This question kinda had me befuddled in my initial PT and my blind review, and still I am struggling to understand the question after both. Any chance someone has a better idea of how we can arrive at the answer being C using the question stimulus?
... particularly daunting example: PT 27 Section4Question 14. What I recommend ... bringing into this question is this basic framework:< ... ** monthly income after taxes and 10% of my **_brother's_** ... here? The answer to that question is one of the ** ...
Here is a _very_ partial list of correlation-causation flaws:
PT20.S1.Q10 (★★★), PT20.S4.Q14 (★★★), PT30.S2.Q25 (★★★★), PT31.S2.Q9 (★★★★), PT64.S1.Q5 (★), PT65.S1.Q8 (★), PT66.S4.Q25(★★★)
> @akistotle said:
> I once tried to make a list of all the common flaws.....But then I gave up. :sweat: So here is a partial list:
>
> **5) Causation confusions (correlation-causation flaws)**
> PT20.S1.Q10; ...
... I could have got this question. It is a most strengthen ... question and I feel the answer ... about this question?
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-23/
... ran across a question in particular (LSAT 58, Section4, Question 21) regarding lottery ... to it: will an Assumption Question answer choice ever feature a ... more detailed eye? Hope this question makes sense, and I look ...