http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-2-question-17/
This question was very confusing to me because I couldn't understand what assumption they could possibly be making.
I originally chose E. On BR, I chose E again. I ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-2-question-02/
Does anyone know why the answer is C? I was stuck between E and C but I still don't quite understand how to distinguish why C is the correct answer.
Can some of you awesome people weigh in on statistical reasoning as it's used in the LSAT? For example, PT 18 S2Q4. Specifically, things like probability or likelihood trip me up. Any resources or explanations would be appreciated! Thanks!
I'm quite confused on this question. I was down to answer choice A and E, and ultimately chose A. I understand why E is correct, but I still cannot grasp why A is not.
I thought that the stimulus could be viewed in relations to not only " ...
Alright, I'm not sure if I should be worried about this question too much as I hope (and have heard) that the newer tests are much more logically rigorous. Anyway, hear me out on this one...
Hi, I am having trouble understanding why (B) MBT. I understand why the other answer choices are bad. But I have no idea why (B) is the correct answer. It seems to me that (B) CBT -- not MBT.
I am still quite confused about why answer choice D is wrong here. After all, couldn't it be argued that P is proposing a hypothesis (that M's hypothesis is laughable) and showing that it is merely possible (by stating that it ...
I wanna discuss about P's reasoning method; especially how does P from M's words make this inference: "no one else could read them, according to your hypothesis."
is there any part in M's reasoning can P infer that people not knowing the ...
Does the question stem "The passage is structured to lead to which one of the following conclusions?" constitute a hybrid Main Point/ MBT question? Or, is this more of a MSS type question?
First of all, the conclusion. There are no conclusion indicators and I was confused between 2 statements to select for the conclusion. Secondly, answer choice (A) and (C), aren't they basically both saying the same ...
I am really struggling with reading this chain. I was under the understanding that two "some" statements lead to an invalid argument, so I didn't think we could make a Must Be True statement. How do you read the chain to get to the correct AC?
... .S4.Q21(★★★); PT23.S2.Q19(★★★★); PT23.S3.Q17(★★); PT24.S2.Q23 (★★★★); PT30.S4 ... .Q25 (★★★★★); PT64.S1.Q24 (★★★★); PT67.S2.Q09 (★★); PT68.S3.Q21 (★★★★★); PT79 ... now but something like PT30.S2.Q25 (★★★★) may be a good ...