HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt23 | 53 | 65 |
| s3 | 910 | 1.3K |
| q10 | 125 | 136 |
-
PT1.S3.Q04 - The theory of military deterrence...I picked C for both during the timed run and blind review. I read from another post that C is wrong because it's mixing up the sufficiency and nec…
I picked C for both during the timed run and blind review.
I read from another post that C is wrong because it's mixing up the sufficiency and necessity condition but I'm still not seeing that this is the case.
In the last ... -
PT1-S3-Q22- The 1980s have been characterizedThis question proved to be incredibly challenging for me. Could someone please define how the argument used two different uses of the term "selfish?"…
This question proved to be incredibly challenging for me. Could someone please define how the argument used two different uses of the term "selfish?" Thanks in advance! -
PT81.S3.Q21-- evolution does not always optimizeHi, Like many others, I was stuck between A and C here. However, while I do understand JY's explanation that a "claim" does not need support whil…
Hi,
Like many others, I was stuck between A and C here. However, while I do understand JY's explanation that a "claim" does not need support while an "argument" does, I thought A was correct here because the second sentence of the stimulus ... -
PT24.S3.Q23I don't understand how B is correct. It states that "a piece of narrow floorboard was NOT SIGNIFICANTLY LESS EXPENSIVE than a piece of wide floorboar…
I don't understand how B is correct. It states that "a piece of narrow floorboard was NOT SIGNIFICANTLY LESS EXPENSIVE than a piece of wide floorboard'." However, how does that translate to narrow boards being more expensive--which I believe would make ... -
PTC2-S3-Q18 Education critics' contention thatHi, I have trouble understanding answer choice B. What is it like to be ambiguous in an LR stimulus? When I was doing this question under timed, I…
Hi,
I have trouble understanding answer choice B. What is it like to be ambiguous in an LR stimulus? When I was doing this question under timed, I thought ambiguous notion of knowledge was the author does not state whether her example of ... -
PT89.S3.Q25-- Whorfian hypothesisHi, So while I did understand why the wrong answer choices were wrong here, I had trouble understanding why E was right. Can anyone explain their…
Hi,
So while I did understand why the wrong answer choices were wrong here, I had trouble understanding why E was right. Can anyone explain their reasoning here?
The reason I had trouble understanding why E was right was ... -
PT21-S3-Q6- Books about architectural worksI noticed that for this question we are being presented with a principle in the stimulus. The principle used conditional logic: Intended General A…
I noticed that for this question we are being presented with a principle in the stimulus. The principle used conditional logic:
Intended General Audience ------> book has to discuss aesthetics and utility
In order for the ... -
Question from LRplease go over PT1 S3 Q12
please go over PT1 S3 Q12 -
PT17.S2.Q10- "the apples sold in this cafeteria"I am really struggling to understand why B is incorrect. Would greatly appreciate someone's insight.
I am really struggling to understand why B is incorrect. Would greatly appreciate someone's insight. -
Can someone explain PT1.S3.Q23 and PT1.S4.Q8On Q23: I almost picked C then changed it to E. (answer is C) On 8: I have no idea.. (answer is C)
On Q23: I almost picked C then changed it to E. (answer is C)
On 8: I have no idea.. (answer is C) -
PT5.S3.Q19 Dr.Schilling vs Dr.Laforte What is counterexample?! Help!sch. c=.. fail to consider the human costs that consumers pay in nationalized insurance p- high tech medicine is restricted p2- transplants are ra…
sch.
c=.. fail to consider the human costs that consumers pay in nationalized insurance
p- high tech medicine is restricted
p2- transplants are rationed
p3- people are denied treatments they want and need
-
laf.
PT1-S3-Q18- "In the United States proven oil..."I interpreted "D" as saying that new fields had been found since "oil that is considered unextractable is now considered extractible." For "D" to be …
I interpreted "D" as saying that new fields had been found since "oil that is considered unextractable is now considered extractible." For "D" to be correct, I thought we had to make the assumption that the shift between unextractable to extractible was ...PT1.S3.Q18 - United States proven oil reservesSo I just need clarification over why answer choice E is correct. 1. "amount of oil considered extractable is THE SAME as they were 10 years ago."…
So I just need clarification over why answer choice E is correct.
