HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt10 | 55 | 56 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
| q19 | 225 | 238 |
-
The Blind Review Group: PT43 Skype BR, Saturday 3/28 7pm ETHello friends. A number of us ( h/t @emli1000 ) gather via Skype voice chat on Saturday's at 4pm PT/5pm MT/6pm CT/7pm ET for group Blind Review. …
... /> @nicole.hopkins I already took PT10 and 3 recently and need ... -
Weekly Goal-Setting & Accountability ThreadHi everyone, I'm taking somewhat of an LSAT hiatus for March (school, it happens) but I'm going to start a goal-setting/accountability thread here…
... /> THIS WEEK:
1) Review PT10
2) Drill LR weaknesses ... -
Videos of Sages doing LSATsI just saw that there was a new video that showed a very good student working through an LSAT logic game in real time, with JY providing color commen…
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
Pt 15 - S4 - Game 2 (Country of Zendu)< ... lawgic
Pt 6 - S4 - Game 4 (Network of Bridges ... lines
Pt 6- S4- Game 3 (eight benches)
LawgicI've decided to take a break from PTs, and go back over the basics. I think one of my weaknesses is taking the Lawgic that we were taught, and apply…
... benefit. For example, PT59, S2, Q19 I diagrammed the short stimulus ...LawgicI've decided to take a break from PTs, and go back over the basics. I think one of my weaknesses is taking the Lawgic that we were taught, and apply…
@c.janson35 said:
Used sparingly I think diagramming can be of great benefit.
Yesh :)
@c.janson35 said:
PT59, S2, Q19
This question was VERY satisfying :DSkippity Skip SkipWho here has developed a system for skipping questions? What type of criterion does it/must it fulfill for you to justify a skip? Any and all insight…
... run? PF or PR in Q19 when you've got 7 ...Does "A causes B" equal to A -->B?Hi, guys, I am confused with the relationship between "causation" and conditional logic. Could anyone give me some help? According to the lessons, it…
... -->B. However, in PT25-S4-Q12, this rule does not ...Causation LogicCan you conclude from A cause B cause C that A cause C?
Yup, PT65,S4,Q6 is a good example of this. You may think of this in real life as a sort of "indirect cause", but it's causation nonetheless.
