chose D but I get why B is correct. I still don't know for certain that I wouldn't have the same thoughts that lead me ... -
PT28.S3.Q08 - some environmentalists questionMy big issue with this question is about why B is the correct answer. It seems to equate "exploiting" with "destroy" and I'm not sure how reasonable …
My big issue with this question is about why B is the correct answer. It seems to equate "exploiting" with "destroy" and I'm not sure how reasonable of an assumption that is to make. Since this is a logically inferred question, I assumed that the right ...