1. "amount of oil considered extractable is THE SAME as they were 10 years ago."
2. Annual consumption of domestically produced oil increased.
Reconcile ...PT2.S4.Q10- "Even if crime has been committed...."For answer choice A, I seemed to struggle understanding how it strengthens the argument. Is answer choice A saying that the more "good" cases that yo…
For answer choice A, I seemed to struggle understanding how it strengthens the argument. Is answer choice A saying that the more "good" cases that you have, the higher your productivity score at your firm (I am assuming that a high productivity score is a ...May Flex 2020.S3.Q22&Q24This section alone has four weaken questions!!! I don't think i've ever had a section with so many flaw and weaken questions together... anyway, sinc…
This section alone has four weaken questions!!! I don't think i've ever had a section with so many flaw and weaken questions together... anyway, since JY's explanation videos are not available yet, I want to put these confusing ones out here for discussion ...PT43.S3.Q24I get why B is correct but it's impossible to eliminate D. What am I missing here? Let’s imagine we have 4 graduates, Eva, John, Jerome, and Henry…
I get why B is correct but it's impossible to eliminate D. What am I missing here?
Let’s imagine we have 4 graduates, Eva, John, Jerome, and Henry- Our only graduates across the country.
Premise 1: While only Eva and John ...PT5.S3.Q15Please help explain this question.
Please help explain this question.PT59.S3.Q19Okay so in this one I chose AC A at first glance, but after spending 20 minutes trying to understand why A is wrong I think I've finally got it. _…
Okay so in this one I chose AC A at first glance, but after spending 20 minutes trying to understand why A is wrong I think I've finally got it.
_A) Some babies utter individual words that they do not understand_
I understand ...PT M20Was anyone able to finish the LR section from question 11 onward? it was blank for me after Q10
Was anyone able to finish the LR section from question 11 onward? it was blank for me after Q10PT40.S1.Q10 - Environmental CleanupI couldn't see how the term "normal" was used differently between the two speakers? Would someone be able to clarify how to focus on that? I complete…
I couldn't see how the term "normal" was used differently between the two speakers? Would someone be able to clarify how to focus on that? I completely brushed over that.
**Admin Note:** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-40-section-1- ...PT6.S3.Q17 - Carbon-dating procedureIt took me 20 min, and I still could not find the right answer, so I just left it. I was stuck between A, D, and E. Any help? Thanks 7Sage.
It took me 20 min, and I still could not find the right answer, so I just left it. I was stuck between A, D, and E. Any help? Thanks 7Sage.PTB.S3.Q14 - Rationale for punishing criminalsIf you have done this passage and got Q14 right, would you mind explaining your thought process? The passage says "the second rationale is that a pun…
If you have done this passage and got Q14 right, would you mind explaining your thought process? The passage says "the second rationale is that a punishment is justified by severity of a crime." This leads me to interpret that the consequence (severity) of ...PT M20.S3.Q12 - Effective check on grass and bush firesHi! I don't really understand why B is wrong even after reading numerous explanations. If areas subject to **more fires** (which is true when the lev…
Hi! I don't really understand why B is wrong even after reading numerous explanations. If areas subject to **more fires** (which is true when the level of rainfall drops below normal for an extended period of time like in a drought) tend to be **less ...PT4.S1.Q10 - Artificial fertilizersCould someone explain this question to me please?
Could someone explain this question to me please?PTC.S3.Q9 - Recent poll of Chief Executive OfficersI was able to narrow it down to B and D, but I am struggling to figure out why B is wrong?
I was able to narrow it down to B and D, but I am struggling to figure out why B is wrong?PT5.S3.Q19 - Privatized health care versus Medicare for AllCould someone explain exactly what L is doing in response to S's argument? I thought both were interpreting access in different ways, for S it was ab…
Could someone explain exactly what L is doing in response to S's argument? I thought both were interpreting access in different ways, for S it was about access to high tech care and for L it was about access to basic healthcare. I just feel that there is ...PT6.S3.Q03 - Predator insectsCan anyone explain exactly why D is the answer. I kind of get it, but just need a brief reason why it is most definitely the answer as opposed to an…
Can anyone explain exactly why D is the answer. I kind of get it, but just need a brief reason why it is most definitely the answer as opposed to any of the others. Like what makes it stand out the most?
