HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt28 | 39 | 42 |
| s3 | 910 | 1.3K |
| q23 | 198 | 217 |
-
(Theory question) Why do you negate a conditional by negating the necessary?Specifically, I am looking at PT 68.S2.Q23, the second sentence: "We must therefore reject Tolstoy's rash claim that if we knew a lot about the event…
... looking at PT 68.S2.Q23, the second sentence: "We must ... -
PT48.S3.Q14 - although the rights of native peoplesHey, guys. I think I got this one but I'm seeking clarification. I was between A, B and C and chose A. I think C is correct because a "property owner…
Hey, guys. I think I got this one but I'm seeking clarification. I was between A, B and C and chose A. I think C is correct because a "property owner" is defined in lines 15-21 and A and B are incorrect because they describe how one can obtain ownership. A ... -
PT17.S3.Q20 - morton: in order to succeedWhat does it mean when an answer choice, as is the case in PT17, Sec. 3, #20, Answer D, says, "Fails to consider the status..." of something? In …
What does it mean when an answer choice, as is the case in PT17, Sec. 3, #20, Answer D, says, "Fails to consider the status..." of something?
In other words, in this instance, what is the definition of "status"?
https://7sage.com/ ... -
PT52.S3.Q07 - gotera: infants lack the motor abilityCan someone explain how they were able to tease out the conditional elements in this stimulus? I'm having trouble seeing how the second sentence f…
Can someone explain how they were able to tease out the conditional elements in this stimulus?
I'm having trouble seeing how the second sentence fits into the conditional framework. It doesn't seem like it plays a role there.
... -
PT10.S3.Q01 (P1)- oil companies need offshoreHello guys, So I just completed the BR on this passage, and I am still tripped up on question 1. I understand why answer choice A is correct, …
Hello guys,
So I just completed the BR on this passage, and I am still tripped up on question 1.
I understand why answer choice A is correct, expect for the bit concerning "oil companies". Can someone point me to where this ... -
PT57.S3.Q15 - medical ethicist: assuming there isI do not understand why, "'it is never acceptable to offer experimental treatments to patients who experience no extreme symptoms of the the relevant…
I do not understand why, "'it is never acceptable to offer experimental treatments to patients who experience no extreme symptoms of the the relevant disease" is translated as no extreme symptoms (NES) -----> not acceptable to offer exp. treatment (/ ... -
PT63.S3.Q21 - Weed-killer datahttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-21/ I'm trying to understand this passage fully... I thought the data on the eff…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-21/
I'm trying to understand this passage fully...
I thought the data on the effects of the weed-killer would be misleading when it was drawn from studies of the ... -
PT33.S3.Q04 - limited research indicatesHello I have a question regarding the method of identifying an assumption. This is a strengthening question. Context: Therapeutic intervention be…
Hello I have a question regarding the method of identifying an assumption. This is a strengthening question.
Context: Therapeutic intervention before the occurrence of mental disorders can mitigate factors known as major contributor to them ... -
PT27.S3.P2 - personal names are generally regardedI have done this passage 3 times and have gotten 4 wrong every time. I was just wondering if anyone else has done this passage and has found the ques…
I have done this passage 3 times and have gotten 4 wrong every time. I was just wondering if anyone else has done this passage and has found the questions to just be too hard. I normally go -3 to -5 but dang I don't even know what happened here...
... -
Embedded conditional OR referential phrase?Hi all, Having trouble understanding when there is an embedded conditional (or, the LSAT wants us to view it as such) or a referential phrase that…
... a specific example: PT70.S1.Q23
"Columnist: Although most ... -
PT55.S3.Q24 - it is popularly believed thatCan someone please confirm that I have this chain correct? I became confused with the "cannot" in the first premise. Now I'm presuming "cannot" is mo…
Can someone please confirm that I have this chain correct? I became confused with the "cannot" in the first premise. Now I'm presuming "cannot" is modifying the sufficient clause since this premise includes "unless." Please correct me if I'm wrong. I was ... -
PT40.S3.Q11 - historian: one traditional childrearing practiceThis question is strange -- the correct answer is not properly inferrable. Many child psychologists believe that the childrearing practice leads t…
This question is strange -- the correct answer is not properly inferrable.
Many child psychologists believe that the childrearing practice leads to lower self-esteem in children, which leads to those children having less confidence as adults ... -
PT9.S2.Q23 - a poor farmer was fond ofSo I got this one wrong and picked C when A is the correct AC. It's just not clicking for me how this is correct. Any help would be greatly appreciat…
So I got this one wrong and picked C when A is the correct AC. It's just not clicking for me how this is correct. Any help would be greatly appreciated! -
PT24.S3.Q10 - all material bodies are divisibleI'm having trouble understanding the translation for the conditional logic to this question. `All material bodies are divisible into parts,` Ma…
I'm having trouble understanding the translation for the conditional logic to this question.
