I've been looking at this question for the last 20 minutes, watched the JY's explanation, and looked through the comments. Still have no idea what is going on. Can someone help explain it to me?
I don't really understand answer choice A) if there is no overwhelming evidence for or against a hypo. then one should "suspend judgment as to its truth". What does it mean by "as to its truth"? Anyone could help?
I found this to be an incredibly difficult question. I did get the question right, but I did not feel good at all about my answer choice timed or in blind review. I eliminated the other answer choices because they just ...
Although I was able to get the right answer, I am not sure if my identification of the main conclusion was correct. Can anybody help me with this, please. Thank you in advance!!
... />
For LR:
First Q of my first LR (25 ... />
For the 26 LR, first Q was on blood transfusions and ... of the one stimulus, two Q's.
For my last ... LR (25) the first Q was on the mayor's ...
I am retaking this PT and I **really** struggled with this passage. In particular, I have trouble understanding the difference between studies being debunked vs. studies giving two opposing facts. ...
I am having such a tough time on this question. I have written out my thinking, watched the explanation a few times and I am still stumped by this question. Answer C is ...
... be funneled into the last Q for a final comprehensive test ... replaced rule, knowing the SE Q is coming, and having the ... as you work through the Q's, might be very helpful ...
... following:
5 condominiums R Q S T V each has ... , H, M.
Rules: Q has fewer features than S ... feature in common
Both Q and V have hardwood floors ...
Can someone please explain the difference between the “question difficulty” scale and the “psg/game/s difficulty” scale in the CC problem set answers/explanations section for LR Q’s?
I find this strengthening question particularly tricky. Can anyone help explain why E) is the correct answer? Also explaining why C) isn't would be helpful!
In this question why do we "attack" the premise. I thought we don't really try to attack the premise but in this question it does. How often does this type of question show up on the LSAT? I understand this question just a little bit but I am unsure why ...
what's the difference between any given molecule of substance and molecule of any substance in this case.... substance is really broad... not like they said substance 'X' or something.
Hi- I have been focusing on NA questions, and was looking for quick ways to identify answers. I had some trouble differentiating between (B) and (E). The right answer is B. My question is---- Will the answer in Necessary Assumption Questions follow the ...