Hi, everyone, for question #12, why the cultural conservatism is EXEMPLIFIED by uncritical attitude ? Because the two concepts lie in two pragraphs, and I don’t see a ...
Hi! I am having difficulty with predicting descriptive flaw questions. If anyone has done this question can you please explain to me how the correct answer is D.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-4-question-12/
Im having trouble understanding why B is the correct answer. I read over the stimulus several times over, but for some reason could not figure it out. I was hoping I could receive ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-4-question-12/
This was confusing! Adults in Country X consume an increasing amount of fat as they grow older, but the percentage of fat in their diet stays the same throughout adult life. Initially ...
Hey guys I have a question about this question beginning with, "it is clear that none of the volleyball players at yesterday's office."
Is A incorrect because goes from making a statement about all the employees at TRF who were offered the insurance ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-4-question-12/
Hi, I am struggling between B and C...
I thought B is wrong because they might be able to get water from other regions if they run out their water...
Why are we not ...
I'm really having trouble with this question. Am I supposed to approach it as a sufficient assumption question though it's a flaw question? Thanks in advance!
Good lord, I find this question frustrating and I cannot for the life of me determine how any single one of these answers could be seen as satisfactory.
This is the question where West says that Haynes is the worst inspector. I honestly ...
Even though this question is old, it has several lessons built into it. I was able to parse this question out mainly because of the lessons on 7Sage. The first lesson I see with this question is the importance of being attuned to the grammar of the LSAT ...
A great grouping game with conditional logic, but I am having some trouble...
I am having trouble understanding how to link up the new condition in this question. I understand what JY is saying in the explanation video and it makes sense but ...
Are we supposed to assume that these chemicals are initially "harmless" or that the dilution process caused them to become harmless? There is nothing in the passage discussing whether or not the chemicals are harmless.
Can anyone giveme a hand with this question?
PREMISE:
Studies suggest that no matter what type of short term therapy one receives one will have a similar amount of improvement
CONCLUSION:
Therefore, it must be that ...
Having serious problems with figuring out this question. E is the right answer, but I chose B. My thinking for B is that it may have been a coincidence that all three times Monroe had eaten at Tip-Top, was already ill beforehand but ...
Hey guys. I’m hoping some of you LSAT masters can help with this question. I’ve been trying to wrap my brain around it for the past few days with no luck. I understand it is a correlation/ causation flaw, but I can’t seem to understand why D is the AC and ...
I want to know why answer E is wrong. In Manhattan Prep. It says "everyday food" is irrelevent to the question. However, couldnt water be part of everyday food? Is this also making assumptions?
I'm having trouble figuring out why A is a wrong answer choice.
If we apply the negation test to AC A, it will say -- "All of the scents that have a tendency to reduce susceptibility to illness do NOT do so by reducing stress."
Hi all -- this question just has me stumped altogether. I would really appreciate it if someone could walk me through their thought process! In particular, if there are also tips on how to get through this kind of question faster (it's so fuzzy because it' ...
I have been reading through some of the previous posts regarding this question, and they have really helped me understand the stimulus and why it is wrong. Basically, the author gave us the following premise:
Hi, would really appreciate any thoughts on this question. My understanding of the stimulus is as follows:
Support NT --> /chance of elect.
Und E -->/support NT
Conclusion: Und E --> Chance of elect.
I’ve spent 40mins on this question. Can someone please help me to see if I’m making sense. At this point, I’m googling everyday vocabulary I come across in LSAT cuz this test will make you question your understanding of words you use everyday. The whole ...