`All material bodies are divisible into parts,`
Material bodies --> Divisible
`and everything divisible is ... -
PT2.S4.Q23 - an advertisement states:Im slightly confused by this question. It says that taking 'no headache pill stops pain more quickly' so why wouldn't the answer be B? Unless it is r…
Im slightly confused by this question. It says that taking 'no headache pill stops pain more quickly' so why wouldn't the answer be B? Unless it is referring to one person taking different types of pills and comparing its effect, Danaxil would most quickly ... -
PT2.S2.Q23 only question stem shownOnly question stem and all answer choices are shown. No stimulus.
Only question stem and all answer choices are shown. No stimulus. -
PT24.S3.Q11 - Special kinds of cotton that grow fibershttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-3-question-11/ When I was timing myself, this question took me almost 2 minutes because I coul…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-3-question-11/
When I was timing myself, this question took me almost 2 minutes because I couldn't choose the right answer choice. I think I was not understanding the first sentence ... -
PT6.S3.Q24 - rumored declines in automobileI thought that this was an example of a part to whole fallacy. The author concludes that the decrease in revenue is exaggerated because part (parts a…
I thought that this was an example of a part to whole fallacy. The author concludes that the decrease in revenue is exaggerated because part (parts and service companies) of the industry have succeeded even after admitting that manufacturers' share of the ... -
PT64.S3.Q09 - in some jurisdictions, lawmakersI chose D because all the other answers weren't strengthening the argument and the answer is A but the reason why I didn't pick it was because it say…
I chose D because all the other answers weren't strengthening the argument and the answer is A but the reason why I didn't pick it was because it says " that are proportional to the harm they BELIEVE to result from those crimes". We're not talking about ... -
PT28.S1.Q20 - Economy, Unemployment, InvestmentHi could someone help me out with the diagramming on this one? I found it absolutely confounding and I'm usually pretty decent at conditional phrasin…
Hi could someone help me out with the diagramming on this one? I found it absolutely confounding and I'm usually pretty decent at conditional phrasing.
So what I took away from this after looking at this thoroughly was that the original ... -
PT5.S3.Q12 - the number of north american childrenHi All, Any chance someone is willing to help me understand why the correct answer choice for this question is C? I cannot seem to figure out how…
Hi All,
Any chance someone is willing to help me understand why the correct answer choice for this question is C? I cannot seem to figure out how one gets to that answer. Thank you! -
PT2.S3.G2Hi can someone help me with this game i am missing some of the big inferences and i have watched the explanation 4 times . https://7sage.com/lsat_ex…
Hi can someone help me with this game i am missing some of the big inferences and i have watched the explanation 4 times .
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-2-section-3-game-2/ -
PT51.S3.Q19 - style manaul: archaic spellings and stylesHi I was just hoping someone could help me sort out the conditional logic in this stimulus. I feel like there's a gap in my understanding of the firs…
Hi I was just hoping someone could help me sort out the conditional logic in this stimulus. I feel like there's a gap in my understanding of the first sentence of the stimulus.
The first statement is about archaic spellings being preserved ... -
PT1.S3.Q25 - on the basis of their statements**Point at Issue Argument Summary:** S: An owner of a work of art have the ethical right to destroy that artwork if (1) they find it morally/v…
**Point at Issue
Argument Summary:**
S: An owner of a work of art have the ethical right to destroy that artwork if (1) they find it morally/visually distasteful or (2) caring for it becomes inconvenient. This right to ... -
"Mathy" Questions drilling?Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... 2.
PT01.S3.Q11 - proportion
PT01.S3.Q21 - proportion
PT01.S3.Q12 - average
PT9.S2.Q23 - a poor farmer was fond ofThe negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class?
The negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class?PTA.S1.Q23I was thrown off by the question stem for A.1.23, in which it asks, "The Y's response would most seriously call into question which one of the follow…
I was thrown off by the question stem for A.1.23, in which it asks, "The Y's response would most seriously call into question which one of the following conclusions, if that conclusion were drawn on the basis of the evidence given by X?" Does this question ...PT55.S2.P2(Q09) & PT55.S2.P4(Q23)Hi all, Having trouble with 2 questions in pretest 55, and I'd love to get some further explanation if anyone would be so kind! In the second p…
Hi all,
Having trouble with 2 questions in pretest 55, and I'd love to get some further explanation if anyone would be so kind!
In the second passage(s) in RC, for question #9, I chose C. Is this wrong because of the "most"; I ...PT60.S3.Q10 - A ring of gas emitting X-rays flickeringhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-10/ I got this one right almost instinctively (I didn't map this out), but I have a…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-10/
I got this one right almost instinctively (I didn't map this out), but I have a question about the phrase "**_can best be explained if_**" in the second sentence of the ...
