http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-26-section-2-question-20/
Can anyone explain this question to me? If you could first point out and explain what the flaw in the stimulus is and then match that against the correct answer, I would greatly ...
I found this question especially tricky because of what I perceive to be a logic gap in the stimulus. The critics argument can be boiled down to (Justified public funding) -& ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-08/
Can anyone please explain why the correct answer is (E)? I am confused with the part in (E) saying: "if they are weaponry..."
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-2-question-20/
Hello guys, this MBT question actually comes from the MBT course video. Most people have the question about the last sentence "even its critics acknowledge." I have read all the ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-23/
I'm having trouble translating the "not until" statement. Until is "negate sufficient" but the "not" cancels the negation from the until rule so then it reads just like an if then. Is ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-2-question-20/
B is the answer, and the only reason I did not choose it is because it required me to make an assumption that 1. Plankton are not fish (which would require some background knowledge ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-02/
Could anyone explain why the answer is C- All lawyers are cattle ranchers and not A- Some lawyers are cattle ranchers.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-04/
I got this question right, but not perfectly clear why (D) is correct.
Could you elaborate the answer choice (D) - why is it a clear-cut answer?
I think I misinterpretted "addressing" in option A to mean that "referring to the..." Instead, by "address" I now think he means "considering and potentially implementing the critics claims doesn't matter yet cause now ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-22/
Hi there, I found the correct answer choice makes sense. But I chose A when I first do this question. I think A also explain the conflict by point out the possibility that: maybe ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-20/
Can someone break this down? I thought B was the least attractive answer, and it turned out to be correct. I am completely clueless on this one; I can't even make heads or tails of ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-2-question-20/
I got this one correct by POE, but I am having a lot of trouble explicitly understanding why E is correct (I was wishy washy with A, but I get why it's wrong). Here is my analysis:< ...
Oxygen.18 is a heavier-than-normal isotope of oxygen. In a rain cloud, water molecules containing oxygen-18 are rarer than water molecules containing normal oxygen. But in rainfall, a higher proportion of all ...
I am still confused why the conclusion is adequate productivity --> high- tech technology. I negated the high tech technology part because of the "not" present in the sentence. I tried reviewing my notes and I can't find where he explains in the ...
Hi everyone! If anyone has some better insight as to why (E) is the correct answer I would greatly appreciate it! I see why (E) would be the right answer but I also believe (C) could be a correct answer. The only issue with (C) that I do see is possibly ...
I watched the video explanation for this, but I don't think I understood it 100%.
I think the author's logic is simplified as farther=brighter=younger but I don't quite understand how a brighter star is supposed to be younger. Is this ...