When writing out the conditional logic for the reporter, I initially got /C--> /M but when I went back to review I got C---> M. In other words, because of the if I kept ...
I had this down to B or D during the timed exam, and I can't figure out what is technically wrong with B. In my mind, it's as close to a sufficient assumption as D is.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-3-question-15/
Hey, could anyone please help me understand how answer choice B does not weaken the argument? if there were more people with more than 6 months treatment responding then the ...
Hi!
Though I watched JY's video explanation on this question,
I cannot still figure out what is a significant difference between an answer choice (A) and (C).
I thought "cultural relationships" in (A) can entail the meaning of how ...
I watched the video explanation for this, but I don't think I understood it 100%.
I think the author's logic is simplified as farther=brighter=younger but I don't quite understand how a brighter star is supposed to be younger. Is this ...
I'm not sure why 1) negating morally right to mean morally wrong is incorrect and 2) negating right to mean wrong is incorrect. Please explain!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-23
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-59-section-2-question-21
Struggling so hard with why C is right and E is wrong. I didn't like either answer choice but under time pressure, chose E because thought C was challenging the premise. I've watched ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-2-question-21
We are told that Sugared beverages can be helpful in avoiding dehydration AND sugared beverages can delay muscle fatigue.
Can some of you awesome people weigh in on statistical reasoning as it's used in the LSAT? For example, PT 18 S2 Q4. Specifically, things like probability or likelihood trip me up. Any resources or explanations would be appreciated! Thanks!
I have been analyzing all the June 2007 (public domain) questions one by one, and find that they all neatly fit into very neat symbolic argument patterns--except for Section II Question 24. I would appreciate any comments on this particular question, ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-2-question-12/
Hey 7Sagers, I just did this question and did almost everything right, but ultimately chose (E). I understood there to be 2 gaps,the first between: ~being able to tell ulterior ...
Hi there,
I am so confused about this problem and have no idea about whats it talking about.
What does "This fact gives the traditional attribution of a disputed painting special weight" mean and how do we strengthen the opposite of it? ...
I'm reviewing why I struggled more than I should've on game 3, and JY labeled the in/out differently than I did. He labels "finance" as out and "incentives" as in. I switched mine around and while I was still able to solve the game, I struggled more than I ...
Anyone have any luck with this one? I don't understand how there's support for no reliable protections, when the only protections discussed in the passage are very specific legal protections.
Thanks!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-08/
For this particular question, I'm having trouble understanding why answer choice E is incorrect. Because we know that the batteries that power electric cars come from nuclear ...
Since we had a great discussion on an El Nino question last time, I thought I’d look it up and learn more about it. Really interesting weather phenomenon actually, so thought I’d share what I found:
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-2-question-22/
I'm having a difficulty accepting D as an answer for this question. Hoping someone can help!
My issue with this answer choice is that it seems to create a further ...
I understand that E is the correct answer choice, but since this is a sufficient assumption question, isn't E describing a necessary condition? Isn't it too strong? It says New subway cars are REQUIRED. But they're not required. They're sufficient to cause ...